scholarly journals CO2 capture through electro-conductive adsorbent using physical adsorption system for sustainable development

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1507-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Farooq ◽  
M. A. Saeed ◽  
M. Imran ◽  
G. M. Uddin ◽  
M. Asim ◽  
...  
ChemSusChem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
An-Hui Lu ◽  
Ru-Shuai Liu ◽  
Xiao-Dong Shi ◽  
Cheng-Tong Wang ◽  
Yu-Zhou Gao ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 1530001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinayak D. Ugale ◽  
Amol D. Pitale

Adsorption cooling system find its application in refrigeration, air conditioning, chiller, Ice making, etc. It uses thermal energy as driving force. Adsorption systems are environmental friendly (zero global warming potential and ozone depleting potential) and also eliminates use of compressor and minimize vibration problem. So it can be used as substitute for conventional vapor compression refrigeration system or vapor absorption system. The adsorption generally classified in two types as physical adsorption (due to weak van der waal forces) and chemical adsorption (chemical reaction between adsorbent and adsorbate form new molecules). The working pair of adsorber and adsorbate play vital role in the performance of adsorption system. Activated carbon, zeolite, silica gel are commonly used adsorber and water, ammonia, methanol and ethanol can be used as adsorbate. The poor heat and mass transfer performance of adsorption is major challenge for researchers. The heat transfer performance of adsorption system can be increased by increasing heat transfer area of adsorber bed i.e., design of new adsorber bed, while mass transfer performance is improved by use of new adsorbent with higher sorption rate. Composite adsorber solve the problem of heat and mass transfer performance of chemical adsorbents and adsorption quantity of physical adsorbents by combination of chemical and physical adsorbent but it can add some limitation with it. In this paper, various adsorption pair, their selection, design of adsorber bed, methods to improve thermal performance of adsorber bed is reviewed with their properties, advantages and limitations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 2173-2181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Pirklbauer ◽  
Gerhard Schöny ◽  
Florian Zerobin ◽  
Tobias Pröll ◽  
Hermann Hofbauer

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3530-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahag Voskian ◽  
T. Alan Hatton

Novel parallel passage adsorption system allows the electrochemical toggling of CO2 affinity for highly selective efficient carbon capture.


Author(s):  
Qin Chen ◽  
Ashok Rao ◽  
Scott Samuelsen

Existing coal fired power plants are expected to continue providing a significant portion of power generation and a majority of these are subcritical pulverized coal (PC) units which have higher CO2 emissions on a MWe basis due to their higher heat rates, while CO2 emissions are an increasing concern due to global pressure on limiting greenhouse gas accumulation in the atmosphere. Current state-of-the-art CO2 capture technology uses an aqueous amine solution to chemically absorb the CO2 from the flue gas and thus requires a large amount of energy for solvent regeneration. Novel solid sorbent based CO2 capture technologies are under development to capture the CO2 via physical adsorption and desorption, thereby consuming far less energy for the sorbent regeneration process. This present work is focused on retrofitting a subcritical PC power plant with solid sorbent post combustion CO2 capture technology. Thermal performance and costs are compared with an amine based CO2 capture plant as well as the plant with no CO2 capture. The design of the solid sorbent based CO2 capture system is optimized for integration to minimize plant modifications and the associated downtime. In an existing PC plant with a net power efficiency of 36.57%, use of the amine based capture reduces the net efficiency to 26.01% while with the solid sorbent based capture, the reduction in net efficiency is far less at 28.67% when 90% of the CO2 is captured. As a consequence, the increase in plant cooling duty is significantly lower for the solid sorbent CO2 capture case, with the water usage on a per MW basis being almost 17% lower than the amine based PC plant. The calculated levelized cost of electricity is increased from $60.5/MWh without CO2 capture to $124.3/MWh for amine based capture while that with the solid sorbent based capture is much lower at $115.8/MWh.


Author(s):  
Peter Orebech ◽  
Fred Bosselman ◽  
Jes Bjarup ◽  
David Callies ◽  
Martin Chanock ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document