Analysis of Factors Affecting the Length of Stay in the Emergency Department for Critically Ill Patients Transferred to Regional Emergency Medical Centers

BackgroundTransferring an emergency patient to another emergency department (ED) is necessary when she/he is unable to receive necessary treatment from the first visited ED, although the transfer poses potential risks for adverse clinical outcomes and lowering the quality of emergency medical services by overcrowding the transferred ED. This study aimed to understand the factors affecting the ED length of stay (LOS) of critically ill patients and to investigate whether they are receiving prompt treatment through Interhospital Transfer (IHT).MethodsThis study analyzed 968 critically ill patients transferred to the ED of the study site in 2019. Machine learning based prediction models were built to predict the ED LOS dichotomized as greater than 6 hours or less. Explanatory variables in patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, transfer-related characteristics, and ED characteristics were selected through univariate analyses.ResultsAmong the prediction models, the Logistic Regression (AUC 0.85) model showed the highest prediction performance, followed by Random Forest (AUC 0.83) and Naïve Bayes (AUC 0.83). The Logistic Regression model suggested that the need for emergency operation or angiography (OR 3.91, 95% CI=1.65–9.21), the need for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (OR 3.84, 95% CI=2.53–5.83), fewer consultations (OR 3.57, 95% CI=2.84–4.49), a high triage level (OR 2.27, 95% CI=1.43–3.59), and fewer diagnoses (OR 1.32, 95% CI=1.09–1.61) coincided with a higher likelihood of 6-hour-or-less stays in the ED. Furthermore, an interhospital transfer handoff led to significantly shorter ED LOS among the patients who needed emergency operation or angiography, or ICU admission, or had a high triage level.ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that patients prioritized in emergency treatment receive prompt intervention and leave the ED in time. Also, having a proper interhospital transfer handoff before IHT is crucial to provide efficient care and avoid unnecessarily longer stay in ED.

Radiation-free Insertion of Interlocked Intramedullary Tibial Nail in Closed Extra-articular Displaced Tibial Shaft Fractures in an Emergency Setup

Background. Interlocking nailing is considered a gold standard surgical treatment of mid-shaft closed diaphyseal tibial fractures. With increasing exposure of orthopaedic surgeons to radiation, we propose a solution to this health hazard through a study wherein we perform the surgery without any radiation or C-arm exposure. Material and methods. This prospective study was done at GMC Jammu from January 2017 to February 2020 and included 218 patients, with 18 patients having bilateral tibia fractures in the age group 15 to 58 years (mean of 37.6 years), including 63.7% males (n=139) and 36.3% females (n=79). The 236 extra-articular closed tibial mid-diaphyseal fractures were operated on and intramedullary tibial nailing was performed without a single C-arm exposure. Postoperative x-rays were done and reduction assessed by standard acceptable criteria. Results. Among 236 cases in which nailing was done, 227 (96%) patients were successfully distally locked, including 128 (56.3%) locked through the jig and 99 (43.6%) by “hit and trial method.” All cases met acceptability criteria set for management of tibia by nailing. Conclusions. 1.This study strengthens the proof that closed extra-articular diaphyseal fractures of the tibia can be managed by nailing without using the C-arm with excellent results. 2.The C-arm is always available for cases where distal locking could not be achieved. 3. The technique has a great role in centres with limited facilities of intra-operative radiography in emergency operation theatres.

