A New Approach to Evaluation of Osteogenic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Ostanin ◽  
Ya. L. Petrovskiy ◽  
E. Ya. Shevela ◽  
E. V. Kurganova ◽  
A. N. Drobinskaja ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-357
Author(s):  
Jasmine J Wilson ◽  
Kerrie L Foyle ◽  
Jade Foeng ◽  
Todd Norton ◽  
Duncan R McKenzie ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e28321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Augusto Pessina ◽  
Arianna Bonomi ◽  
Valentina Coccè ◽  
Gloria Invernici ◽  
Stefania Navone ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
El-Mustapha Haddouti ◽  
Thomas M. Randau ◽  
Cäcilia Hilgers ◽  
Werner Masson ◽  
Klaus J. Walgenbach ◽  
...  

Currently, there is an increasing focus on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) as therapeutic option in bone pathologies as well as in general regenerative medicine. Although human MSCs have been extensively characterized and standardized, ovine MSCs are poorly understood. This limitation hampers clinical progress, as sheep are an excellent large animal model for orthopedic studies. Our report describes a direct comparison of human and ovine MSCs from three corresponding sources under the same conditions. All MSCs presented solid growth behavior and potent immunomodulatory capacities. Additionally, we were able to identify common positive (CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD166) and negative (CD14, CD34, CD45, HLA-DR) surface markers. Although both human and ovine MSCs showed strong osteogenic potential, direct comparison revealed a slower mineralization process in ovine MSCs. Regarding gene expression level, both human and ovine MSCs presented a comparable up-regulation of Runx2 and a trend toward down-regulation of Col1A during osteogenic differentiation. In summary, this side by side comparison defined phenotypic similarities and differences of human and ovine MSCs from three different sources, thereby contributing to a better characterization and standardization of ovine MSCs. The key findings shown in this report demonstrate the utility of ovine MSCs in preclinical studies for MSC-based therapies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Franco Bueno ◽  
Gerson Shigueru Kabayashi ◽  
Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro ◽  
Daniela Y. S. Tanikawa ◽  
Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bone reconstruction in congenital craniofacial differences, which affect about 2–3% of newborns, has long been the focus of intensive research in the field of bone tissue engineering. The possibility of using mesenchymal stromal cells in regenerative medicine protocols has opened a new field of investigation aimed at finding optimal sources of multipotent cells that can be isolated via non-invasive procedures. In this study, we analyzed whether levator veli palatini muscle fragments, which can be readily obtained in non-invasive manner during palatoplasty in cleft palate patients, represent a novel source of MSCs with osteogenic potential. Methods We obtained levator veli palatini muscle fragments (3–5 mm3), during surgical repair of cleft palate in 5 unrelated patients. Mesenchymal stromal cells were isolated from the muscle using a pre-plating technique and other standard practices. The multipotent nature of the isolated stromal cells was demonstrated via flow cytometry analysis and by induction along osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation pathways. To demonstrate the osteogenic potential of these cells in vivo, they were used to reconstruct a critical-sized full-thickness calvarial defect model in immunocompetent rats. Results Flow cytometry analysis showed that the isolated stromal cells were positive for mesenchymal stem cell antigens (CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105) and negative for hematopoietic (CD34 and CD45) or endothelial cell markers (CD31). The cells successfully underwent osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic cell differentiation under appropriate cell culture conditions. Calvarial defects treated with CellCeram™ scaffolds seeded with the isolated levator veli palatini muscle cells showed greater bone healing compared to defects treated with acellular scaffolds. Conclusion Cells derived from levator veli palatini muscle have phenotypic characteristics similar to other mesenchymal stromal cells, both in vitro and in vivo. Our findings suggest that these cells may have clinical relevance in the surgical rehabilitation of patients with cleft palate and other craniofacial anomalies characterized by significant bone deficit.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Cabrera-Pérez ◽  
