Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1117-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Hodel ◽  
Frank J. P. Beeres ◽  
Reto Babst ◽  
Björn-Christian Link
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Compression Plating

scholarly journals Mortality and morbidity of proximal femur fractures in elderly population – A three year follow-up study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Sandeep Krishna Avulapati ◽  
◽  
Avinash Bajjuri ◽  
Sunil Boddu ◽  
Anudeep Peddineni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Femur Fractures

scholarly journals TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF KICK STAND SCREW IN FIXATION OF SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES USING CONTRALATERAL REVERSED DISTAL FEMORAL LOCKING PLATEPROSPECTIVE SINGLE CENTRIC STUDY

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Prashant Pandey ◽  
K K Pandey ◽  
Ajay Dhanopeeya ◽  
Surya Prakash Garg
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Plate Bending ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Subtrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Shaft Angle

PURPOSE- All type of plates when used for proximal femur fractures always has chances of mechanical failure due to lack of strength of the construct, but addition of ‘kick stand screw’ has some effects on stability of the construct. Aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of kick stand screw in fixation of subtrochanteric fractures using contralateral reversed distal femoral locking plate. METHOD- 30 patients of subtrochanteric fractures fixed using contralateral reversed distal femoral locking plate. N(1st)=15 fixed without kick stand screw and other N(2nd)=15 fixed using kick stand screw. Calcar screw( Kick Stand Screw) is placed to support calcar region (inferior to the center in AP view and central in Lateral view). In other group screws are placed as oriented in screw holes. Outcome was assessed using Harris Hip Score and VAS score and change in the neck shaft angle is also followed. RESULT- Union rate was 80% in 1st group as compare to 94% in second group. Mean Harris hip score at the one year follow up was 71.2 in 1st group as compare to 89.2 in 2nd group. Mean Visual analogue scale was 3.2 in first group as compare to 1.6 in second group at final follow up. Mean neck shaft angle at final follow-up was 120 degree in first group as compared to135 degree in second group. Complication- 1st Group of patients had three failures 2 in the form of screw break down and one in the form of plate bending, all three lend up in to varus deformity but the 2nd group had only one failure in the form of plate bending. CONCLUSION-In our study cases in which kick stand screw was used they showed better mechanical strength and gave better clinical results. So in proximal femur fractures including subtrochanteric fracture fixation ‘kick stand screw’ must be used.

scholarly journals Surgical management of pertrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking compression plate

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Biju R. ◽  
Kumar Babu B.L.S. ◽  
Sarat Chandra M.
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Locking Compression Plate ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Compression Plate ◽  
Type 3

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Pertrochanteric femoral fractures are of intense interest globally. Pertrochanteric fracture is a one of the most serious cause of mortality and morbidity in elderly people. The number of such admissions is on a raise because of increasing life span, sedentary habits and increased road traffic accidents. Pertrochanteric region is a high stress area. Hence delayed union, implant failures, varus collapse and non-union are common complications. Choice of implant was also a tough decision for surgeons in this area. Hence this study was intended to evaluate the functional outcome of proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femur locking compression plate (PFLCP) in terms of union of fracture, patient compliance and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> This prospective study was conducted at the department of orthopaedics, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore from December 2014 to June 2016. The complete data was collected from all the patients by taking history of illness and by doing detailed clinical examination and relevant investigations. Finally after the diagnosis, the patients were selected for the study depending on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Postoperatively all the cases were followed for the minimum period of 6 months to maximum period of 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 22 patients were involved. There were 14 males and 8 females, with a mean age of 46 years. 19 cases were admitted due to slip and fall and with slight predominance of right side. Mean duration of hospital stay was 20 days and mean time of full weight bearing is 10 weeks. Out of 22 cases 2 cases lost follow up before first follow up time of 6 weeks. Out of 20, remaining cases 8 were type 3 and 12 were type 4. Functional results were graded by Harris hip scoring system. Good to excellent results were seen in 87% cases of type 3 fractures and 83% cases in type 4 fractures.</p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with a PFLCP can provide good-to-excellent healing for proximal femur fractures, with a limited occurrence of complications especially for severe comminuted fracture and osteoporosis.

scholarly journals The PFNA® Augmented in Revision Surgery of Proximal Femur Fractures

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 232-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Scola ◽  
Florian Gebhard ◽  
Christoph Dehner ◽  
Götz Röderer
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Proximal Femur Fracture ◽  
Bone Stock ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures

Objectives: Modern implants for proximal femur fracture treatment have clearly improved clinical results. However, complications, including cut-out and loss of reduction, requiring revision surgery still occur. A major challenge in these cases is a loss of bone stock due to the existing implant, which is usually exacerbated by osteoporosis. A potential solution is the augmentation of implants, for example, of the femoral neck blade using bone cement. Materials and Methods: Ten patients (five loosening of femoral neck implant, two pseudarthrosis, two implant failures and one acute fracture) were included. The initial hardware was removed and a PFNA augmented was implanted. The perforated femoral neck blade was augmented using polymethyl methacrylate cement. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at a mean of 5.4 months (SD ±4.34). The main outcome parameters were fracture healing and implant-related complications. Results: Technical handling was uneventful in all cases. No cement leakage into the joint occurred in any of the cases. The mean amount of cement injected was 5.3 ml. The fracture healed during follow-up in all cases except two patients who died from causes unrelated to the procedure and prior to complete consolidation. Problem-free elective hardware removal of the PFNA augmented was performed in two cases. Discussion: The PFNA augmented is a potential implant for joint-preserving revision surgery in proximal femur fractures. The augmentation improves implant anchorage in the impaired bone stock. In this preliminary series, no negative biological side effects of the cement (i.e. osteonecrosis) were observed.