Sudden bilateral foot drop due to dorsally unilateral migration of the herniated lumbar disc: A case report

BACKGROUND: Due to the anatomical characteristics of the anterior epidural space, dorsal migration of material from herniated lumbar disc is quite rare. Also, bilateral foot drop due to unilateral dorsal migration of disc herniation is extremely rare. This report presents a case of sudden bilateral foot drop caused by the unilateral dorsal migration of material from a herniated lumbar disc. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 51-year-old male presented with sudden onset severe leg pain with bilateral foot drop. The patient was referred to our emergency department by a local clinic. Neurological examination showed bilateral ankle and big toe dorsiflexion weakness grade 1. There was no perianal anesthesia, anal sphincter weaknesses, or voiding difficulty. Apart from essential hypertension, this patient’s medical history was unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that intervertebral disc material in the dorsal extradural space at the L3-4 level had compressed the dural sac from the left side to the center. We performed an emergency operation. The pathologic result revealed fibrous cartilaginous materials. After the operation, the leg pain was markedly resolved. At postoperative three months, the patient showed improvement of foot drop. CONCLUSION: We recommended emergent mass removal, which produced a favorable outcome.

Learning From Each Other in the Management of Natural Disaster and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study in Taiwan

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan has been one of the best performers in the world with extremely low infections and deaths. This success can be attributed to the long experiences dealing with natural disasters and communicable diseases. However, with different disastrous characteristics, the disaster management systems for communicable diseases and natural disasters are very different in terms of laws, plans, frameworks, and emergency operations. Taking the response to COVID-19 pandemic as a study subject, we found that disaster management for communicable diseases can be improved through a comparison with natural disasters, and vice versa. First, having wider and longer impacts than natural disasters, the plans and framework for communicable diseases in Taiwan focus more on national and regional scales. Local governments would need more capacity support including budgets and training to conduct investigations and quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, for quick response, the emergency operation for communicable diseases was designed to be more flexible than that for natural disasters by giving the commander more authority to adjust to the circumstances. The commanding system requires a more objective consultation group to prevent arbitrary decisions against the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, risk governance is important for communicable diseases as well as for natural disasters. Additional efforts should be made to enhance vulnerability assessment, disaster reduction, and risk communication for shaping responses and policies in an efficient and coordinating way.

P-EGS14 From Gallstone Disease to Cholecystectomy: An audit looking at the waiting times for cholecystectomy in a small District General Hospital

Background Gallstone-related disease accounts for a third of emergency general surgery admissions and referrals. The average waiting time for acute gallstone presentations to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is about 7 days in England. This audit aims to identify emergency admissions and compare local management to the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) guidelines standards with a focus on waiting times for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Where AUGIS standards were not met, number of re-admissions and complications were identified. A cost analysis was also completed looking at the overall costs of delayed treatment. Methods We identified all patients admitted as an emergency between September 2019 and September 2020 with gallstone-related pathology. Patients not referred to the surgical team, with negative Ultrasound Scans (USS) or known HPB malignancy were excluded. The patients were divided into a pre- COVID -19 and during COVID-19 category (respectively before and after March 2020), to identify whether the cancellation to non- urgent elective surgery (due to COVID-19) had caused further delays or complications. Each patient’s management was compared to AUGIS guidelines depending on their diagnosis at presentation (biliary colic, cholecystitis, cholangitis, gallstone-related pancreatitis), focusing on the timing between presentation and LC. Results A total of 99 patients were identified. Of the patients presenting with biliary colic (n = 9 pre-COVID, n = 5 during COVID), none underwent LC within 72 hours from presentation as recommended by AUGIS. Of the patients presenting with cholecystitis (n = 20 pre-COVID and n = 16 during COVID), none had LC within the recommended 72 hours. 5 patients in each COVID group had LC, with a significantly longer waiting time compared to the pre-COVID group. Re-admissions and complications were similar for the cholecystitis patients in both COVID groups. In the gallstone-related pancreatitis group, only 1 patient underwent LC within the recommended 2 weeks. Conclusions This audit showed that locally we are failing to meet AUGIS guidelines for LC within 72 hrs, 2 weeks or 6 weeks both pre and during COVID. This has caused re-admissions of patients with cholecystitis, pancreatitis and perforated gallbladders. Factors that cause delay are limited access to USS, limited staff and theatre availability. To improve outcomes, it is necessary to implement a hot gallbladder service with dedicated theatre slots. A change in the overall perception of LC is also needed: this is should be considered an emergency operation as its delay has a significant negative impact on patients’ outcomes.

