scholarly journals Gender Differences in Health Care Utilization Among Veterans with Chronic Pain

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneet Kaur ◽  
Karen M. Stechuchak ◽  
Cynthia J. Coffman ◽  
Kelli D. Allen ◽  
Lori A. Bastian
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-51
Author(s):  
T. Jonsdottir ◽  
H. Jonsdottir ◽  
S. Gunnarsdottir

AbstractAimsTo investigate predictors for health-care utilization for chronic pain and whether there are gender differences in variables predicting chronic pain-related health care utilization.MethodsA postal questionnaire measuring socio-demographic variables, pain characteristics, health related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain related health care utilization, was sent to a sample of 4500 individuals randomly drawn from the national population of Iceland. The relationships between socio-demographic and pain related variables and pain related health care utilization among participants reporting chronic pain (≥3 months) were tested by using bivariate and multivariate statistical analysis.ResultsThe prevalence of chronic pain among respondents was 47.5%. Among participants reporting chronic pain, 53.2% had consulted a health care provider for pain during the previous six months.Predictors for pain related health care utilization were pain interference with daily life and pain pattern (daily pain) as well as physical components of HRQoL. Even though health care utilization was not related to gender, there were gender differences in pain-related predictors for health care utilization. Interference with daily life and pain pattern were the strongest predictors among women, but interference with life and the physical components of HRQoL were the strongest predictors for men. Pain related health care utilization was not related to socio-demographic variables.ConclusionsPain related variables are better predictors of chronic pain related health care utilization than socio-demographics. Even though gender does not predict chronic pain-related health care utilization, there are gender differences in the relationships between pain-related variables and health care utilization. These gender differences warrant further exploration.


Pain ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather E. Foley ◽  
John C. Knight ◽  
Michelle Ploughman ◽  
Shabnam Asghari ◽  
Richard Audas

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean A Tripp ◽  
Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof ◽  
Margo McAlister

BACKGROUND: Canadian chronic pain prevalence estimates range from 11% to 66%, are affected by sampling and measurement bias, and largely represent urban settings.OBJECTIVES: To estimate chronic pain prevalence and factors associated with pain in southeastern Ontario, a region with a larger rural than urban residence.METHODS: A systematic sampling with a random start was used to contact households. A telephone-administered questionnaire using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale, with questions on health care and medication use, health status, depression and demographics, was administered to consenting adults (18 to 94 years of age; mean age 50.2±16.6 years).RESULTS: The response rate was 49% (1067 of 2167), with 76% reporting some pain over the past six months. Low pain intensity with low pain interference prevalence was 34% (grade I), high pain intensity with low pain interference was 26% (grade II), and high pain intensity with high pain interference was 17% (grades III and IV). Of those reporting pain, 49% reported chronic pain (ie, pain for a minimum of 90 days over the past six months) representing 37% of the sample. Being female, unmarried, lower income, poorer self-reported health status and rural residence were associated with increasing pain. Once depression was considered in this pain analysis, residence was no longer significant. Lower rates of health care utilization were reported by rural residents. In those reporting the highest pain grades, poor health, greater medication and health care use, depression and more pain sites were associated with higher odds for pain-related disability.CONCLUSION: There is an elevated prevalence of pain in this almost equally split rural/urban region. Further examination of health care utilization and depression is suggested in chronic pain prevalence research.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald D. McGeary ◽  
Todd Seech ◽  
Alan L. Peterson ◽  
Cindy A. McGeary ◽  
Robert J. Gatchel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gordana Gajovic ◽  
Katarina Janicijevic ◽  
Dragana Andric ◽  
Olivera Djurovic ◽  
Svetlana Radevic

Abstract The unstoppable process of demographic aging of population has profound consequences on the economic, health, social and political spheres of society, because of the specific and diverse needs of the older population. The aim of the study was to examine gender differences of health care utilization among elderly in Serbia. The survey was conducted as a part of the national study “Health Survey of the Serbian population” in 2013. In the past year, 87.4% of the older population visited their chosen doctor. Women were significantly more likely to use primary health care compared to men, while the frequency of hospitalization is significantly higher in men. When it comes to female population, age, region of residence and financial situation stood out as the most important predictors of primary care services usage. In men, the residence stood out as the most important predictor of primary health care services usage. Multivariate binary logistic regression distinguishes gender, education and region of residence as the most important factors associated with hospital treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document