The Implicit Sexual Risk Assessment: A Pilot Study of a Novel Behavioral Task

Author(s):  
Kyle J. Walters ◽  
Michael K. Webb ◽  
Jeffrey S. Simons
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 201-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Hagan ◽  
David C. Perlman ◽  
Don C. Des Jarlais

Sexual Health ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaduzzaman Khan ◽  
David Plummer ◽  
Rafat Hussain ◽  
Victor Minichiello

Background: Physicians’ inadequate involvement in sexual risk assessment has the potential to miss many asymptomatic cases. The present study was conducted to explore sexual risk assessment by physicians in clinical practice and to identify barriers in eliciting sexual histories from patients. Methods: A stratified random sample of 15% of general practitioners (GP) from New South Wales was surveyed to assess their management of sexually transmissible infections (STI). In total, 409 GP participated in the survey with a response rate of 45.4%. Results: Although nearly 70% of GP regularly elicited a sexual history from commercial sex workers whose presenting complaint was not an STI, this history taking was much lower (<10%) among GP for patients who were young or heterosexual. About 23% never took a sexual history from Indigenous patients and 19% never elicited this history from lesbian patients. Lack of time was the most commonly cited barrier in sexual history taking (55%), followed by a concern that patients might feel uncomfortable if a sexual history was taken (49%). Other constraints were presence of another person (39%) and physician’s embarrassment (15%). About 19% of GP indicated that further training in sexual history taking could improve their practice. Conclusions: The present study identifies inconsistent involvement by GP in taking sexual histories, which can result in missed opportunities for early detection of many STI. Options for overcoming barriers to taking sexual histories by GP are discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 760-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Embregts ◽  
K. van den Bogaard ◽  
L. Hendriks ◽  
M. Heestermans ◽  
M. Schuitemaker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (700) ◽  
pp. e801-e808
Author(s):  
Emma O Billington ◽  
A Lynn Feasel ◽  
Jessica L VanDyke ◽  
Gregory A Kline

BackgroundDelivery of patient-centred care is limited by physician time. Group medical consultations may save physician time without compromising patient experience.AimTo assess patient experience and specialist physician time commitment in a group consultation for osteoporosis.Design and settingProspective pilot study at a tertiary osteoporosis centre in Canada between May 2016 and June 2019.MethodThe authors evaluated women referred for osteoporosis who chose a 2-hour group consultation instead of a one-to-one consultation. Group consultations were led by an osteoporosis nurse and specialist physician, and consisted of individualised fracture risk assessment and education regarding osteoporosis therapies, followed by a decision-making exercise to choose a treatment plan. Patients then followed up with their GPs to implement this plan. Patient experience was assessed via a questionnaire immediately and 3 months post-consultation, at which time GP satisfaction and patient treatment status were also surveyed.ResultsOf 560 referrals received, 18 patients declined osteoporosis specialist assessment, 54 could not be contacted, 303 attended a one-to- one consultation, and 185 attended a group consultation. Mean participant age was 62.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 5.8) and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) 10-year osteoporotic fracture risk was 13.0 (SD 7.0)%. Immediately post-consultation, 104 (97.2%) patients were satisfied and 102 (95.3%) felt included in decision making. Satisfaction was reported by 95/99 (96.0%) patients and 27/36 (75.0%) GPs. Treatment plans had been enacted by 90 (90.1%) patients. For a matched number of individual consultations, each group session conferred a specialist physician time savings of 5.5 hours.ConclusionGroup consultations represent a satisfactory and time-efficient alternative to one-to-one consultations for select patients with osteoporosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomotaka Nishizawa ◽  
Yuichi Niikura ◽  
Keiichi Akasaka ◽  
Masato Watanabe ◽  
Daisuke Kurai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document