scholarly journals Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Improves Clinical, Gestational, and Neonatal Outcomes in Advanced Maternal Age Patients Without Compromising Cumulative Live-Birth Rate.

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2493-2504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Sacchi ◽  
Elena Albani ◽  
Amalia Cesana ◽  
Antonella Smeraldi ◽  
Valentina Parini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

scholarly journals Different Strategies of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies in Women of Advanced Maternal Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3895
Author(s):  
Wei-Hui Shi ◽  
Zi-Ru Jiang ◽  
Zhi-Yang Zhou ◽  
Mu-Jin Ye ◽  
Ning-Xin Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Blastocyst Biopsy

Background: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is widely used in women of advanced maternal age (AMA). However, the effectiveness remains controversial. Method: We conducted a comprehensive literature review comparing outcomes of IVF with or without PGT-A in women of AMA in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in January 2021. All included trials met the criteria that constituted a randomized controlled trial for PGT-A involving women of AMA (≥35 years). Reviews, conference abstracts, and observational studies were excluded. The primary outcome was the live birth rate in included random control trials (RCTs). Results: Nine randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. For techniques of genetic analysis, three trials (270 events) performed with comprehensive chromosomal screening showed that the live birth rate was significantly higher in the women randomized to IVF/ICSI with PGT-A (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.65), which was not observed in six trials used with FISH as well as all nine trials. For different stages of embryo biopsy, only the subgroup of blastocyst biopsy showed a higher live birth rate in women with PGT-A (RR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.04–1.79). Conclusion: The application of comprehensive chromosome screening showed a beneficial effect of PGT-A in women of AMA compared with FISH. Moreover, blastocyst biopsy seemed to be associated with a better outcome than polar body biopsy and cleavage-stage biopsy.

P–606 A second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle rescues advanced-maternal-age patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts after the conventional approach by preventing treatment-discontinuation

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vaiarelli ◽  
D Cimadomo ◽  
S Colamaria ◽  
M Giuliani ◽  
C Argento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Ovarian Cycle ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

Abstract Study question Is double stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) a valuable strategy to rescue advanced-maternal-age patients obtaining ≤ 3 blastocysts for chromosomal-testing after conventional stimulation? Summary answer DuoStim is effective to prevent treatment discontinuation thereby increasing the 1-year cumulative-live-birth-rate among advanced-maternal-age patients obtaining 0–3 blastocysts after a first conventional stimulation. What is known already Folliculogenesis is characterized by continuous waves of follicular growth. DuoStim approach exploits these dynamics to conduct two stimulations in a single ovarian cycle and improve the prognosis of advanced-maternal-age and/or reduced-ovarian-reserve women. Independent groups worldwide successfully adopted DuoStim with various regimens reporting similar oocyte/embryo competence after both stimulations. Recently, we have demonstrated the fruitful adoption of DuoStim in patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria, especially because of the prevention of treatment discontinuation. Here we aimed at investigating whether DuoStim can be adopted to rescue poor prognosis patients obtaining 0–3 blastocysts after the conventional approach. Study design, size, duration Proof-of-concept matched case-control study. All patients obtaining 0–3 blastocysts after conventional-stimulation between 2015–2018 were proposed DuoStim. The 143 couples who accepted were matched for maternal age, sperm factor, cumulus-oocyte-complexes and blastocysts obtained after the first stimulation to 143 couples who did not. The primary outcome was the 1-year cumulative-live-birth-rate. If not delivering, the control group had 1 year to undergo a second attempt with conventional-stimulation. All treatments were concluded (live-birth achieved or no euploid left). Participants/materials, setting, methods Only GnRH-antagonist with recombinant-gonadotrophins and agonist trigger stimulation protocols were adopted. All cycles entailed ICSI with ejaculated sperm, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, comprehensive-chromosome-testing and vitrified-warmed euploid single-embryo-transfer(s). Cumulative-live-birth-rate was calculated per patient considering both stimulations in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim group) or up to two stimulations in 1 year (control group). Treatment discontinuation rate in the control group was calculated as patients who did not return for a second stimulation among non-pregnant ones. Main results and the role of chance Among the 286 couples included (41.0±2.9yr;4.9±3.1 cumulus-oocytes-complexes and 0.8±0.9 blastocysts), 126 (63 per group), 98 (49 per group), 52 (26 per group) and 10 (5 per group) obtained 0,1,2 and 3 blastocysts after the first stimulation, respectively. The cumulative-live-birth-rate was 9% in the control group after the first attempt (N = 13/143). Among the 130 non-pregnant patients, only 12 returned within 1-year (165±95days later;discontinuation rate=118/130,91%), and 3 delivered. Thus, the cumulative-live-birth-rate from two stimulations in 1-year was 11% (N = 16/143). In the DuoStim group, the cumulative-live-birth-rate was 24% (N = 35/143; Fisher’s-exact-test< 0.01,power=80%). The odds-ratio of delivering in the DuoStim versus the control group adjusted for all matching criteria was 3.3,95%CI:1.6–7.0,p<0.01. This difference (0%,22%,15% and 20% in the control versus 10%,31%,46% and 40% in the DuoStim group among patients obtaining 0,1,2 and 3 blastocysts at the first stimulation, respectively) is mainly due to treatment discontinuation in the control group (98%,65%,77% and 80% among patients obtaining 0,1,2 and 3 blastocysts at the first stimulation, respectively) and the further increased maternal age at the time of second retrieval (∼6 months). Notably, 2 patients delivered 2 live-births after DuoStim (none in the control) and 14 patients with a live-birth have euploid blastocysts left (2 in the control). Limitations, reasons for caution Randomized-controlled-trials and cost-effectiveness analyses are desirable to confirm these data. Moreover, 75% of the patients included were >39yr and 44% obtained no blastocyst after the first stimulation. Therefore future studies among younger women and/or more women obtaining ≥1 blastocyst are advisable to set reasonable cut-off values to apply this strategy. Wider implications of the findings: A second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle might be envisioned as a rescue strategy for poor IVF outcomes after a first stimulation, so to prevent treatment discontinuation and increase the cumulative-live-birth-rate. This is feasible since 6–7 days span the first and the second stimulation in the DuoStim protocol. Trial registration number none

