Comparing the scientific quality achieved by funding instruments for single grant holders and for collaborative networks within a research system: Some observations

Fragestellung: Wie lassen sich die neuen gesetzlichen Anforderungen (Statistikgesetz 1992 und Verordnungen dazu von 1993: Minimaldatensatz des Bundesamtes für Statistik [BFS] mit ICD-Codierungen sowie Krankenversicherungsgesetz 1995 mit Verordnungen dazu von 1996: Notwendigkeit der Dokumentation von Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit) mit sinnvollem Aufwand in den Klinikalltag integrieren? Methodik: Es wurde eine Synthese des BFS-Minimaldatensatzes mit zusätzlichen Informationen zur Qualitätssicherung in einem einzigen Fragenkatalog durchgeführt. Die Chirurgischen Kliniken des Spitals Limmattal in Schlieren und des Regionalspitals Biel haben 1995 die Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie (AQC) gegründet und das AQC-System 2 Jahre lang getestet. Resultate: Bis Ende 1997 wurden in der AQC-Statistik 15'115 operative Eingriffe dokumentiert. Der zeitliche Zusatzaufwand (zusätzlich zur obligatorischen BFS-Statistik, welche 3-10 Minuten in Anspruch nimmt) beläuft sich beim Ausfüllen der Fragebögen auf 1-3 Minuten. Diskussion: Zeitliche und finanzielle Aufwendungen steigen als Folge der gesetzlichen Anforderungen. Der Aufwand kann aber in praktikablen Grenzen gehalten werden, wenn ein einziger Fragebogen mehreren Zwecken gleichzeitig dient. So erfüllt das AQC-System nicht nur die gesetzlichen Anforderungen bezüglich systematischer Qualitätssicherung und BFS-Statistik sondern auch den Zweck der Klinik-Jahresstatistik, der individuellen operateurbezogenen Statistik und kann, wenn weitere Kliniken daran teilnehmen auch zum Vergleich der Kliniken untereinander herangezogen werden. Es fehlt noch an Standards, Referenzbereichen und Indikatoren. Diese können jedoch aufgrund des AQC-Systems nun leichter entwickelt werden, weil auf umfangreiches Zahlenmaterial abgestellt werden kann. Schlussfolgerungen: Das AQC-System hat sich im Alltag als praktikabel erwiesen und könnte als flächendeckendes System sowohl zur systematischen Qualitätssicherung als auch zur Abdeckung der übrigen Statistikbedürfnisse verwendet werden.

Download Full-text

The Scientific Quality of Child Custody Evaluations

PsycCRITIQUES ◽

10.1037/a0031189 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 58 (22) ◽

Author(s):

Lennart Sjöberg

Keyword(s):

Child Custody ◽

Scientific Quality ◽

Custody Evaluations ◽

Child Custody Evaluations

Download Full-text

Influential Factors of Collaborative Networks in Manufacturing: Validation of a Conceptual Model

Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management ◽

10.28945/2120 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 10 ◽

pp. 001-019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Danny Wee Hock Quik ◽

Nevan Wright ◽

Ammar Rashid ◽

Sivadass Thiruchelvam

Keyword(s):

Organizational Support ◽

Influential Factors ◽

Perceived Usefulness ◽

Manufacturing Industries ◽

Collaborative Networks ◽

Collaborative Network ◽

Perceived Effectiveness ◽

External Stakeholders ◽

Technical Systems ◽

External Learning

The purpose of the study is to identify influential factors in the use of collaborative networks within the context of manufacturing. The study aims to investigate factors that influence employees’ learning, and to bridge the gap between theory and praxis in collaborative networks in manufacturing. The study further extends the boundary of a collaborative network beyond enterprises to include suppliers, customers, and external stakeholders. It provides a holistic perspective of collaborative networks within the complexity of the manufacturing environment, based on empirical evidence from a questionnaire survey of 246 respondents from diverse manufacturing industries. Drawing upon the socio-technical systems (STS) theory, the study presents the theoretical context and interpretations through the lens of manufacturing. The results show significant influences of organizational support, promotive interactions, positive interdependence, internal-external learning, perceived effectiveness, and perceived usefulness on the use of collaborative networks among manufacturing employees. The study offers a basis of empirical validity for measuring collaborative networks in organizational learning and knowledge/information sharing in manufacturing.

