Proteomic Analysis of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Response During Compatible and Incompatible Interactions with the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum H.)

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 697-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Carrillo ◽  
D. Rubiales ◽  
M. A. Castillejo
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Proteomic Analysis ◽  
Acyrthosiphon Pisum ◽  
Pea Aphid ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Incompatible Interactions

Proteomic analysis of salicylate-induced proteins of pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaves

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 590-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Tarchevsky ◽  
V. G. Yakovleva ◽  
A. M. Egorova
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Proteomic Analysis ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Induced Proteins

SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF THE PEA APHID, ACYRTHOSIPHON PISUM (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE), IN MANITOBA FIELD PEAS

1986 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 601-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Maiteki ◽  
R.J. Lamb ◽  
S.T. Ali-Khan
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Acyrthosiphon Pisum ◽  
Pea Aphid ◽  
Seasonal Abundance ◽  
Economic Threshold ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Pea Aphids

AbstractPea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), were sampled from 1980 to 1983 in field peas, Pisum sativum (L.), in Manitoba. Sweep and foliage samples were taken in commercial fields and plots. Aphids were found in late May or early June soon after the crop emerged, but populations were low throughout June. Populations increased in July, when the crop was flowering and producing pods, and peaked in the latter half of July or early August in 3 of the 4 years, when pods were maturing. Populations decreased rapidly after the peak, as the plants senesced. In 1980, a drought year, aphid densities were low and the populations peaked in the middle of August. From 1981 to 1983, densities exceeded the economic threshold in all commercial fields and all but one of the plots that were sampled.

Distinction de biotypes dans des populations du puceron du pois, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), de l'Amérique du Nord

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 983-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques L. Auclair ◽  
P. N. Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Mexico ◽  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Host Plants ◽  
Acyrthosiphon Pisum ◽  
Broad Bean ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
The United States ◽  
Susceptible Host ◽  
Pisum Sativum L

Virginoparae of Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) collected from three different localities in the Province of Québec, Canada (Sainte-Thérèse de Blainville, Saint-Jean, and Ile aux Coudres), and two in the United States (states of Kansas and New Mexico) were reared on two normally susceptible host plants: e.g. the broad bean, Viciafaba L., variety Windsor, and the pea, Pisum sativum L., variety Lincoln. Results from growth curves suggest that the former three clones represent one or several biotypes different from the latter two, and results from mortality and rate of reproduction indicate that the clones from Saint-Jean and Sainte-Thérèse are two different biotypes. High mortality on peas indicates further that the clone from Ile aux Coudres is a biotype different from the others, whereas the clones from New Mexico and Kansas may represent only one biotype.

scholarly journals Influence of intercropping with spring cereals on the occurrence of pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, 1776) and their natural enemies in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 25-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Seidenglanz ◽  
I. Huňady ◽  
J. Poslušná ◽  
A.-K. Løes
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Entomopathogenic Fungi ◽  
Natural Enemies ◽  
Acyrthosiphon Pisum ◽  
Parasitic Wasp ◽  
Aphidius Ervi ◽  
Pisum Sativum L ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Pea Aphids ◽  
Spring Cereals

Occurrences of pea aphids and their natural enemies (syrphids, mummies caused by entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria sp. and by the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi) were compared in monocultures and mixtures of field peas and spring cereals in three seasons (2008–2010). At the beginning of colonisation, the occurrence of aphids was not substantially influenced by intercropping with cereals. However, the numbers of pea aphids located on inflorescences started to decline earlier in mixtures compared with monoculture. More syrphids (eggs + larvae) were found in mixtures than in monoculture, and more syrphid eggs were found in young aphid colonies (10 to 20 individuals) in mixtures. Intercropping did not influence the occurrence of fungal mummies (Beauveria sp.), but mixtures tended to have more aphid colonies infested by A. ervi in 2008 and 2009.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document