scholarly journals Recommendations on postoperative strain and physical labor after abdominal and hernia surgery: an expert survey of attendants of the 41st EHS Annual International Congress of the European Hernia Society

Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Schaaf ◽  
A. Willms ◽  
R. Schwab ◽  
C. Güsgen

Abstract Background There are no valid recommendations or reliable guidelines available to guide patients how long they should refrain from lifting weights or returning to heavy physical labor after abdominal or hernia surgery. Recent studies found that surgeons’ recommendations not to be evidence-based and might be too restrictive considering data on fascial healing and incisional hernia development. It is likely that this impairs the patient’s quality of life and leads to remarkable socio-economic costs. Hence, we conducted this survey to gather international expert’s opinions on this topic. Materials and methods At the 41st Annual International Congress of the EHS, attending international experts were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning recommendations on given proposals for postoperative refrain from heavy work or lifting after abdominal surgery and also after hernia repairs. Results In total, 127 experts took part in the survey. 83.9% were consultants with a mean experience since specialization of more than 11 years. Two weeks of no heavy physical strain after laparoscopic surgery were considered sufficient by more than 50% of the participants. For laparotomy, more than 50% rated 4 weeks appropriate. For mesh-augmented sublay and IPOM repair of ventral or incisional hernias, more than 50% rated 4 weeks of rest appropriate. For complex hernia repair, 37% rated 4 weeks reasonable. Two weeks after, groin hernia surgery was considered sufficient by more than 50% of the participants. Conclusion Following groin hernia repair (Lichtenstein/endoscopic technique) and laparoscopic operation, the majority agreed on the proposal of 2 weeks refraining from physical strain. Four weeks of no physical strain were considered appropriate by a majority after laparotomy and open incisional hernia repair. However, the results showed substantial variation in the ratings, which indicates uncertainty even in this selected cohort of hernia surgery experts and emphasizes the need for further scientific evaluation. This is particularly remarkable, because a lack of evidence that early postoperative strain leads to higher incisional hernia rates. Trial registration Number DRKS00023887.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mário Rui Gonçalves ◽  
Conceição Antunes ◽  
Mariana Capinha ◽  
Ana Rita Arantes ◽  
Paulo Almeida ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim “COVID has been a great challenge for Hospitals around the world. At our surgical department a new protocol of TAP block was designed and implemented in our laparoscopic incisional ventral hernia repairs, to allow these patients to be operated in ambulatory regime, without compromising pain control and the outcomes. In this video we aim to present the technique for the Laparoscopic-guided TAP Block during a Laparoscopic IPOM Plus ventral hernia repair.” Material and Methods “We implemented this protocol in July 2020 and since then, we performed 18 TAP block in laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs, laparoscopic guided by the Surgeon or ultrasound-guided by the Anesthesiologist. In this case, the video reports to a Laparoscopic IPOM Plus incisional hernia repair performed on a 54-year-old patient, male, with obesity, arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia. He had a 6 centimeter incisional hernia post-colorectal surgery in 2013.” Results “As detailed in the video, we show all the steps to perform a TAP block under laparoscopic direct visualization” Conclusions “TAP block can be performed by the Surgeon, with direct visualization at the beginning of the laparoscopic procedure.”


Hernia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. van Veenendaal ◽  
M. M. Poelman ◽  
B. van den Heuvel ◽  
B. J. Dwars ◽  
W. H. Schreurs ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are pivotal to evaluate the efficacy of surgical management. Debate persists on the optimal surgical technique to repair incisional hernias. Assessment of PROs can guide the selection of the best management of patients with incisional hernias. The objective of this cohort study was to present the PROs after incisional hernia repair at long term follow-up. Methods Patients with a history of incisional hernia repair were seen at the out-patient clinic to collect PROs. Patients were asked about the preoperative indication for repair and postoperative symptoms, such as pain, feelings of discomfort, and bulging of the abdominal wall. Additionally, degree of satisfaction was asked and Carolina Comfort Scales were completed. Results Two hundred and ten patients after incisional hernia repair were included with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. The main indication for incisional hernia repair was the presence of a bulge (60%). Other main reasons for repair were pain (19%) or discomfort (5%). One hundred and thirty-two patients (63%) reported that the overall status of their abdominal wall had improved after the operation. Postoperative symptoms were reported by 133 patients (63%), such as feelings of discomfort, pain and bulging. Twenty percent of patients reported that the overall status of their abdominal wall was the same, and 17% reported a worse status, compared to before the operation. Ten percent of the patients would not opt for operation in hindsight. Conclusion This study showed that a majority of the patients after incisional hernia repair still report pain or symptoms such as feelings of discomfort, pain, and bulging of the abdominal wall 3 years after surgery. Embedding patients’ expectations and PROs in the preoperative counseling discussion is needed to improve decision-making in incisional hernia surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fotis Archontovasilis ◽  
Ioannis Tselios

