Public versus private status of records and archives: implications for access drawn from the archives of political representatives in the United States, France and Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikuláš Čtvrtník
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public Versus Private

scholarly journals Review of Regulatory Emphasis on Transportation Safety in the United States, 2002-2009: Public versus Private Modes

Risk Analysis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1085-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett C. Waycaster ◽  
Taiki Matsumura ◽  
Volodymyr Bilotkach ◽  
Raphael T. Haftka ◽  
Nam H. Kim
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Transportation Safety ◽  
Public Versus Private

Consummate to Reach Transaction Close

2020 ◽  
pp. 88-110
Author(s):  
Timothy Galpin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
European Union ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
National Security ◽  
The United States ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Public Versus Private ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Transaction Price

The period from signing a negotiated and agreed sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to actual deal close is full of hurdles, including satisfying regulatory requirements, gaining third-party approvals, and securing shareholder consent for the transaction. This chapter provides an overview of the key elements of consummating a transaction, from “signing to closing,” and covers the SPA; regulatory requirements and reviews in the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union; national security regulatory reviews; public versus private transactions; asset versus stock sales; closing and post-closing requirements; determining a final transaction price; methods of funding; break fees; earn-out provisions; and the impact of activist investors on M&A. The tools, templates, best practices, potential pitfalls, and a case example of how to move a deal from signing to closing are also addressed, along with the main participants, core activities, buyer’s and seller’s perspectives, and key cross-border considerations.

Private Prisons in a New Environment

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D. Camp
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
The United States ◽  
Private Prisons ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Current State ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prison Populations ◽  
Public Versus Private

This chapter focuses on the current state of practice, policy, and research related to privately operated prisons in the United States. I begin with a brief overview of the history of the rapid growth in the private sector in the United States, followed by a discussion of costs of public versus private prisons. While costs are easily quantified, assigning the proper costs to the public and private sectors has presented much controversy in previous studies. The issue of quality of correctional services provided by public versus private prisons is also reviewed, given that there is little agreement on the type of measures that allow for fair comparisons of public and private prisons. The chapter concludes with thoughts on issues facing public and private prisons in an era marked by stability or decline as opposed to rapid growth in prison populations.

A Budget Size in a Democracy: A Review of the Arguments

1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Amacher ◽  
Robert D. Tollison ◽  
Thomas D. Willett
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Public Spending ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bench Mark ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Spending ◽  
Systematic Biases ◽  
Public Versus Private ◽  
Public Private Mix ◽  
The U.S

There is no lack of opinion whether the public sector in the United States is too large or too small and there may even be a few who would argue that the present public-private mix is the correct one. While different individuals inevitably have different opinions given their underlying preferences and economic, political, and social positions, one can examine the systematic forces at work in the U.S. political and economic system to determine if they bias the mix of public versus private spending from what the average voter-consumer desires. Such examinations were pioneered by Pigou, Galbraith, Downs, Buchanan, and Tullock, among others. In this review their analyses are critically compared and extended especially with respect to what bench mark for “correct” budget size each author takes as relevant in his discussion. The question of possible systematic biases in the composition of public spending as well as in the public-private mix is addressed.

Correlative microscopy in distrubuted (client/server) computing environments: tools for catalyzing the rapid dissemination of information about the cell biology of the human prostate

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 682-683
Author(s):  
A. Hakam ◽  
J.T. Gau ◽  
M.L. Grove ◽  
B.A. Evans ◽  
M. Shuman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Tissue Bank ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prostate Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Correlative Microscopy ◽  
Client Server ◽  
Critical Elements ◽  
Transplant Organ

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of men in the United States and is the third leading cause of death in men. Despite attempts at early detection, there will be 244,000 new cases and 44,000 deaths from the disease in the United States in 1995. Therapeutic progress against this disease is hindered by an incomplete understanding of prostate epithelial cell biology, the availability of human tissues for in vitro experimentation, slow dissemination of information between prostate cancer research teams and the increasing pressure to “ stretch” research dollars at the same time staff reductions are occurring.To meet these challenges, we have used the correlative microscopy (CM) and client/server (C/S) computing to increase productivity while decreasing costs. Critical elements of our program are as follows:1) Establishing the Western Pennsylvania Genitourinary (GU) Tissue Bank which includes >100 prostates from patients with prostate adenocarcinoma as well as >20 normal prostates from transplant organ donors.

Digital image acquisition, processing, and analysis in a polymer microscopy laboratory

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 454-455
Author(s):  
Vinod K. Berry ◽  
Xiao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Image Analysis ◽  
Digital Image ◽  
Image Acquisition ◽  
Image Transmission ◽  
The United States ◽  
Quantitative Image Analysis ◽  
Quantitative Image

In recent years it became apparent that we needed to improve productivity and efficiency in the Microscopy Laboratories in GE Plastics. It was realized that digital image acquisition, archiving, processing, analysis, and transmission over a network would be the best way to achieve this goal. Also, the capabilities of quantitative image analysis, image transmission etc. available with this approach would help us to increase our efficiency. Although the advantages of digital image acquisition, processing, archiving, etc. have been described and are being practiced in many SEM, laboratories, they have not been generally applied in microscopy laboratories (TEM, Optical, SEM and others) and impact on increased productivity has not been yet exploited as well.In order to attain our objective we have acquired a SEMICAPS imaging workstation for each of the GE Plastic sites in the United States. We have integrated the workstation with the microscopes and their peripherals as shown in Figure 1.

Silence of the Land: On the Historical Irrelevance of Territory to Congressional Districting and Political Representation in the United States

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 53-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Rehfeld
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Political Representation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Representative Government ◽  
Congressional District ◽  
Congressional Districts ◽  
Communities Of Interest

Every ten years, the United States “constructs” itself politically. On a decennial basis, U.S. Congressional districts are quite literally drawn, physically constructing political representation in the House of Representatives on the basis of where one lives. Why does the United States do it this way? What justifies domicile as the sole criteria of constituency construction? These are the questions raised in this article. Contrary to many contemporary understandings of representation at the founding, I argue that there were no principled reasons for using domicile as the method of organizing for political representation. Even in 1787, the Congressional district was expected to be far too large to map onto existing communities of interest. Instead, territory should be understood as forming a habit of mind for the founders, even while it was necessary to achieve other democratic aims of representative government.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document