Implementing Community Engagement for Combination Prevention: Lessons Learnt From the First Year of the HPTN 071 (PopART) Community-Randomized Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musonda Simwinga ◽  
◽  
Virginia Bond ◽  
Nozizwe Makola ◽  
Graeme Hoddinott ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Sage J. Kim ◽  
Jesus Ramirez-Valles ◽  
Karriem Watson ◽  
Paula Allen-Mears ◽  
Alicia Matthews ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction:The purpose of this article is to describe the process of developing and implementing a transdisciplinary community-based research center, the Center for Health Equity Research (CHER) Chicago, to offer a model for designing and implementing research centers that aim to address structural causes of health inequality.Methods:Scholars from diverse backgrounds and disciplines formed a multidisciplinary team for the Center and adopted the structural violence framework as the organizing conceptual model. All Center activities were based on community partnership. The Center activities were organized within three cores: administrative, investigator development, and community engagement and dissemination cores. The key activities during the first year were to develop a pilot grant program for early-stage investigators (ESIs) and to establish community partnership mechanisms.Results:CHER provided more than 60 consultations for ESIs, which resulted in 31 pilot applications over the three application cycles. Over 200 academic and community partners attended the community symposium and discussed community priority. Some challenges encountered were to improve communication among investigators, to clarify roles and responsibilities of the three cores, and to build consensus on the definition and operationalization of the concept of structural violence.Conclusion:There is an increasing need for local hubs to facilitate transdisciplinary collaboration and community engagement to effectively address health inequity. Building consensus around a shared vision among partners is a difficult and yet important step toward achieving equity.


Author(s):  
R. J. Lane ◽  
J. Behenna

This paper describes the concept and design of the EJ200 engine to meet the air staff targets for the European Fighter Aircraft. The international collaborative arrangements to support the programme are shown and the lessons learnt from previous collaboration illustrated. The excellent progress made in the programme during the first year since the signing of the development contract is described to illustrate confidence in the ability to meet the design targets within the programme timescales.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phaik Yeong Cheah ◽  
Khin Maung Lwin ◽  
Lucy Phaiphun ◽  
Ladda Maelankiri ◽  
Michael Parker ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 79 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1210-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Määttänen ◽  
A Auvinen ◽  
U-H Stenman ◽  
S Rannikko ◽  
T Tammela ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amy Clark ◽  
Becks Hill ◽  
Ron Bannerman ◽  
Leah Wohlgemuth ◽  
Jennifer Burrill ◽  
...  

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic hit at a time when the Ascend West and Central Africa programme was nearing the end of its first year of a 3-y programme. This article reflects on key lessons learnt from the rapid adaptation of an integrated neglected tropical disease (NTD) programme to support COVID-19 responses in 11 countries. It shares the experiences of adopting a flexible and directive approach, leveraging the NTD network and relationships, and working in collaboration with multiple ministry departments, commercial sector partners and the UK Foreign Commonwealth Development Office to repurpose over £6 million of budget.


SICOT-J ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Marco C. Sarmento ◽  
António E. Cartucho ◽  
Jacinto M. Monteiro

Background: Due to the rotator cuff retear after being surgically repaired, some strategies have been developed. The authors verified that the possibility of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) vented anchors promoted a better clinical and healing process than PEEK solid anchors. Methods: A prospective and randomized study was designed with 38 patients treated with PEEK anchors, 18 of whom with vented anchors and 20 with solid ones. Demographic, clinical and radiologic data were collected before and during surgery (time 0) and at 12 months of follow-up. Results: In the final follow-up (12 months), there was no difference in the visual analogic scale (VAS) scale between groups (1.7 points vs 1.9 points; p = 0.731), neither in the DASH score (34.2 points vs 23.9 points; p = 0.268), nor in absolute Constant score (76.9 points vs 77.3 points; p = 0.910). In MRI, 10 patients had their cuff tear healed in the vented group and 15 in the solid group (p = 0.173). Conclusion: The new designed vented anchors do not add any advantage when compared to solids ones, at least within the first year after surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document