scholarly journals Perioperative coronary artery spasms in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Hachisuka ◽  
Yuhi Fujimoto ◽  
Eiichiro Oka ◽  
Hiroshi Hayashi ◽  
Teppei Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Smoking Habit ◽  
Ablation Procedure ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Life Threatening

Abstract Purpose Catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Although coronary artery spasms (CAS) during or after ablation procedures have been described as a rare complication in some case reports, the incidence and characteristics of this complication have not been fully elucidated. The present observational study aimed to clarify the CAS in a large number of patients experiencing AF ablation. Methods A total of 2913 consecutive patients (male: 78%, mean 66 ± 10 years) who underwent catheter ablation of AF were enrolled. Results Nine patients (0.31%, mean 66 ± 10 years, 7 males) had transient ST-T elevation (STE). Eight out of the 9 patients had STE in the inferior leads. STE occurred after the transseptal puncture in 7 patients, after the sheath was pulled out of the left atrium in 1, and 2 h after the ablation procedure in 1. Six patients had definite angiographic CAS without any sign of an air embolization on the emergent coronary angiography. In the3 other patients, the STE improved either directly after an infusion of nitroglycerin or spontaneously before the CAG. The patients with CAS had a higher frequency of a smoking habit (89% vs. 53%; P = .04), smaller left atrial diameter (36 ± 6 vs. 40 ± 7; P = .07), and lower CHADS2 score (0.6 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 1.1; P = .004) than those without. Conclusions Although the incidence was rare (0.31%), CAS should be kept in mind as a potentially life-threatening complication throughout an AF ablation procedure especially performed under conscious sedation.

scholarly journals Short coupling with high burden of atrial ectopy in twenty-four hour holter recording predicts recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after atrial fibrillation ablation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Okajima ◽  
H Imai ◽  
Y Murase ◽  
N Kano ◽  
Y Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Atrial Arrhythmia ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Ablation Procedure ◽  
High Burden ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Atrial Ectopy ◽  
Holter Recordings

Abstract Background Atrial arrhythmia recurrence is experienced in up to 20% of patients after initially receiving a catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, it is important to define predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Atrial ectopy (AE) with short coupling interval (S-AE) has been reported to be a trigger of AF. On the other hand, high burden of AE has been reported to be a useful predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrences after AF ablation. Thus, the combination of the incidence of S-AE and AE burden during a 24-hour Holter recording could be a useful predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation. Purpose To investigate this hypothesis, we performed a retrospective case-controlled study. Methods We enrolled 180 patients who underwent their first catheter ablation procedure for AF and performed a 24-hour Holter recording between 90 to 365 days after their ablation procedure. Patients who performed an additional ablation procedure before the Holter recording were excluded. Finally, we analyzed 173 patients (age: 65±10 years, female: 28.3%, non-paroxysmal: 27.7%). The Holter recordings were analyzed by the same experienced technicians. We defined AE as a narrow QRS complex occurring >25% than prior R-R interval, and S-AE as AE occurring >55% earlier than expected. The relationship between the characteristics of AE during the Holter recording and atrial arrhythmia recurrences was investigated. Results The Holter recordings were performed at a median of 103 (IQR: 98–138) days after ablation. The median number of AE were 144 (IQR: 54–699) beats per day, and S-AE was recorded in 49 patients (28.3%). Forty-two patients (24.3%) had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia during a median 488-day follow up period. Patients with S-AE had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia more frequently than those without S-AE (44.9% vs 16.1%, p<0.001). We found the cut-off point of AE burden as 241 beats per day by the receiver operating characteristic curve with 74% sensitivity and 70% specificity to predict atrial arrhythmia recurrence. We divided the patients into four groups according to the presence or absence of S-AE and high AE burden. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with S-AE and high AE burden had the highest atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate (Log-rank test: p<0.001). In the Cox multivariate analysis, S-AE with high AE burden was an independent predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 4.27, 95% CI: 2.32–7.85, p<0.001). Conclusion For AF patients who underwent their first catheter ablation, S-AE (>55% earlier than expected) with high AE burden (>241 beats per day) during the 24-hour Holter recording predicted recurrences of atrial arrhythmia. These results can help to develop follow-up strategies after AF ablation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Protection of the Esophagus During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Houmsse ◽  
Emile Daoud
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Esophageal Injury ◽  
Ablation Procedure ◽  
High Occurrence ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Important Concern

