Mother–Child Attachment Patterns and Different Types of Anxiety Symptoms: Is There Specificity of Relations?

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 663-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Brumariu ◽  
Kathryn A. Kerns
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Minnis ◽  
Warren Read ◽  
Brenda Connolly ◽  
Amanda Burston ◽  
Tanja-Sabine Schumm ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Ferdinand ◽  
Natasja D.J. van Lang ◽  
Johan Ormel ◽  
Frank C. Verhulst

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-55
Author(s):  
Nazmi Mutlu Karakaş ◽  
Burcu Akın Sarı ◽  
Fatma Nur Baran Aksakal ◽  
Dilşad Foto Özdemir ◽  
Figen Şahin Dağlı

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-270
Author(s):  
Kathryn R. Giuseppone ◽  
Laura E. Brumariu

Purpose Previous literature demonstrated low-to-moderate rates of agreement between children and mothers regarding child anxiety. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate factors related to differences between mother-child dyads who disagreed vs agreed in their reports of child anxiety symptoms. Design/methodology/approach In total, 87 children aged 9-12 years old and their mothers completed questionnaires regarding maternal perceptions of child behavior, maternal separation anxiety about the child’s individuation, and mother-child relationship characteristics. Findings The results showed that mothers in mother-child dyads who disagreed on child anxiety symptoms, compared to those in dyads who agreed on child anxiety symptoms, perceived their children as showing higher affect intensity and behavioral problems. They also expressed greater anxiety about the children’s individuation process, characterized in part by children’s increased autonomy and decline of reliance on them. Further, children in dyads who disagreed, compared to those in dyads who agreed, reported lower mother-child attachment security. Originality/value The results extend the literature by identifying specific factors related to the discrepancy between mothers’ and children’s reports of childhood anxiety in early adolescence. The results highlight the need to consider both mothers’ and children’s views when assessing childhood anxiety. Importantly, the results also indicate that specific factors investigated in this study, including maternal perception of children’s behavioral problems and their affect intensity, maternal anxiety about child individuation, and mother-child attachment security, could be used to inform clinical decisions regarding informant discrepancies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
E.S. Dianova

Attachment theory currently covers more and more research areas. Starting its development with the study of children, now researchers of attachment are increasingly paying attention to the psyche of an adult. Moreover, more and more studies are devoted to the relationship of attachment and psychopathology. This article presents the scientific researches that have been carried out over the past five years and re-open the problem of attachment. The studies investigate the problems of romantic attachment, the effects of attachment on the course of pregnancy, the relationship of attachment and psychopathology in adults, the specificity of psychotherapy for patients with different types of attachment, and give a brief overview of studies of child attachment, which also focuses on psychopathology. This review doesn’t only present new scientific data on the theory of attachment, but also outlines new vectors of research on this issu.


2020 ◽  
pp. 003329412090551
Author(s):  
Fabiola Bizzi ◽  
Yael Shmueli-Goetz ◽  
Rosetta Castellano ◽  
Pietro San Martini ◽  
Donatella Cavanna

While attachment assessments developed for infancy and adulthood are well established, no such gold standard measure exists for school years, where measures are not yet sufficiently robust. Nevertheless, the last decade has witnessed some progress in this field with the development of the Child Attachment Interview (CAI), a semistructured interview designed to access children’s mental representations of their attachment relationships. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the CAI for an Italian population, using a normative group and a clinical group of disruptive behavior disorder and somatic symptom disorder patients. A total sample of 311 Italian children (213 normative and 98 clinical) aged 8 to 15 years completed a battery of measures assessing attachment, verbal IQ, and symptomatology. The psychometric properties of the CAI alongside other children (Kerns Security Scale, Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment) and parents (Adult Attachment Interview) attachment measures in normative sample, as well as the distribution of attachment patterns in normative and clinical samples, were examined. The results revealed the CAI to have adequate interrater and test–retest reliability, as well as discriminant, and convergent validity. Significant differences in the CAI’s distribution of attachment patterns for normative and specific clinical groups were found. Taken together, the findings show that the CAI Italian version is a reliable and valid measure for assessing attachment in school years and beyond.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Strand ◽  
Jordan J. Vossen ◽  
Erinn Savage

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document