scholarly journals CUMULATIVE LIVE BIRTH RATE IN WOMEN 37 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS WHO UTILIZE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING-ANEUPLOIDY (PGT-A) VERSUS UNTESTED EMBRYOS

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e417-e418
Author(s):  
Rachel B. Mejia ◽  
Karen M. Summers ◽  
Abigail C. Mancuso ◽  
Emily A. Capper ◽  
Patrick Ten Eyck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

scholarly journals Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016–2018

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn D. Sanders ◽  
Giuseppe Silvestri ◽  
Tony Gordon ◽  
Darren K. Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Treatment Cycle ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Traffic Light ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Abstract Purpose To examine the live birth and other outcomes reported with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the United Kingdom (UK) Human Embryology and Fertilization Authority (HFEA) data collection. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted following freedom of information (FoI) requests to the HFEA for the PGT-A and non-PGT-A cycle outcomes for 2016–2018. Statistical analysis of differences between PGT-A and non-PGT-A cycles was performed. Other than grouping by maternal age, no further confounders were controlled for; fresh and frozen transfers were included. Results Outcomes collected between 2016 and 2018 included total number of cycles, cycles with no embryo transfer, total number of embryos transferred, live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transferred and live birth rate per treatment cycle. Data was available for 2464 PGT-A out of a total 190,010 cycles. LBR per embryo transferred and LBR per treatment cycle (including cycles with no transfer) were significantly higher for all PGT-A vs non-PGT-A age groups (including under 35), with nearly all single embryo transfers (SET) after PGT-A (significantly more in non-PGT-A) and a reduced number of transfers per live birth particularly for cycles with maternal age over 40 years. Conclusion The retrospective study provides strong evidence for the benefits of PGT-A in terms of live births per embryo transferred and per cycle started but is limited in terms of matching PGT-A and non-PGT-A cohorts (e.g. in future studies, other confounders could be controlled for). This data challenges the HFEA “red traffic light” guidance that states there is “no evidence that PGT-A is effective or safe” and hence suggests the statement be revisited in the light of this and other new data.

scholarly journals Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e042395
Author(s):  
Simone Cornelisse ◽  
Liliana Ramos ◽  
Brigitte Arends ◽  
Janneke J Brink-van der Vlugt ◽  
Jan Peter de Bruin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
Cleavage Stage ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Superiority Trial

IntroductionIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development, for example, transferring embryos at blastocyst stage instead of cleavage stage. However, it still is not known which embryo transfer policy in IVF is more efficient in terms of cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), following a fresh and the subsequent frozen–thawed transfers after one oocyte retrieval. Furthermore, studies reporting on obstetric and neonatal outcomes from both transfer policies are limited.Methods and analysisWe have set up a multicentre randomised superiority trial in the Netherlands, named the Three or Fivetrial. We plan to include 1200 women with an indication for IVF with at least four embryos available on day 2 after the oocyte retrieval. Women are randomly allocated to either (1) control group: embryo transfer on day 3 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 3 or 4, or (2) intervention group: embryo transfer on day 5 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6. The primary outcome is the cLBR per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes include LBR following fresh transfer, multiple pregnancy rate and time until pregnancy leading a live birth. We will also assess the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, costs and patients’ treatment burden.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands in June 2018 (CCMO NL 64060.000.18). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed and in open access journals.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Register (NL 6857).

Reduced spontaneous abortion and increased live birth rate after PGD for advanced maternal age

2007 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. S85-S86 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Munne ◽  
J. Garrisi ◽  
F. Barnes ◽  
L. Werlin ◽  
W. Schoolcraft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spontaneous Abortion ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document