Abstract Aim The aim of this study is to present a single centre’s experience in Robotic and Laparoscopic eTEP TAR technique in ventral and incisional hernia repair. Additionally, the purpose of this study is to compare these Robotic and Laparoscopic techniques in terms of feasibility, efficacy, safety, advantages and disadvantages. Material and Methods This is a case-series comparative study of patients with M1-M5 / W3 ventral and incisional hernia that underwent Robotic or Laparoscopic eTEP-TAR repair in a single institution. Patients’ characteristics were reviewed and perioperative outcomes were extracted. All patients were followed-up at the outpatient surgical unit. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were analyzed. Results 35 patients (19 males) with a mean age of 57 years underwent Robotic eTEP-TAR (21 patients) and Laparoscopic eTEP-TAR (14 patients) repair of M1-M3/W3 ventral (12 patients) and M2-M5/W3 incisional hernia. There were 3 conversions to open repair in the Robotic group (Rg) and 1 for the Laparoscopic group (Lg). The mean operative time in Rg was 345 minutes, while in Lg was 320 min. All patients were discharged between the first and fifth postoperative day. No major complications or recurrences were revealed during a mean postoperative follow-up time of 26 months. Conclusions Both techniques are feasible, reproducible, and safe, with no major differences in operative time, recurrence and complications rate. Nevertheless, these techniques are highly demanding procedures that should be performed by experienced hernia surgeons, in well-organized centers of excellence in hernia surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Woleský ◽  
Barbora Jíšová ◽  
Barbora East

Abstract Aim Our aim was to analyze patient’s reported EuraHS QoL (quality of life) scores before and after hernia surgery. And find whether the result is surgeon dependent or not, because hernia repair often serves as a training surgery for young surgeons or is performed by surgeons with no hernia interest. However, even a simple groin hernia repair can lead to life-long pain or reduced QoL and the risk of complications following incisional hernia repair is much higher. Material and Methods We have utilized the EuraHS database and its QoL questionnaire and prospectively entered all patients undergoing any hernia repair at our department since Jan. 2019. Results 519 patients have been included. Many patients in the incisional hernia cohort have reported no or very little symptoms before the operation. Only 251 have completed their 1 month follow-up with the QoL questionnaire. 63 patients have been contacted and questioned 1 year post-surgery to this date. In 6 cases the QoL scores are lower than pre-repair. 45 patients had a record of major complication or reoccurrence requiring surgery so far. Unfortunately 31 of those did not fill up the QoL questionnaire. 37 were operated on by resident with a supervision of a surgeon without a hernia interest. Conclusions Results of hernia repair are surgeon dependent and an internal audit of current practices is needed at many general surgery departments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ewing ◽  
K Hodge ◽  
R McFadyen ◽  
C Grossart ◽  
B East ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a lockdown in South East Scotland on the 23 March 2020. This had an impact on the volume of benign elective surgery able to be undertaken. The degree to which this reduced hernia surgery was unknown. The aim of this study was to review the hernia surgery workload in the Lothian region of Scotland and assess the impact of COVID-19 on hernia surgery. Method The Lothian Surgical Audit database was used to identify all elective and emergency hernia operations over a six-month period from 23 March 2020, and for the same time period in 2019. Data was collected on age, gender, location of the hernia, type of hernia repair and whether elective or emergency operation. Results The number of hernia repairs reduced dramatically between 2019 and 2020 (570 versus 149). The majority of this can be explained by a reduction in elective operating (488 versus 87). There was, however, also a reduction in the numbers of hernias repaired as an emergency over the same study periods (82 to 62). Lockdown in 2020 had the biggest effect on elective incisional hernia repair (74 versus 2). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced both the number of elective and emergency hernia operations in 2020 compared to 2019. While the reduction in elective surgery has not resulted in an associated increase in emergency surgery over the study period, it is possible that if continuing reduced availability to elective hernia surgery continues in Lothian, the emergency hernia workload may increase.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Janet ◽  
Sophiane Derbal ◽  
Sylvaine Durand Fontanier ◽  
Stephane Bouvier ◽  
Niki Christou ◽  
...  

AbstractThe introduction of biological or absorbable synthetic meshes has provided an alternative to conventional repair for incisional hernia. The ability to predict the development of complications after hernia surgery is important, as it guides surgical planning and patient management. This retrospective study assessed whether the postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level can predict complications after incisional hernia repair using biological mesh reinforcement. Patients who underwent incisional hernia repair surgery using biological meshes between February 2009 and February 2015 were screened for study inclusion. Patients included in the study were divided into two groups: those with and without postoperative complications. The two groups were analysed based on sex, surgical operation, length of intensive care unit stay (ICU), complications and mortality. Laboratory values, including white blood cell (WBC) count and CRP levels, were determined preoperatively and up to postoperative day (POD) 10. Postoperative complications requiring further management occurred in 32 of the 60 patients (53.3%). Among 47 patients, the mean CRP and WBC levels were 6.6 mg/L and 9.073 G/L in the group without complications vs. 141.0 mg/L, 16.704 G/L in the group with complications (p < 0.001). Patients with complications also had a longer ICU stay (10.1 vs. 0.6 days, p < 0.0001). A cut-off was 101 mg/L and offered 80.00% sensitivity (IC 61.43% to 92.29) and 95.24% specificity (76.18% to 99.88%) for postoperative complication. The rate of postoperative complications before POD10 was 95% in the group with CRP > 100 mg/L vs. 46% in the group with CRP < 100 mg/L (p = 0.000372). A high postoperative CRP level (> 100 mg/L) up to POD10 may serve as a predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing incisional hernia using biological meshes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 762-767
Author(s):  
Fareed Cheema ◽  
Oya Andacoglu ◽  
Li-Ching Huang ◽  
Sharon E. Phillips ◽  
Flavio Malcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document