P-BN44 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on waiting lists for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its effect on patient care and outcomes

Background It has been widely reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a detrimental impact on waiting lists for elective surgery in the NHS. Delays in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are likely to prolong suffering for symptomatic patients and risk increasing complications for patients which may then require emergency care and intervention. In this study we aim to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective waiting lists and to assess what implications this might have on patient care and outcomes. Methods Electronic health records were retrospectively interrogated for patients undergoing LC in both March 2019 (prior to the COVID-19 pandemic) and March 2021. The following data was captured: age, gender, elective vs emergency operation, laparoscopic vs open, total vs subtotal cholecystectomy, use of drains, length of stay/daycase rates, the number of emergency presentations prior to operation and the number of days between being listed for surgery and their operation. The results were analysed using SPSS Statistics (IBM, New York). Results 111 patients were included in the study (25 male and 86 female). Of these, 60 had their LC in 2019, and 51 in 2021. The age and gender distribution of the patients in both time periods were similar. The median number of days on the waiting list was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for patients in 2021 at 379.5 days, compared with 153 days in 2019. There was a significant increase in the number of emergency presentations prior to LC in 2021 (P = 0.025) with an average of 0.7 presentations per patient compared with 0.45 in 2019. Additionally, there was a significant increase in the number of emergency LC performed in 2021 (P = 0.002), with 15 performed compared with 4 in 2019, representing 29.4% and 6.7% of all LC respectively. There was no significant change in rates of conversion to open, drains or subtotal cholecystectomy. There was no significant difference in daycase rates for elective patients in either period (55% vs 58%). Conclusions Whilst there has been no change in the operative outcomes for patients undergoing LC, there has been a stark increase in the length of time patients are on a waiting list prior to undergoing elective LC. This has resulted in a significant increase in the number of emergency presentations and the number of emergency LC performed. This study demonstrates the wider impact of increasing waiting list times beyond the prolonged suffering of symptomatic patients. A significant reduction in waiting list times would be beneficial to both patients and healthcare providers, with the aim of reducing the number of emergency presentations. A reduction in these would have a positive impact on acute services and on the associated cost implications.

The Difference LTC Corporate Ownership Makes in Collaborations With Emergency Operation Centers During Disasters

Collaboration between nursing homes (NHs) and assisted living communities (ALCs) with state and local entities (e.g., emergency operation centers (EOCs)) is critical during a disaster. The corporate structure of NHs and ALCs can make a difference in their ability to collaborate with these entities during a disaster. This mixed-method study examines differences in satisfaction with collaboration with state and local entities during Hurricane Irma in Florida in 2017 between corporate-owned NHs (N=24), larger (25+ beds) ALCs (N=38) and smaller ALCs (N=30). We also explore collaboration in Florida NHs (N=35) and ALCs (N=123) specific to COVID19. Scaled 1-5 survey data results indicate that small ALCs are the least satisfied (M=2.90) with EOC collaboration, compared to NHs (M=3.04) and larger ALCs (M=3.33) during Irma. Smaller ALCs were more dissatisfied with COVID19 mandates compared to larger ALCs and NHs. Ways to improve collaboration during a disaster, especially for smaller ALCs, will be discussed.

A case of a different approach for difficult airway: transorbital endotracheal intubation

Background In patients who have undergone head and neck surgery and received radiotherapy, airway management presents serious difficulties for the anesthesiologist. Case presentation We report a case of a 23-year-old male patient undergoing an emergency operation due to a rhabdomyosarcoma pressed spinal cord that loss of muscle strength and loss of sensation developed below the level of thoracal 6–7 vertebrae. Because of the previous radiotherapy reducing the mouth opening (less than 1 cm), the patient was intubated by transorbital pathway without any difficulty. Conclusions Transorbital intubation seems to be a safe method and may be a good alternative to difficult airway in the patient undergoing orbital exenteration.