scholarly journals Make Way for the Robots! Human- and Machine-Centricity in Constituting a European Public–Private Partnership

Minerva ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-69
Author(s):  
Kjetil Rommetveit ◽  
Niels van Dijk ◽  
Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir

Abstract This article is an analytic register of recent European efforts in the making of ‘autonomous’ robots to address what is imagined as Europe’s societal challenges. The paper describes how an emerging techno-epistemic network stretches across industry, science, policy and law to legitimize and enact a robotics innovation agenda. Roadmap is the main metaphor and organizing tool in working across the disciplines and sectors, and in aligning these heterogeneous actors with a machine-centric vision along a path to make way for ‘new kinds’ of robots. We describe what happens as this industry-dominated project docks in a public–private partnership with pan-European institutions and a legislative initiative on robolaw. Emphasizing the co-production of robotics and European innovation politics, we observe how well-known uncertainties and scholarly debates about machine capabilities and human–machine configurations, are unexpectedly played out in legal scholarship and institutions as a controversy and a significant problem for human-centered legal frameworks. European robotics are indeed driving an increase in speculative ethics and a new-found weight of possible futures in legislative practice.

Author(s):  
Arie Gottfried ◽  
Paolo Piantanida ◽  
Antonio C. Devito

This article addresses the issue of Public–Private Partnership (PPP) as a potential tool for urban renewal, in view of budget constraints and a lack of financial resources that affect public authority. In fact, there is increasing application of PPP, driven mainly by municipalities and other local-level entities. The paper reports on two analyses. The first is a comparative study of 15 cases in Italy. The second is research on experiences in two districts of Budapest, Hungary. These analyses offer proposals to facilitate the application of PPP tools, in light of the Italian technical standard UNI/TS 11453 of 2012. This way it is possible to develop a methodology to properly assess the feasibility and financial viability of a project, ensuring transparency in the execution of European public works.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-540
Author(s):  
Lydia Natalia ◽  
Nanny Dewi Tanzil ◽  
Prima Yusi Sari

Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is one of the schemes that have inspired many countries in infrastructure development. One of the most discussed PPP topics by researchers is the concept of Critical Success Factors (CSF). Therefore, this study examines CSF publications for PPP projects from selected journal sites from 2000-2019. The results showed that research on CSF in PPP began to increase in 2012. The most identified CSFs were appropriate risk allocation and sharing, competitive and transparent procurement processes, favorable and efficient legal frameworks, commitment and responsibility of the public and private sectors, and a robust and reliable private consortium. Furthermore, it was also found that most countries that were the objects of research on PPP CSF were China, followed by Hong Kong and Australia. The results also show that the dominant research focuses on multi-sector types of infrastructure where CSF can be applied to all infrastructure sectors. The findings obtained in this study can provide an overview of CSFs for projects with PPP schemes in the future. Besides, the identified CSFs can be applied to any PPP infrastructure sector. They can assist stakeholders in increasing the likelihood of PPP project success and can be adopted for further research


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Temulin Batjargal ◽  
Mengzhong Zhang

Although public-private partnership (PPP) is regarded as one of the key effective tools in the development of many countries, various challenges surrounding PPPs are not well understood. This paper explores nine key challenges in PPP implementation: (1) different organizational cultures and goals between the partners, (2) poor institutional environment and support, (3) weak political and legal frameworks, (4) unreliable mechanisms for sharing risk and responsibility, (5) inadequate procedures for the selection of PPP partners, (6) inconsistency between resource inputs and quality, (7) inadequate monitoring and evaluation of PPP processes, (8) lack of transparency, and (9) the inherent nature of PPPs. This paper aims to provide the perceptions in the existing literature on many of these challenges, as well as provide solutions to each challenge. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document