Prominent persisting Eustachian valve initiates spontaneous right-to-left shunt and paradoxical embolism in a patient with patent foramen ovale

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 925-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Kato ◽  
Tomohisa Dembo ◽  
Hidetaka Takeda ◽  
Takuya Fukuoka ◽  
Norio Tanahashi
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Eustachian Valve

Patent Foramen Ovale, the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy Alone or Anticoagulant Therapy Alone Versus Device Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of the Literature and Current Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-150
Author(s):  
Harsha S. Nagarajarao ◽  
Chandra P. Ojha ◽  
Archana Kedar ◽  
Debabrata Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Narrow Channel ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Current Guidelines

: Cryptogenic stroke and its relation to the Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a long-debated topic. Recent clinical trials have unequivocally established the relationship between cryptogenic strokes and paradoxical embolism across the PFO. This slit-like communication exists in everyone before birth, but most often closes shortly after birth. PFO may persist as a narrow channel of communication between the right and left atria in approximately 25-27% of adults. : In this review, we examine the clinical relevance of the PFO with analysis of the latest trials evaluating catheter-based closure of PFO’s for cryptogenic stroke. We also review the current evidence examining the use of antiplatelet medications versus anticoagulants for stroke prevention in those patients with PFO who do not qualify for closure per current guidelines.

Paradoxical embolism through patent foramen ovale as a cause of myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naim Mridha ◽  
Eloise Ward ◽  
Samual Hayman ◽  
Arun Dahiya ◽  
Sandhir Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale

scholarly journals Contrast Echocardiography and Migraine in Divers with Patent Foramen Ovale

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 740-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Di Fabio ◽  
Elisabetta Giugni ◽  
Imerio Angeloni ◽  
Nicola Vanacore ◽  
Carlo Casali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Contrast Echocardiography ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Minimal Size ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Safe Method ◽  
Cerebral Embolization ◽  
Contrast Solution

Background:It has been proposed that the patent foramen ovale (PFO) may be associated with migraine, in particular migraine with aura. However, it is not clear whether paradoxical embolism triggers crises of headache. Cerebral embolization is provoked in subjects with PFO through contrast echocardiography, a safe method to diagnose the presence of foramen ovale pervium.Methods:Twenty-four men practicing diving, an activity characterized by increased prevalence of PFO and migraine, underwent trans-thoracic echocardiography with contrast solution, composed of saline and air mixture and checked for the occurrence of migraine in the following 24 hours.Results:A PFO (five of minimal size, i.e. visible only during Valsalva, one of small and two of medium size) was detected in 8/24 divers (33%). No one reported headache over the 24 hours after the procedure.Discussion:Our preliminary data suggest that cerebral micro-embolism, provoked by contrast echocardiography, does not systematically trigger migraine crises when a minimal-to-medium sized patent foramen ovale is present.

Patent Foramen Ovale Device Closure in a 27 Years Old Young Lady with Cryptogenic Ischaemic Stroke - First Case Report from Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-234
Author(s):  
AQM Reza ◽  
Aparajita Karim ◽  
Mahmood Hasan Khan ◽  
Kazi Atiqur Rahman ◽  
Md Aliuzzaman Joarder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Coagulation Therapy ◽  
First Case ◽  
Treatment Paradigm ◽  
Meta Analyses

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is highly prevalent in patients with strokes of unknown cause or cryptogenic strokes (CSs). It has been remained an unsolved question as to whether a PFO should be closed or not to prevent recurrent strokes in patients diagnosed with cryptogenic stroke (CS). A paradoxical embolism through a PFO is pointed as a leading cause of CS, especially in younger patients with low risk factors for stroke. It also remains an unsolved matter on type of anti-coagulation therapy, which would be better for patients with CS and a PFO. In addition, surgical and transcutaneous closure of a PFO has been proposed for the secondary prevention of stroke in patients with CS with PFO. Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted in recent years to test whether a PFO closure gives a significant benefit in the management of CS. Many investigators believed that a PFO was an incidental finding in patients with CS. However, meta-analyses and more recent specific trials have eliminated several confounding factors and possible biases and have also emphasized the use of a shunt closure over medical therapy in patients with CS. Therefore, these latest studies can possibly change the treatment paradigm in the near future. We are reporting a case of cryptogenic ischaemic stroke in middle cerebral artery territory due to paradoxical embolism through a PFO which was successfully closed with a device solely by a Bangladeshi Consultant & his team first time in Bangladesh. Cardiovasc. j. 2021; 13(2): 227-234

Abstract WP264: Frequency of Hypercoagulability in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Patent Foramen Ovale

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Liu ◽  
Srikant Rangaraju ◽  
Alexander Duncan ◽  
Samir Belagaje ◽  
Trina Belair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Paradoxical Embolism ◽  
Embolic Stroke ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Primary Mechanism ◽  
Detailed Evaluation ◽  
D Dimer

Introduction: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is more commonly found in patients with cryptogenic stroke and paradoxical embolism is commonly assumed to be the primary mechanism. Our objective was to determine the frequency of hypercoagulability in cryptogenic stroke patients and PFO. Methods: Consecutive patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) seen at the Emory Clinic from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019 who underwent echocardiogram with bubble study and markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA) testing (serum d-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, fibrin monomer) were included; abnormal MOCHA was defined as ≥ 2 elevated markers. Venous thromboembolism, malignancy, other defined hypercoagulable state, and the composite outcome were assessed at routine follow-up and compared across groups based on PFO status. Results: Of 172 patients (mean age 63 ± 16 years, 60% female), 40 (23%) had a PFO. Compared to the PFO- group, the PFO+ group was younger (p=<0.001), less likely to have hypertension (p<0.001) and diabetes (p=0.011), and had a higher ROPE score (p=0.007) (Table 1). There was no difference in the frequency of abnormal MOCHA between groups and the composite outcome was less frequent in PFO+ versus PFO- patients (p=0.017). In the subgroup of patients <60 years old, there was no difference in the frequency of abnormal MOCHA and the composite outcome. Conclusion: Hypercoagulability as measured by MOCHA was not associated with the presence of PFO in ESUS patients. Based on our results, ESUS patients should undergo a detailed evaluation for alternative causes of stroke other than paradoxical embolism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document