A systematic review on the impact of cement industries on the natural environment

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh Chandra Mishra ◽  
Surendra Sarsaiya ◽  
Amita Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
The Impact

Author response for "The impact of joint media engagement on parent–child interactions: A systematic review"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie A. Ewin ◽  
Andrea E. Reupert ◽  
Louise A. McLean ◽  
Christopher J. Ewin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Author Response ◽  
Joint Media Engagement ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Parent Child

The impact of adult weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Jones ◽  
Emma Lawlor ◽  
Simon Griffin ◽  
Sluijs Esther van ◽  
Amy Ahern
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Weight ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
The Impact

The impact of daycare programs on child health, nutrition and development in developing countries: a systematic review

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jef L Leroy ◽  
◽  
Paola Gadsden ◽  
Maite Guijarro ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Child Health ◽  
The Impact

Systematic review methodology for development: An example from microfinance

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Van Rooyen ◽  
Ruth Stewart ◽  
Thea De Wet
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
International Development ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Systematic Review Methodology ◽  
Development Interventions ◽  
The Us ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Evidence Based Decision Making

Big international development donors such as the UK’s Department for International Development and USAID have recently started using systematic review as a methodology to assess the effectiveness of various development interventions to help them decide what is the ‘best’ intervention to spend money on. Such an approach to evidence-based decision-making has long been practiced in the health sector in the US, UK, and elsewhere but it is relatively new in the development field. In this article we use the case of a systematic review of the impact of microfinance on the poor in sub-Saharan African to indicate how systematic review as a methodology can be used to assess the impact of specific development interventions.

THE IMPACT OF LUMBOPELVIC CONTROL ON OVERHEAD PERFORMANCE AND SHOULDER INJURY IN OVERHEAD ATHLETES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thane Cope ◽  
Sarah Wechter ◽  
Michaella Stucky ◽  
Corey Thomas ◽  
Mark Wilhelm
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Injury ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
The Impact

Stress, anxiety, depression and burnout in frontline health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a brief systematic review and new data from Russia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Mosolova ◽  
Dmitry Sosin ◽  
Sergey Mosolov
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
The Impact

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) have been subject to increased workload while also exposed to many psychosocial stressors. In a systematic review we analyze the impact that the pandemic has had on HCWs mental state and associated risk factors. Most studies reported high levels of depression and anxiety among HCWs worldwide, however, due to a wide range of assessment tools, cut-off scores, and number of frontline participants in the studies, results were difficult to compare. Our study is based on two online surveys of 2195 HCWs from different regions of Russia during spring and autumn epidemic outbreaks revealed the rates of anxiety, stress, depression, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and perceived stress as 32.3%, 31.1%, 45.5%, 74.2%, 37.7% ,67.8%, respectively. Moreover, 2.4% of HCWs reported suicidal thoughts. The most common risk factors include: female gender, nurse as an occupation, younger age, working for over 6 months, chronic diseases, smoking, high working demands, lack of personal protective equipment, low salary, lack of social support, isolation from families, the fear of relatives getting infected. These results demonstrate the need for urgent supportive programs for HCWs fighting COVID-19 that fall into higher risk factors groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document