An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study

Odontology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizett Castellanos-Cosano ◽  
Alba Carrasco-García ◽  
José-Ramón Corcuera-Flores ◽  
Javier Silvestre-Rangil ◽  
Daniel Torres-Lagares ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Miika Hyvönen ◽  
Arttu Jaakkola ◽  
Tarja Tanner ◽  
Jari Päkkilä ◽  
Antti Kämppi ◽  
...  

Objectives. Bitewing radiographs are mainly used to confirm clinical findings in caries diagnostics. The objective here was to investigate the quality of bitewing radiographs after short brush-up training and additional findings besides caries in a low-caries population. Methods. The material of this cross-sectional study comprised 377 pairs of bitewing radiographs of 19- to 20-year-olds taken by dentists. Radiography was considered indicated if one dentinal caries lesion was present on clinical examination. A senior oral radiologist evaluated quality and diagnosed the findings afterwards unaware of clinical status. The association between variables was analysed using cross tabulation and chi-squared testing. Results. Almost half of the images were of compromised quality (44.1%). Dentinal caries lesions were detected in 82.3% and enamel lesions in 73.5% of the subjects. On average, the subjects had 1.7 (SD 0.52) dentinal lesions. Fillings were found in 81.8%, fractures/cracks in 11.7%, and attrition in 7.4% of the subjects. Signs of excessive bite force were recorded in 19.4%, whereas marginal bone loss was detected in 6.4%. No significant correlation was detected between fractures, attrition, and excessive bite forces. Conclusions. Effort must be taken to ensure high quality of bitewing radiographs. In addition to caries detection, bitewing radiographs offer additional value, such as detecting excessive bite forces, tooth wear, and marginal bone loss among young adults.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Galindo-Moreno ◽  
A. Fernández-Jiménez ◽  
G. Avila-Ortiz ◽  
F.J. Silvestre ◽  
P. Hernández-Cortés ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1165-1172
Author(s):  
Alba Sánchez-Torres ◽  
Iñaki Cercadillo-Ibarguren ◽  
Marta Moragón-Rodríguez ◽  
Rui Figueiredo ◽  
Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R Prithviraj ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Ninad Muley ◽  
Pushpinder Sandhu

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Massimo Amato ◽  
Vincenzo Bruno ◽  
Giuseppe Pantaleo ◽  
Antonio Cerutti ◽  
Gianrico Spagnuolo ◽  
...  

A case of implant-bone prosthetic rehabilitation, after the fracture of the maxillary central incisors, which had been treated with grafting of a bone substitute, is reported. This case was followed by the normal procedures of implantology within the traditional timeframe for bone regeneration. However, a barrier membrane was not used which shows that even along with the use of graft material a sufficient amount of bone could be achieved for a subsequent rehabilitation. Therefore, after a five-year follow-up period, osseointegration was maintained with no marginal bone loss.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-379
Author(s):  
Diederik Hentenaar ◽  
Yvonne De Waal ◽  
Arie Van Winkelhoff ◽  
Gerry Raghoebar ◽  
Henny Meijer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document