scholarly journals Geriatric Proximal Femur Fractures During the Covid-19 Pandemic - Fewer Cases, But More Comorbidities

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932110096
Author(s):  
Christina Polan ◽  
Heinz-Lothar Meyer ◽  
Manuel Burggraf ◽  
Monika Herten ◽  
Paula Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Minor Trauma ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging healthcare systems worldwide. This study examines geriatric patients with proximal femur fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic, shifts in secondary disease profile, the impact of the pandemic on hospitalization and further treatment. Methods: In a retrospective monocentric study, geriatric proximal femur fractures treated in the first six months of 2020 were analyzed and compared with the same period of 2019. Pre-traumatic status (living in a care home, under supervision of a legal guardian), type of trauma, accident mechanism, geriatric risk factors, associated comorbidities, time between hospitalization and surgery, inpatient time and post-operative further treatment of 2 groups of patients, aged 65-80 years (Group 1) and 80+ years (Group 2) were investigated. Results: The total number of patients decreased (70 in 2019 vs. 58 in 2020), mostly in Group 1 (25 vs. 16) while the numbers in Group 2 remained almost constant (45 vs. 42). The percentage of patients with pre-existing neurological conditions rose in 2020. This corresponded to an increase in patients under legal supervision (29.3%) and receiving pre-traumatic care in a nursing home (14.7%). Fractures were mostly caused by minor trauma in a home environment. In 2020, total number of inpatient days for Group 2 was lower compared to Group 1 (p = 0.008). Further care differed between the years: fewer Group 1 patients were discharged to geriatric therapy (69.6% vs. 25.0%), whereas in Group 2 the number of patients discharged to a nursing home increased. Conclusions: Falling by elderly patients is correlated to geriatric comorbidities, consequently there was no change in the case numbers in this age group. Strategic measures to avoid COVID-19 infection in hospital setting could include reducing the length of hospital stays by transferring elderly patients to a nursing home as soon as possible and discharging independent, mobile patients to return home.

Durability of Hemiarthroplasty for Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 3607-3610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Houdek ◽  
Cody C. Wyles ◽  
Joshua R. Labott ◽  
Peter S. Rose ◽  
Michael J. Taunton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures

scholarly journals Treatment of Proximal Femur Fractures on the Background of Osteoporosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
A F Lazarev ◽  
E I Solod ◽  
A O Ragozin ◽  
M G Kakabadze ◽  
A F Lazarev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Stable Fixation ◽  
Fracture Characteristics ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Choice Of Treatment ◽  
Density Evaluation

Analysis of treatment of 526 patients with proximal femur fractures (362 patients with femoral neck fractures and 164 patients with trochanteric zone fractures) was performed. Patients' age ranged from 34 to 92 (mean 67). Algorithm of differentiated choice of operative tactics depending on fracture characteristics and injury term was presented. Low invasive osteosynthesis of femoral neck with bundle of stressed V-shaped pins was suggested. Theoretical and practical ground of that technique was given. Stress within fixative-bone system created after osteosynthesis by V-shaped pins, provided stable fixation even in marked osteoporosis. The importance of bone mineral density evaluation for the choice of treatment tactics as well as the necessity of medicamental correction of the disturbed bone remodeling after surgical treatment was noted.

scholarly journals Role of cephalomedullary nail in proximal femur fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 929
Author(s):  
Nishant Kumar ◽  
Dhruv Sharma ◽  
Kuljit Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Cephalomedullary Nail ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Bending Loads ◽  
Cephalomedullary Nails

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Hip fractures are recognized to be a major public health problem. Key determinants of hip fractures include age, osteoporosis, and falls. In these determinants socioeconomic status, have not been well explored. Under eccentric loading, high bending loads occur, leading to failure of the osteosynthetis anchorage at the center of the femoral head.The introduction of the reconstruction nail has broadened the indications for the intramedullary fixation of difficult femoral fractures. The operative technique is however complicated. Some technical difficulties encountered during its use are presented together with guidance to allow these problems to be avoided.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This Study had included 47 cases which were operated by single surgeon and use of different implant (cephalomedullary nail) was randomized irrespective of fracture types and pattern. This study was done over a period of 12 months (October 2013 to October 2014) with 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months follow up. At every visit patient were assessed as per Oxford hip score. Type of implant used was<strong> </strong>PFNA<strong>,</strong> Intertan<strong>, </strong>Sirus Nail</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The mean age of the patients was 65.68 (±13.55) years. Severe pain was observed among majority of the patients at one month (70.2%) which became mild (40.4%) and moderate (34%) at 3 months. Very mild pain was found in 36.2% patients at 6 months and in 61.7% at 12 months. The limping was all the time among all the patients at one month. However, the limping was found often in 46.8% at 3 months and sometimes in 57.4% at 6 months and 53.2% at 12 months. The hip score was found to be severe among all the patients at one month. However, moderate to severe hip was in 46.8% patients at 3 months, mild to moderate was in 57.4% at 6 months and satisfactory joint function was in 68.1% at 12 months. The comparison of Hip score according to long or short nail at one 3, 6 and 12 months showed no difference. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Cephalomedullary nails with adequate technique so that the lag screws by purchase in the centre-centre or posterior-inferior quadrant combines the benefit of sliding hip screw as well as intramedullary implants. So we recommend the use of cephalomedullary nails in proximal femur fractures especially the unstable fractures.</span></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document