In three cores from an acidic lake in the Adirondack State Park of New York, iron cycling accounted for diagenetic enrichment of up to 14% of sediment dry mass. The accuracy of the sediment accumulation rates calculated from the constant rate of supply (c.r.s.) model and the dating and sediment accumulation rates calculated from the constant initial concentration (c.i.c.) 210Pb models were affected by post-depositional movement of iron about the sediment–water interface and through the sediment. Dating biases from iron diagenesis reached as high as 57% and biases to calculated sediment accumulation rates ranged up to approximately 15%. In general, however, the difference between the iron-corrected and uncorrected dating was not much greater than the error expected from routine analytical precision. However, under circumstances of low sediment accumulation rates and high iron enrichment, significant deviations in dating and sediment accumulation calculations for both c.r.s. and c.i.c. 210Pb models may become noteworthy.
Accumulation Rates Using the 210Pb Dating Method in a Sediment Core of the Cispatá Bay, a Marine Protected Area in the Southwestern Colombian Caribbean