State Verification Scheme for Measuring Instruments to Measure AC and DC Electrical Resistance

Author(s):  
M. D. Klionsky ◽  
I. A. Samodurov
2021 ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Mark D. Klionsky ◽  
Igor A. Samodurov

The need to develop a new state verification scheme (SVS) is caused by the emergence of high-precision bridges, resistance measures and boxes with a low temperature coefficient (0,02–0,5) ppm/К, highly stable transient measures, electronic resistance calibrators, and high frequency resistance measures. Recommendations how to assign the status of a working standard to measures, R-meters and measuring shunts with accuracy from 0,005 % to 0,500 %, sufficient for verification of measuring instruments, are given. SVS consists of two parts: part 1 covers electrical resistance measures, boxes and R-meters, part 2 – to measuring shunts and shunt resistance meters. Part 2 was introduced to the SVS for the first time. The revised indicators of accuracy for working standards of all levels are considered, conditions for the investigation of measuring instruments for assigning the status of a working standard, criteria for assessing metrological characteristics are given.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Medvedevskikh ◽  
A. S. Sergeeva ◽  
M. P. Krasheninina ◽  
O. S. Shokhina

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-303
Author(s):  
M. D. Klionskii ◽  
Yu. P. Semenov

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 730-730
Author(s):  
M. D. Klionskii ◽  
Yu. P. Semenov

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 299-306
Author(s):  
Konstantin A. Shakalov ◽  
Nadezhda A. Vikhareva

The article provides a comparative analysis of the canceled, current and draft new version of the state verification scheme for measuring the mass and volume of liquid in the flow. The prerequisites and reasons for making changes are considered, as well as the estimated consequences of the changes made for the metrological services using standards and instruments for measuring the mass and volume of liquid in the flow.


1978 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 271-278
Author(s):  
Chr. Kühne

The PZT according to MARKOWITZ, undoubtedly one of the most accurate measuring instruments, has become an integral part of astronomy in the last years. Yet there are two reasons why I still tried to improve the MARKOWITZ basic idea.For the MARKOWITZ process the use of a lens objective is imperative. Because of the diameter limitations of the lens objectives the magnitude is reduced. Although a 65 cm PZT has been put into operation in Washington recently, the thermal difficulties encountered made it necessary to control the temperature actively. In addition, the 65 cm diameter of a lens equipped with 4 elements can be considered as the very limit, but not for a mirror system.In addition there are still more disadvantages using lens objectives. The useable field is restricted by astigmatism, reducing the range of declination. The transmission, especially in the blue wavelengths, decreases very rapidly with the thickness of lenses. For large multilens objectives the transmission is less than for a mirror system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document