Esophageal injury still occurs with high frequency during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study is to provide a review of methods to protect the esophagus from injury during AF ablation. Despite advances in imaging and ablation, the potential risk of esophageal injury during AF ablation remains an important concern with a high occurrence of esophageal injury (≈15%). There have been numerous studies evaluating varied techniques for esophageal protection including active cooling and displacement of the esophagus. These techniques are reviewed in this manuscript as well as the role of esophageal protection in managing patients undergoing AF ablation procedure.

scholarly journals Incidence of Esophageal Thermal Injury Using a Safety Protocol During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-218
Author(s):  
Anibal Pires Borges ◽  
Guilherme Ferreira Gazzoni ◽  
José Plutarco Gutierrez Yanez ◽  
Karina de Andrade ◽  
Celine de Oliveira Boff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Esophageal Perforation ◽  
Thermal Injury ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Esophageal Injury ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Af Recurrence

Objective: Catheter ablation has been a common procedure used for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrioesophagel fistula (AEF) is one of the most feared complications of AF ablation. Although it is a rare complication, severe esophageal thermal injury must be avoided. It is important to describe a safe method of preventing esophageal injuries without increasing AF recurrence. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency AF catheter ablation during 1 year-period wa conducted. One hundred and four patients were enrolled divided in two groups: one with a maximum recorded esophageal temperature (ET) < 38 °C and other with a maximum recorded ET ≥ 38 °C. The primary endpoint was detection of endoscopic esophageal lesions after AF ablation and the secondary endpoint was AF recurrence according to the maximum ET reached during the procedure. Results: The maximum ET was on average 37.3 ± 1.0 °C. Only 4 (3.8%) patients had esophageal lesion diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. There were no cases of esophageal perforation. The AF recurrence rate was 9.6% during the follow-up (10 patients, 3 from the ET max < 38 °C group and 7 from the ET max ≥ 38 °C group; p = 0.181). The maximum ET was not associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 0.84-3.24, p = 0.14). Conclusions: A low incidence of esophageal injury after AF ablation with the use of a specific esophageal protection protocol was found. There was no esophageal perforation. The AF recurrence rate was similar to that described in the literature.

Abstract 5663: Intracardiac Echocardiography From Within the Left Atrium Improves the Accuracy of Image Integration During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheldon M Singh ◽  
E. Kevin Heist ◽  
David M Donaldson ◽  
Theofanie Mela ◽  
Jeremy N Ruskin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Atrium ◽  
Intracardiac Echocardiography ◽  
Surface Registration ◽  
List Type ◽  
Image Integration ◽  
Ablation Procedure ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Integration Error

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can be integrated with pre-procedural CT or MR imaging to direct catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Prior work has described ICE imaging of the left atrium (LA) with the ICE probe in the RA, but it is feasible to image the LA from an ICE probe placed directly into the LA via a trans-septal puncture performed for the mapping/ablation procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine whether direct LA imaging with ICE results in improved image integration during AF ablation compared with LA imaging indirectly from the RA. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing an AF ablation procedure with the CARTO-Sound system were studied. A 10 French phased array catheter with an embedded CARTO navigation sensor was employed to provide 2D echocardiogram images of the LA - 13 patients underwent imaging from the RA alone and 12 patients from the LA. The accuracy of the image integration was assessed by the average integration error after surface registration and the requirement to take supplementary electroanatomic mapping points to obtain acceptable image integration. Results: Twenty-five patients (56% paroxysmal AF, average LA size = 42±8 mm, average EF = 63±10 %) were examined. There was no difference in the time or number of ultrasound contours required to create a LA anatomic map with ICE imaging from the RA versus the LA (24±17min vs. 24±25min, P=1.0, 24±16 contours vs. 29±18 contours, P=0.5). The average integration error for all patients was 2.19±0.59mm. Direct LA imaging was associated with improved integration error compared to indirect LA imaging from the RA (1.85±0.33mm versus 2.51±0.62mm, P=0.004). Image integration using RA acquired LA images had a tendency to be less accurate resulting in the primary operator acquiring additional registration points to supplement the registration process (patients requiring additional registration points for registration: 3/12 for LA imaging versus 9/13 for RA imaging of the LA, P=0.05). Conclusion: Direct ICE imaging from within the LA is feasible and associated with improved accuracy of image integration during AF ablation.

