scholarly journals Soil temperature responses to climate change along a gradient of upland–riparian transect in boreal forest

2017 ◽  
Vol 143 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 27-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
S . K. Oni ◽  
F. Mieres ◽  
M. N. Futter ◽  
H. Laudon
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 3615-3652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kim

Abstract. Winter and spring soil CO2 efflux-measurements represent a significant component in the assessment of annual carbon budgets of tundra and boreal forest ecosystems, as a response to climate change in the Arctic. This study was conducted to quantify CO2 efflux using a portable chamber system at representative sites along the trans-Alaska pipeline. The sites here are characterized as three tundra, two white spruce, and three black spruce forest sites during winter and spring seasons of 2010 to 2012; study of these sites will offer a better understanding of winter and spring carbon contributions to the annual carbon budget, as well as their affecting parameters by the effect of ablation ring in spring. 3 yr spring CO2 efflux depends on soil temperature at 5 cm depth on a regional scale. At their highest, Q10 values were 4.2 × 106, within the exposed tussock tundra of the upland tundra site, as tundra soils warmed from −0.9 to 0.5 °C, involving the soil microbial activity. With the forest census (400 m2) of the two white spruce forest sites, CO2 emissions were estimated to be 35 to 145 gC day−1 in winter and 56 to 1980 gC day−1 in spring, corresponding to 1–3 and 1–27% of annual carbon, respectively. The contributions from spring CO2 emissions are likely to increase as exposed soils widen in average length (major axis) from east, west, and south, as well as north-side length (minor axis). Considering the periods of winter and spring seasons across tundra and boreal forests, average winter- and spring-seasonal CO2 contributions to annual carbon budgets correspond roughly to 14–22% in tundra and 9–24% in boreal forest sites during 2011–2012. Contributions from spring carbon comparable to growing season CO2 emissions are sensitive to subtle changes at the onset of spring and during the snow-covered period in northern high latitudes, in response to recent Arctic climate change.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 6539-6552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kim

Abstract. Winter and spring soil CO2 efflux measurements represent a significant component in the assessment of annual carbon budgets of tundra and boreal forest ecosystems, reflecting responses to climate change in the Arctic. This study was conducted in order to quantify CO2 efflux, using a portable chamber system at representative sites along the Dalton Highway. Study sites included three tundra, two white spruce, and three black spruce forest locations during the winter and spring seasons of 2010–2012; the study of these sites promised better understanding of winter and spring carbon contributions to the annual carbon budget, as well as the respective ablation-ring effects during spring. Three-year spring CO2 efflux depends on soil temperature at 5 cm depth on a regional scale. At their highest, Q10 values were 4.2 × 106, within the exposed tussock tundra of the upland tundra site, which tundra soils warmed from −0.9 to 0.5 °C, involving soil microbial activity. From the forest census (400 m2) of the two white spruce forest sites, CO2 emissions were estimated as 0.09–0.36 gC m−2 day−1 in winter and 0.14–4.95 gC m−2 day−1 in spring, corresponding to 1–3% and 1–27% of annual carbon, respectively. Contributions from spring CO2 emissions are likely to increase as exposed soils widen in average length (major axis) from the east-, west-, south-, and north-side lengths (minor axis). Considering the periods of winter and spring seasons across tundra and boreal forests, average winter- and spring-seasonal CO2 contributions to annual carbon budgets correspond roughly to 14–22% for tundra and 9–24% for boreal forest sites during 2011 and 2012. Spring carbon contributions, such as growing season CO2 emissions, are sensitive to subtle changes at the onset of spring and during the snow-covered period in northern high latitudes, in response to recent Arctic climate change.


2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 977-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Boulanger ◽  
Anthony R. Taylor ◽  
David T. Price ◽  
Dominic Cyr ◽  
Guillaume Sainte-Marie
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (47) ◽  
pp. 11935-11940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan E. Butler ◽  
Nathaniel D. Mueller ◽  
Peter Huybers

Continuation of historical trends in crop yield are critical to meeting the demands of a growing and more affluent world population. Climate change may compromise our ability to meet these demands, but estimates vary widely, highlighting the importance of understanding historical interactions between yield and climate trends. The relationship between temperature and yield is nuanced, involving differential yield outcomes to warm (9−29 °C) and hot (>29 °C) temperatures and differing sensitivity across growth phases. Here, we use a crop model that resolves temperature responses according to magnitude and growth phase to show that US maize has benefited from weather shifts since 1981. Improvements are related to lengthening of the growing season and cooling of the hottest temperatures. Furthermore, current farmer cropping schedules are more beneficial in the climate of the last decade than they would have been in earlier decades, indicating statistically significant adaptation to a changing climate of 13 kg·ha−1· decade−1. All together, the better weather experienced by US maize accounts for 28% of the yield trends since 1981. Sustaining positive trends in yield depends on whether improvements in agricultural climate continue and the degree to which farmers adapt to future climates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-179

Soil respiration is a major component of global carbon cycle. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the environmental controls on soil respiration for evaluating potential response of ecosystems to climate change. In a temperate deciduous forest (located in Northern-Hungary) we added or removed aboveground and belowground litter to determine total soil respiration. We investigated the relationship between total soil CO2 efflux, soil moisture, and soil temperature. Soil CO2 efflux was measured at each plot using soda-lime method. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration (Q10) was monitored via measuring soil temperature on an hourly basis, while soil moisture was determined monthly. Soil respiration increased in control plots from the second year after implementing the treatment, but results showed fluctuations from one year to another. The effect of doubled litter was less significant than the effect of removal. Removed litter and root inputs caused substantial decrease in soil respiration. We found that temperature was more influential in the control of soil respiration than soil moisture. In plots with no litter Q10 varied in the largest interval. For treatment with doubled litter layer, temperature sensitivity of CO2 efflux did not change considerably. The effect of increasing soil temperature is more conspicuous to soil respiration in litter removal treatments since lack of litter causes greater irradiation. When exclusively leaf litter was considered, the effect of temperature on soil respiration was lower in treatments with added litter than with removed litter. Our results reveal that soil life is impacted by the absence of organic matter, rather than by an excess of organic matter. Results of CO2 emission from soils with different organic matter content can contribute to sustainable land use, considering the changed climatic factors caused by global climate change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document