Numerical study of single helical piles and helical pile groups under compressive loading in cohesive and cohesionless soils

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 4001-4023
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Jahanshahi Nowkandeh ◽  
Askar Janalizadeh Choobbasti
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 800
Author(s):  
Miloš Marjanović ◽  
Mirjana Vukićević ◽  
Diethard König

Marine and harbor structures, wind turbines, bridges, offshore platforms, industrial chimneys, retaining structures etc. can be subjected to significant lateral loads from various sources. Appropriate assessment of the foundations capacity of these structures is thus necessary, especially when these structures are supported by pile groups. The pile group interaction effects under lateral loading have been investigated intensively in past decades, and the most of the conducted studies have considered lateral loading that acts along one of the two orthogonal directions, parallel to the edge of pile group. However, because of the stochastic nature of its source, the horizontal loading on the pile group may have arbitrary direction. The number of studies dealing with the pile groups under arbitrary loading is very limited. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of the arbitrary lateral loading on the pile group response, in order to improve (extend) the current design approach for laterally loaded pile groups. Free head, flexible bored piles in sand were analyzed through the extensive numerical study. The main hypothesis of the research is that some critical pile group configurations, loading directions, and soil conditions exist, which can lead to the unsafe structural design. Critical pile positions inside the commonly used pile group configurations are identified with respect to loading directions. The influence of different soil conditions was discussed.


Author(s):  
Michael C. McVay ◽  
Limin Zhang ◽  
Sangjoon Han ◽  
Peter Lai

A series of lateral load tests were performed on 3×3 and 4×4 pile groups in loose and medium-dense sands in the centrifuge with their caps located at variable heights to the ground surface. Four cases were considered: Case 1, pile caps located above the ground surface; Case 2, bottom of pile cap in contact with the ground surface; Case 3, top of pile cap at the ground surface elevation; and Case 4, top of pile cap buried one cap thickness below ground surface. All tests with the exception of Case 1 of the 4×4 group had their pile tips located at the same elevation. A special device, which was capable of both driving the piles and raining sand on the group in flight, had to be constructed to perform the tests without stopping the centrifuge (spinning at 45 g). The tests revealed that lowering the pile cap elevation increased the lateral resistance of the pile group anywhere from 50 to 250 percent. The experimental results were subsequently modeled with the bridge foundation-superstructure finite element program FLPIER, which did a good job of predicting all the cases for different load levels without the need for soil–pile cap interaction springs (i.e., p-y springs attached to the cap). The analyses suggest that the increase in lateral resistance with lower cap elevations may be due to the lower center of rotation of the pile group. However, it should be noted that this study was for pile caps embedded in loose sand and not dense sands or at significant depths. The experiments also revealed a slight effect for the case of the pile cap embedded in sand with a footprint wider than the pile row. In that case the size of the passive soil wedge in front of the pile group, and consequently the group’s lateral resistance, increased.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kachooee ◽  
Mohammad Ali Kafi ◽  
Mohsen Gerami

The concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are one of the most widely used lateral load-resisting systems. Seismic performance of these structures has a weakness that is due to the brace buckling at a lower loading than the ultimate compressive loading capacity. In this paper, attempt is made to enhance the seismic response of CBFs through utilizing a local fuse. For this purpose, first the formulation of fuse area and length are presented. Then based on this formulation, several numerical models have been built and analyzed to examine the effect of implementing this fuse on seismic response of CBFs. From the analyses results, it is found that if the reduced cross-section fuse (RCF) is properly designed and also the end of brace is fixed, the CBFs with equal energy dissipation capacity, that are equipped with this fuse exhibit a better ductility than the customary CBFs.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Plenyo Nahen Gonzaga Araújo ◽  
João Paulo da Silva Costa ◽  
Yuri Daniel Jatobá Costa

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1191-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeyad H. Elsherbiny ◽  
M. Hesham El Naggar

The compressive capacity of helical piles in sand and clay is investigated by means of field testing and numerical modeling. The numerical models are conducted using the computer program ABAQUS and are calibrated and verified using full-scale load testing data. The calibration was accomplished by using reasonable assumptions regarding soil–pile interaction and soil parameters reported from the literature. The model was verified by comparing its predictions with observed load–displacement curves obtained from full-scale pile load tests. The verified numerical model was used to perform a parametric study considering different pile configurations and soil parameters to evaluate the compressive capacity and load-transfer mechanism of helical piles. The compressive capacity obtained from the numerical models is compared with that obtained from existing theoretical methods for calculating the capacity. It is found that the predictions of theoretical equations for piles in cohesionless soil vary largely depending on the choice of bearing capacity factors and proper failure criteria. The interaction of closely spaced helices on the capacity of a helical pile is also evaluated. A bearing capacity reduction factor, R, and helix efficiency factor, EH, are proposed to evaluate the compressive capacity of helical piles in cohesionless soil considering an industry-acceptable ultimate load criterion corresponding to settlement equal to 5% of helix diameter, D.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document