Ion Channel Remodelling in Atrial Fibrillation

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Voigt ◽  
Dobromir Dobrev ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ion Channel ◽  
Antiarrhythmic Drugs ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Large Size ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with substantial cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with stroke being the most critical complication. Present drugs used for the therapy of AF (antiarrhythmics and anticoagulants) have major limitations, including incomplete efficacy, risks of life-threatening proarrhythmic events and bleeding complications. Non-pharmacological ablation procedures are efficient and apparently safe, but the very large size of the patient population allows ablation treatment of only a small number of patients. These limitations largely result from limited knowledge about the underlying mechanisms of AF and there is a hope that a better understanding of the molecular basis of AF may lead to the discovery of safer and more effective therapeutic targets. This article reviews the current knowledge about AF-related ion-channel remodelling and discusses how these alterations might affect the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Posterior circulation stroke: an easily overlooked complication of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e234661
Author(s):  
Tahir Nazir ◽  
Mohiuddin Sharief ◽  
James Farthing ◽  
Irfan M Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Cerebellar Infarction ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Posterior Circulation Stroke ◽  
Ventricular Response

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has established itself as a safe and proven rhythm control strategy for selected patients with AF over the past decade. Thromboembolic complications of catheter ablation are becoming rare in anticoagulated patients with a risk of stroke reported as 0.3%. A particular challenge is posed by clinical presentation due to ischaemic stroke involving the posterior circulation following catheter ablation because of its substantial differences from the carotid territory stroke, making the timely diagnosis and treatment very difficult. It is crucial to keep an index of clinical suspicion in patients presenting with neurological deficits related to vertebrobasilar circulation following ablation. We describe the case of a man who presented with dizziness and palpitations after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. He was found to be in AF with a rapid ventricular response. His dizziness was initially attributed to the cardiac dysrhythmia. As his symptoms continued despite heart rate control, he underwent further investigations and was eventually diagnosed with a posterior circulation stroke resulting in left cerebellar infarction. He was treated with antiplatelet therapy and improved significantly over the following few days. We review and present an up-to-date brief literature review on the complications of catheter ablation of AF and describe pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment options for posterior circulation stroke after AF ablation. This case aims to raise awareness among clinicians about posterior circulation stroke after AF ablation.

scholarly journals B-PO05-104 UTILITY OF ISOPROTERENOL INFUSION DURING CATHETER ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: INSIGHTS FROM THE UC SAN DIEGO AF ABLATION REGISTRY

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S414
Author(s):  
Omar Mahmoud Aldaas ◽  
Douglas Darden ◽  
Praneet S. Mylavarapu ◽  
Frederick T. Han ◽  
Kurt S. Hoffmayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
San Diego ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Isoproterenol Infusion

scholarly journals Randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine–remifentanil and midazolam–fentanyl for deep sedation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Choi ◽  
Sung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Ju Youn Kim ◽  
Youmi Hwang ◽  
Tae-Seok Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Hemodynamic Compromise ◽  
3D Mapping System ◽  
Sedative Agents

Abstract Background and objectives The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well established. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sedation using dexmedetomidine with remifentanil compared to conventional sedative agents during RFCA for AF. Subjects and methods A total of 240 patients undergoing RFCA for AF were randomized to either the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group (continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil) or the midazolam (MID) group (intermittent injections of midazolam and fentanyl) according to sedative agents. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was applied to all patients during the procedure. The primary outcome was patient movement during the procedure resulting in a 3D mapping system discordance, and the secondary outcome was adverse events including respiratory or hemodynamic compromise. Results During AF ablation, the incidence of the primary outcome was significantly reduced for the DEX group (18.2% vs. 39.5% in the DEX and the MID groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The frequency of a desaturation event (oxygen saturation < 90%) did not significantly differ between the two groups (6.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.056). However, the incidences of hypotension not owing to cardiac tamponade (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg, 19.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.011) and bradycardia (HR < 50 beats/min: 39.7% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.003) were higher in the DEX group. All efficacy and safety results were consistent within the predefined subgroups. Conclusion The combined use of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil provides higher stability sedation during AF ablation, but can lead to more frequent hemodynamic compromise compared to midazolam and fentanyl.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document