scholarly journals Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Philip Gabel ◽  
Markus Melloh ◽  
Michael Yelland ◽  
Brendan Burkett ◽  
Anne Roiko
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Working Population ◽  
Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Subacute Low Back Pain ◽  
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire

scholarly journals Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validation of the Arabic Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in Patients With Low Back Pain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Z. Alrwaily ◽  
Fahad Alanazi
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract BACKGROUND: The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ) assesses the psychosocial factors in people with complaints of musculoskeletal disorders and predict those likely to develop persistent symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To culturally-adapt and assess the validity of the ÖMPQ in an Arabic population with low back pain (LBP).METHODS: The ÖMPQ was translated into Arabic. Eighty-four patients completed the questionnaires at baseline, 2 days later, and 3 months follow-up. The test-retest reliability, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), specific agreement, predictive validity and content validity were assessed.RESULTS: For construct validity, the Arabic ÖMPQ (A-ÖMPQ) had a moderate (r ≥ 0.3, < 0.5) to high (r ≥ 0.5) correlation with pain, disability, fear-avoidance and catastrophizing questionnaires. The test-rest reliability showed was high ICC2,1=0.92 (95% CI: .83 - .96). The A-ÖMPQ score at baseline can significantly predict disability at 3 months F(1,82)=33.87, p<.01; R2=.29.CONCLUSIONS: The translation of the A-ÖMPQ into Arabic was successful. The A-ÖMPQ showed very good psychometric properties, and thus can be used to evaluate the psychosocial factors amongst patients with LBP.

Using the Dallas Pain Questionnaire to Classify Individuals With Low Back Pain in a Working Population

Spine ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (16) ◽  
pp. 1783-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ozguler ◽  
Alice Guéguen ◽  
Annette Leclerc ◽  
Marie-France Landre ◽  
Michèle Piciotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Working Population ◽  
Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Dallas Pain Questionnaire

Screening Tools to Predict the Development of Chronic Low Back Pain: An Integrative Review of the Literature

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1651-1677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jena Pauli ◽  
Angela Starkweather ◽  
Jo Lynne Robins
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Start Back Screening Tool ◽  
Subacute Low Back Pain ◽  
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Abstract Content

AbstractObjectiveTo identify and describe available instruments that can be used to screen patients with acute or subacute low back pain for a chronic low back pain trajectory.DesignIntegrative literature review.MethodsAn electronic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PsychINFO databases took place from May through July of 2014 using systematic search strategies to identify screening instruments developed to identify people at risk of chronic low back pain. After screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as quality indicators, the identified studies were categorized based on whether the instrument measured psychological, clinical, or functional measures to predict chronic low back pain.ResultsInitial searches identified 2,274 potential articles. After assessing for duplicates, title, and abstract content, there were 129 remaining articles. Articles were further excluded after analysis of the text, for a total of 42 studies reviewed. Most instruments reviewed were unable to provide evidence of predictive power for developing chronic low back pain.ConclusionsThis review identified numerous instruments developed to assess the likelihood of chronic low back pain in acute and subacute low back pain populations. Of the instruments reviewed, the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire demonstrated superior predictive power compared with other instruments. Both screening tools offer evidence of validation, translation into different languages and international application, and usage in various health care settings and provide data on predictive power.

Shared and Independent Associations of Psychosocial Factors on Work Status Among Men With Subacute Low Back Pain

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Shaw ◽  
Adrienne Means-Christensen ◽  
Mark A. Slater ◽  
Thomas L. Patterson ◽  
John S. Webster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Work Status ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Subacute Low Back Pain

A systematic review of the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain, back and low back pain in people with spinal cord injury

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 705-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Michailidou ◽  
Louise Marston ◽  
Lorraine H. De Souza ◽  
Ian Sutherland
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cord Injury

scholarly journals Effect of Physiotherapy Treatment in the Autonomic Activation and Pain Perception in Male Patients with Non-Specific Subacute Low Back Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1793
Author(s):  
Vanesa Abuín-Porras ◽  
Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez ◽  
Gonzalo Jaén-Crespo ◽  
Emmanuel Navarro-Flores ◽  
Helios Pareja-Galeano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Physiotherapy Treatment ◽  
Subacute Low Back Pain ◽  
Subjective Pain ◽  
System Activation

Introduction: Physiotherapy treatment is a common intervention for low back pain (LBP) patients. These interventions have been related to physiological effects in the central nervous system. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the effect of physiotherapy treatment in patients with LBP in the autonomic nervous system activation and subjective pain perception of patients. Methods: A total of 30 male subjects diagnosed with non-specific subacute LBP received a 50 min session consisting of (a) a manual therapy based on joint mobilization and soft tissues techniques in the lumbo-pelvic area, (b) a stretching program, and (c) motor control exercises of the core muscles. The autonomic modification of participants was assessed prior to and after the physiotherapy treatment. Results: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis reported a significant increase in average RR (p = 0.001), RMSSD (p = 0.008), LRMSSD (p = 0.001), SDNN (p = 0.005), and PNN50 (p = 0.024) after the session. Frequency-domain measures showed a significant increase in LF (p = 0.030) and HF (p = 0.014), and a decrease in LF/HF ratio (p = 0.046). A significant decrease was found in minimum HR values (p = 0.001) and average HR (p = 0.001). Moreover, maximal HR decreased its value from 116.7 ± 26.1 to 113.7 ± 40.8 after intervention. In addition, subjective pain perception (VAS scores) was significantly lower (p = 0.001) in the post-session assessment. Conclusions: Physiotherapy treatment produced an increase in parasympathetic nervous system activation and a decrease in subjective pain perception in non-specific subacute LBP patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document