Use of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Assessment of Fracture Risk in Dialysis Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
S. O. Mazurenko ◽  
O. G. Mazurenko ◽  
A. A. Enkin ◽  
K. G. Staroselsky
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 3784-3791
Author(s):  
Kurt A Kennel ◽  
Jad G Sfeir ◽  
Matthew T Drake

Abstract Context The diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk prior to a sentinel fracture was transformed by the widespread clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Evidence Acquisition This review is based on a collection of primary and review literature gathered from a PubMed search of “dual energy X-ray absorptiometry,” “trabecular bone score,” and “atypical femur fracture” among other keywords. PubMed searches were supplemented by the authors’ prior knowledge of the subject. Evidence Synthesis While uncertainty exists for some aspects of osteoporosis care, patient and clinician familiarity with BMD assessment for screening and monitoring is firmly established. Beyond BMD, lateral spine images obtained with DXA can diagnose osteoporosis and refine fracture risk through the detection of unrecognized vertebral fractures. In addition, analysis of DXA lumbar spine images can reflect changes in trabecular bone microarchitecture, a component of bone “quality” that predicts risk of fracture independent of BMD. Finally, monitoring of bone health by DXA may be extended to include assessment of the femoral cortices for rare but serious adverse effects associated with antiresorptive therapies. Conclusions Increasing technologic sophistication requires additional consideration for how DXA imaging is performed, interpreted and applied to patient care. As with any test, clinicians must be familiar with DXA performance, pitfalls in analysis, and interpretation within each clinical context in which DXA is applied. With this perspective, care providers will be well positioned to contribute to continuous improvement of DXA performance and, in turn, quality of osteoporosis care.


Author(s):  
Sami P. Väänänen ◽  
Hanna Isaksson ◽  
Jukka S. Jurvelin

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) is generally considered to be the clinical gold standard to diagnose osteoporosis. However, BMD alone is only a moderate predictor of fracture risk. Finite element analyses (FEA) of bone mechanics can contribute to a more accurate prediction of fracture risk (Cody et al. 1999). However, CT imaging is relatively expensive and inflicts larger radiation doses on the patient.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0137535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Lundin ◽  
Faramarz Torabi ◽  
Maria Sääf ◽  
Lars-Erik Strender ◽  
Sven Nyren ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document