Download Full-text

System of suborder Schistosomatida (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda)

Russian Journal of Parasitology ◽

10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-2-11-22 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 11-12

Author(s):

D.A. Azimov ◽

F.D. Akramova ◽

E.B. Shakarboev

Keyword(s):

Current System ◽

Research System ◽

New Variant ◽

Trichobilharzia Ocellata

The purpose of the research: system retrofit of suborder Schistosomatidа in reliance on their morfo-biological distinctions. Materials and methods. Samples of adult and 5 species of larvas have been collected and tested: Schistosoma turkestanicum Skryabin, 1913, Bilharziella polonica (Kowalewsky, 1899), Trichobilharzia ocellata (La Valette, 1854), Dendritobilharzia loossi Skryabin, 1924 and Gigantobilharzia acotylea Odhner, 1910. Adult phases of trematode have been identified in accordance to common methods. Identification of cercaria larva produced by water living shell-fish (Lymnaeidae, Planorbidae, Physidae, Melanoididae) has been carried out according to indicators. Current system of trematode suborder Schistosomatidа - vertebrate animals and man parasites are analyzed. Results and discussion. New variant of system of trematode suborder Schistosomatidа order is proposed. Schistosomatida morfo-biological distinctions and biocycles are taken as a basis. Two families are distinguished in this suborder: Schistosomatidae and Bilharziellidae, which represent parasites of warm-blooded vertebrate animals. There are two families of Sanguinicolidae and Spirorchiidae in suborder Sanguinicolida, which consist of fish and reptile parasites respectively. For Schistosomatida order the new underclass Schistosomatidea is founded. Sanguinicolida order is left as the part of Digenea underclass consisting of androgynous fluke.

Download Full-text

FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: сб.науч.тр./ OEAPS Inc.; редкол.: Флора Бертран (отв.ред.) [и др.]. - Берлин, Германия : OEAPS Inc., 2018. - 58 С.

10.31219/osf.io/hj4yf ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Мария Григорьевна Алпатова ◽

Мария Игоревна Щеглова ◽

Elmira Kalybaevna Adil’bekova ◽

Nuradin Alibaev ◽

Arunas Svitojus

Keyword(s):

Service Sector ◽

Applied Research ◽

Point Of View ◽

Scientific Quality ◽

Final Decision ◽

Main Criterion ◽

The Public ◽

Peer Reviewers ◽

Verification Process

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.

Download Full-text

FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH April 2019: сб.науч.тр./ OEAPS Inc.; редкол.: Флора Бертран (отв.ред.) [и др.]. - Берлин, Германия : OEAPS Inc., 2019. - 98 C.

10.31219/osf.io/qmrey ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Изабелла Станиславовна Чибисова ◽

Диана Ильгизаровна Шарипова ◽

Альфия Галиевна Зулькарнаева ◽

Ксения Александровна Дулова ◽

Садег Амирзадеган ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Service Sector ◽

Applied Research ◽

Point Of View ◽

Scientific Quality ◽

Final Decision ◽

Main Criterion ◽

The Public ◽

Peer Reviewers ◽

Verification Process

The conference is a major international forum for analyzing and discussing trends and approaches in research in the field of basic science and applied research. We provide a platform for discussions on innovative, theoretical and empirical research. The form of the conference: in absentia, without specifying the form in the collection of articles. Working languages: Russian, English Doctors and candidates of science, scientists, specialists of various profiles and directions, applicants for academic degrees, teachers, graduate students, undergraduates, students are invited to participate in the conference. There is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final. The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important. Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.

Download Full-text

Academy Journal No.3(15), 2019/ Chief Editors Susan Belih & Jaak Järv /OEAPS Inc.(Open European Academy of Public Sciences) & Estonian Academy of Sciences. Tallinn, Estonia. 09.03.2019: OEAPS Inc., 2019. - 88 P. ISBN: 9781797440507 ISSN 1736-7530 (electronic)

10.31219/osf.io/u5yxe ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Inc. OEAPS

Keyword(s):

Service Sector ◽

Point Of View ◽

Scientific Quality ◽

Final Decision ◽

Research Subjects ◽

Wide Range ◽

Peer Reviewers ◽

Verification Process ◽

Scientific Research Articles ◽

Monthly Journal

"Academy Journal" is an international, peer-reviewed monthly journal. It is devoted to the publication of original scientific research articles dealing with various academic disciplines.Articles that may be of interest to a wide range of researchers are welcome, and not limited to those who work on specific research subjects."Academy Journal" has an open archive, according to which published articles are available immediately after publication, excluding embargoes.Expert reviewThere is one blind verification process in the journal. All articles will be initially evaluated by the editor for compliance with the journal. Manuscripts that are considered appropriate are then usually sent to at least two independent peer reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the article. The editor is responsible for the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. The editor's decision is final.The main criterion used in assessing the manuscript submitted to the journal is: uniqueness or innovation in the work from the point of view of the methodology being developed and / or its application to a problem of particular importance in the public sector or service sector and / or the setting in which the efforts, for example, in the developing region of the world. That is, the very model / methodology, application and context of problems, at least one of them must be unique and important.Additional criteria considered in the consideration of the submitted document are its accuracy, organization / presentation (ie logical flow) and recording quality.

Download Full-text