Marta Monguió-Tortajada ◽  
Ana Gámez-Valero ◽  
Raquel Rojas-Márquez ◽  
Francesc Enric Borràs ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Orthopaedic diseases are one of the major targets for regenerative medicine. In this context, Wharton’s jelly (WJ) is an alternative source to bone marrow (BM) for allogeneic transplantation since its isolation does not require an invasive procedure for cell collection and does not raise major ethical concerns. However, the osteogenic capacity of human WJ-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) remains unclear. Methods Here, we compared the baseline osteogenic potential of MSC from WJ and BM cell sources by cytological staining, quantitative real-time PCR and proteomic analysis, and assessed chemical and biological strategies for priming undifferentiated WJ-MSC. Concretely, different inhibitors/activators of the TGFβ1-BMP2 signalling pathway as well as the secretome of differentiating BM-MSC were tested. Results Cytochemical staining as well as gene expression and proteomic analysis revealed that osteogenic commitment was poor in WJ-MSC. However, stimulation of the BMP2 pathway with BMP2 plus tanshinone IIA and the addition of extracellular vesicles or protein-enriched preparations from differentiating BM-MSC enhanced WJ-MSC osteogenesis. Furthermore, greater outcome was obtained with the use of conditioned media from differentiating BM-MSC. Conclusions Altogether, our results point to the use of master banks of WJ-MSC as a valuable alternative to BM-MSC for orthopaedic conditions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jooyoung Jung ◽  
Noory Moon ◽  
Ji-Yeon Ahn ◽  
Eun-Jee Oh ◽  
Myungshin Kim ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (8b) ◽  
pp. 2436-2447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Liu ◽  
Wei Seong Toh ◽  
Kai Lu ◽  
Paul Anthony MacAry ◽  
David Michael Kemeny ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1873-1873
Author(s):  
Christophe Martinaud ◽  
Christophe Desterke ◽  
Johanna Konopacki ◽  
Lisa Pieri ◽  
Rachel Golub ◽  
...  

Abstract Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal myeloproliferation, dysmegakaryopoiesis, extramedullary hematopoiesis associated with myelofibrosis and altered stroma in bone marrow and spleen. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are reported to play a pivotal role in fibrosis and stromal changes are considered as a reactive counterpart of the cytokine production by clonal hematopoietic cells. The present study shows that MSCs from patients demonstrate functional abnormalities that are unexpectedly maintained ex-vivo, in culture. Material and Methods: we studied MSCs and bone marrow sections from PMF patients (n=12) as compared to healthy donors (HDs) (n=6). We tested their proliferation, immunophenotype, hematopoiesis supporting capacities, differentiation abilities, in-vivo osteogenic assays, and performed secretome and transcriptome analysis. Results: We found that PMF-MSCs exhibit similar proliferative capacity and long-term hematopoiesis supporting abilities as compare to healthy donors. They overproduce interleukin 6, VEGF, RANTES, PDGF, BMP-2 and surprisingly TGF-beta1. MSCs from fibrotic PMF patients express high levels of glycosaminoglycans. Adipocytes and chondrocytes differentiation abilities were not different as compared to HDs but PMF-MSCs exhibit an increased in vitro potential. Implementation on scaffold in nude mice confirmed, in vivo, this increased osteogenic potential. We then looked into gene expression and discovered that PMF-MSCs show an original transcriptome signature related to osteogenic lineage and TGF-beta1. Indeed, osteogenic genes such as Runx2, Dlx5, Twist1, Noggin, Sclerostin, GDF5 and Serpine1 are deregulated and suggest a potential osteoprogenitor priming of PMF-MSCs. These molecular results also advocated for a TGF-beta1 impregnation that prompted us to study its impact on PMF-MSCs osteogenic differentiation. First, we then showed that Smad2 is intrinsically over-activated in PMF-MSC and that stimulation by TGF-beta1 is associated with an increase phospho-Smad2 level and an enhancement of bone master gene regulator Runx2 expression. Then, we inhibited TGF-beta1 pathway by by SB-431542 and evidenced a specific behavior of osteogenic MSCs differentiation in patients, suggesting involvement of TGF-beta1 in osteogenic impairment. Conclusion: Altogether, our results identify a signature of PMF-MSCs and suggest that they participate in PMF osteogenic dysregulation independently from in vivo local stimulation by clonal hematopoietic cells Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document