The Role of Nuclear Power in Reducing Risk of the Fossil Fuel Prices and Diversity of Electricity Generation in Tunisia: A Portfolio Approach

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-207
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ben Abdelhamid ◽  
Chaker Aloui ◽  
Corinne Chaton ◽  
Jomâa Souissi
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo-Jin Kim ◽  
Jeong-Joon Yu ◽  
Seung-Hoon Yoo

In an era of energy transition involving an increase in renewable energy and a reduction in coal-fired power generation and nuclear power generation, the role of combined heat and power (CHP) as a bridging energy is highly emphasized. This article attempts to look empirically into the impact of increasing the share of renewable energy in total electricity generation on CHP share in total electricity generation in a cross-country context. Data from 35 countries during the period 2009–2015 were used, and the least absolute deviations estimator was applied to obtain a more robust parameter estimate. The results showed that a 1%p increase in the share of renewable energy significantly increased the CHP share by 0.87%p. Therefore, the hypothesis that CHP serves as bridge energy in the process of energy transition was established.


2014 ◽  
Vol 554 ◽  
pp. 531-535
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Behrouzi ◽  
Adi Maimun Abdul Malik ◽  
Mehdi Nakisa ◽  
Yasser Mohamed Ahmed

Climate changing, electrical demands, rising diesel fuel prices, as well as fossil fuel-based energy is limited and in fact is depleting ,are subjects to use of renewable technologies. Among the different renewable energy technologies, hydro power generation (large and small scale) is the prime choice in terms of contribution to the world's electricity generation by using water current turbines.CFD simulation using two equations turbulence model was carried out to compare performance of conventional savonius turnine and new consept of vertical axis turbine. This study was coducted to reach suitable desigh of vertical axis turbines for capturing more kineticenergy of current via of others esspecially,low current speed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Duncan

Australia is dependent on fossil fuel and exports significant quantities of coal and gas. Additionally, it has major uranium reserves and is the world's second largest exporter. It has one research reactor but no nuclear power electricity generation. Until 2007, Australia declined to endorse the Kyoto Protocol but has volunteered to limit the growth of CO2 emissions. This paper considers the greenhouse debate and nuclear energy. It concludes that whether the cause of global warming is the use of fossil fuel or solar activity, the remedy is the same. Reducing CO2 in the atmosphere will allow more heat to escape to space. Reducing the use of fossil fuel will reduce atmospheric CO2. For environmental, economic and global reasons the more populated Australian states should now consider the use of nuclear powered electricity generation.


In the 20 years since the Calder Hall reactors were ordered, the U.K. has accumulated wide experience of building and operating nuclear power stations. Early stations proved expensive because of technological novelty and infrequent orders, but the economics of nuclear power stations where regular orders can be assured are increasingly favourable. Other factors do not provide fundamental limitations to nuclear power growth. Trends in fossil-fuel prices suggest that most utilities will look mainly to nuclear plant to meet their electricity requirements. The substantial savings of fossil fuel already achieved will thus grow rapidly on a world-wide basis. Though it would take quite unexpected shifts in relative economics for nuclear stations completely to supplant conventional stations, particularly for peak demand situations, a high nuclear share of new capacity may begin to throw some strain on uranium reserves in the 1980s. The fast reactor, prototypes of which after long and careful development are commissioning in France, Russia and the U.K., can provide a huge increase obtainable from uranium resources, pending the successful introduction in the long term of fusion reactors.


Significance Recent increases in fossil fuel prices have reinforced such claims by raising considerations of cost-effectiveness and energy security. Impacts Pressure from pro-nuclear EU states will see nuclear power treated as a sustainable energy resource alongside other low-carbon options. High fossil fuel prices appear to enhance the case for nuclear, but their impacts may be relatively transient if prices fall back. Lasting high prices, bringing higher inflation and interest rates, may affect financing costs, hitting new nuclear investments’ viability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroto Shiraki ◽  
Masahiro Sugiyama ◽  
Yuhji Matsuo ◽  
Ryoichi Komiyama ◽  
Shinichiro Fujimori ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Japanese power system has unique characteristics with regard to variable renewable energies (VREs), such as higher costs, lower potentials, and less flexibility with the grid connection compared to other major greenhouse-gas-emitting countries. We analyzed the role of renewable energies (REs) in the future Japanese power sector using the results from the model intercomparison project Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 35 Japan Model Intercomparison Project (JMIP) using varying emission reduction targets and key technological conditions across scenarios. We considered the uncertainties for future capital costs of solar photovoltaics, wind turbines, and batteries in addition to the availability of nuclear and carbon dioxide capture and storage. The results show that REs supply more than 40% of electricity in most of the technology sensitivity scenarios (median 51.0%) when assuming an 80% emission reduction in 2050. The results (excluding scenarios that assume the continuous growth of nuclear power and/or the abundant availability of domestic biomass and carbon-free hydrogen) show that the median VRE shares reach 52.2% in 2050 in the 80% emission reduction scenario. On the contrary, the availability of newly constructed nuclear power, affordable biomass, and carbon-free hydrogen can reduce dependence on VREs to less than 20%. The policy costs were much more sensitive to the capital costs and resource potential of VREs than the battery cost uncertainties. Specifically, while the doubled capital costs of VRE resulted in a 13.0% (inter-model median) increase in the policy cost, the halved capital costs of VREs reduced 8.7% (inter-model median) of the total policy cost. These results imply that lowering the capital costs of VREs would be effective in achieving a long-term emission reduction target considering the current high Japanese VRE costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document