Semi-supervised Weighted Ternary Decision Structure for Multi-category Classification

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 1555-1582
Author(s):  
Pooja Saigal ◽  
Reshma Rastogi ◽  
Suresh Chandra
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 197-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Zenker ◽  
Sylvia von Wallpach ◽  
Erik Braun ◽  
Christine Vallaster

Author(s):  
Ayman M. Zakaria Eraqi ◽  
Walid Abdul-Hady Shoura

In Egypt, people are unable to determine the qualities of appropriate residence that achieves quality and occupant satisfaction, and contributes to sustainability of residential conglomerations. In general, developing countries lack housing information which can be used to enhance quality of residence. Also, the methods of assessing and identifying the appropriate criteria for future residence quality remain traditional ones that cannot address the multiple, conflicting, overlapping aspects to reach a good decision. This calls for using the Analytical Network Process  (ANP), an effective tool for specifying the relative importance of all factors impacting a specific issue for making an appropriate residential decision. In addition, this method provides results for the decision element impacts network within the decision structure; thus contributing to more understanding of the mechanisms and requirements of residence selection. The proposed decision structure comprises a two-level network: main clusters, main elements, and sub-elements included in the demographic characteristics group, the residence criteria group, the demand parameters group, the supply parameters group, the residence specifications group, and the alternatives group which representing, in total, the decision and specifying the percentage needed for each housing level. Results of the model showed complete capacity in smoothly addressing complexities and overlapping in the decision structure. The decision structure showed that 52% chose luxury residence, 28% chose middle-class residence, and 19.5% chose the economic residence. Mechanisms of decision making were analyzed; particularly in terms of relationship to demographic characteristics and residence specifications. Also, the importance and impact of demand / supply parameters in reaching decision were analyzed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-356
Author(s):  
Zoran Ivanović

The derivation of a decision framework from which to derive and appraise risk management strategy requires a clear statement of corporate objectives. This article follows the mainstream of financial management in assuming that a firm wishes to maximize the value of the existing owners’ equity, which means the maximization of share price. This objective is referred to, somewhat loosely, as value maximization. From the value-maximization objective, a risk management decision structure was derived. The three processes in a risk management decision relate to the identification of risk management exposures, the measurement of their impact on the firm, and the actual decision. Once risk exposures are identified, their potential for destroying share value must be measured. The decision process may be divided into those decisions concerning the use of fund, investment decisions and those concerning the source of funds, financing decisions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 848 ◽  
pp. 251-254
Author(s):  
Prin Boonkanit ◽  
Seksan Kantharos

The objective of this paper is to present an evaluation method that can aid decision to prioritize and select industrial waste management method. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) decision structure approaches to measure the relative desirability of disposal alternatives using value judgments as the input of the various stakeholders. The novel of this paper is a flexible analytical program that enables decision makers to find the best possible industrial waste management solution to complex problems by breaking down a problem into a systematic hierarchy structure among the various levels and attributes. The process of the evaluation method has been started from analyzing various factors which are used for designs the decision making structure.It is included with necessary data for consideration of management alternatives design that comprised of the technology, economics, environment, and also related regulations. The benefits of this method therefore may not only aid in selecting the best alternative but also help decision makers to understand why an alternative is preferred over the other options. A case study in Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT), recommendations, limitations, and further research are also presented.


1972 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Gearing ◽  
Turgut Var ◽  
W.W. Swart
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document