Rehabilitation and quality-of-life issues in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 477-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet A. Parsons ◽  
Aileen M. Davis
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekka Götzl ◽  
Sebastian Sterzinger ◽  
Sabine Semrau ◽  
Nikolaos Vassos ◽  
Werner Hohenberger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives The purpose of this study is to analyze major complication rates and different aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with or without radio (chemo) therapy and surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent Extremity STS excision from 2004 to 2014 (182 patients included). Patients’ data were collected from patients’ records. HRQoL was assessed by using EORTC QLQ-C30. Results A total of 182 patients underwent sarcoma resection. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT), the major-complication rate amounted to 28% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p <  0.001). Major-complication rates after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) occurred in 8% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p = 0.265). Comparison QoL scores between treating with neoadjuvant RCT or without RT revealed significant worse scores with neoadjuvant RCT. Further stratification of disease control of these patients showed significant reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT compared to irradiated disease-free patients. Discussion To date, there have only been a few investigations of QoL in STS. Retrospective study on quality of life have limitations, like a lack of baseline evaluation of QoL. Patient candidated to radiation therapy could have had worse QoL baseline due to more advanced disease. Disease status of the patients who answered the questionnaires could have been an influence of QoL and we could show reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT, but not for the patients with recurrence or metastasis, so it is very hard to discriminate whether radiation therapy could really have an impact or not. Conclusion This study might assist in further improving the understanding of QoL in STS patients and may animate for prospective studies examining the oncological therapies impact on HRQoL.


2011 ◽  
Vol 123 (15-16) ◽  
pp. 488-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Peiper ◽  
Hanno Matthaei ◽  
Edwin Bölke ◽  
David Zurakowski ◽  
Klaus Orth ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1439-1446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphne Schreiber ◽  
Robert S. Bell ◽  
Jay S. Wunder ◽  
Brian O’Sullivan ◽  
Robert Turcotte ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 114 (7) ◽  
pp. 821-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darin Davidson ◽  
Ronald D. Barr ◽  
Soha Riad ◽  
Anthony M. Griffin ◽  
Peter W. Chung ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja M. J. Thijssens ◽  
Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers ◽  
Robert J. van Ginkel ◽  
Harald J. Hoekstra

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e035546
Author(s):  
Leopold Hentschel ◽  
Stephan Richter ◽  
Hans-Georg Kopp ◽  
Bernd Kasper ◽  
Annegret Kunitz ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe choice of drug treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) continues to be a challenge regarding efficacy, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. Unlike other cancer types, where integrating patient-reported outcomes (PRO) has proven to be beneficial for QoL, there is no such evidence in patients with STS as of now. The YonLife trial aimed to explore the effect of a tailored multistep intervention on QoL, symptoms and survival in patients with advanced STS undergoing treatment with trabectedin as well as identifying predictors of QoL.DesignYonLife is a cluster-randomised, open-label, proof-of-concept study. The intervention incorporates electronic PRO assessment, a case vignette and expert-consented treatment recommendations.ParticipantsSix hospitals were randomised to the control arm (CA) or interventional arm (IA). Seventy-nine patients were included of whom 40 were analysed as per-protocol analysis set.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary end point was the change of Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) total score after 9 weeks. Secondary outcomes included QoL (FACT-G subscales), anorexia and cachexia (Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT)), symptoms (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)), anxiety and depression (HADS), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)) and survival assessment.ResultsAfter 9 weeks of treatment, QoL declined less in the IA (ΔFACT-G total score: −2.4, 95% CI: −9.2 to 4.5) as compared with CA (ΔFACT-G total score: −3.9; 95% CI:−11.3 to 3.5; p=0.765). In almost all FACT-G subscales, average declines were lower in IA, but without reaching statistical significance. Smaller adverse trends between arms were observed for MDASI, FAACT, HADS and BPI scales. These trends failed to reach statistical significance. Overall mean survival was longer in IA (648 days) than in CA (389 days, p=0.110). QoL was predicted by symptom severity, symptom interference, depression and anxiety.ConclusionOur data suggest a potentially favourable effect of an electronic patient-reported outcomes based intervention on QoL that needs to be reappraised in confirmatory studies.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT02204111).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document