scholarly journals Dengue epidemiology and pathogenesis: images of the future viewed through a mirror of the past

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashedul Islam ◽  
Mohammed Salahuddin ◽  
Md. Salahuddin Ayubi ◽  
Tahmina Hossain ◽  
Apurba Majumder ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Erik KARLSEN

AbstractThis article proposes a functional historicist explanation to explicate the core ideas and underlying logic embedded in the futures literacy concept.Futures literacy assumes a capacity to reflect on the past, sense and make sense of the present and use this reflective body of knowledge when anticipating the future.Arguably, futures literacy must be learned, sustained, and regained; it requires a continuous, anticipative, and recursive loop. Recursivity, where an effect in an initial period acts as a cause in the next period, retroacts between the future and present, regaining anticipation. Anticipation has causal effects in the way it structures our images of the future and the avenue we follow when striving to achieve this image. Such a causal structure implies both feedforward and feedback control and is contained in the logic of functional explanations used in sociology.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 311-321
Author(s):  
Inga V. Zheltikova

The concept of future is an integral part of the present of any culture. The focus of this article is how strongly the expectation of the future is associated with innovations, what is the meaning of the conservative features present in the images of future, which conservative elements are thought to be part of the images of future. The author analyzes the images of the future of Russia on the basis of such material as fictional prose, postcards and films of the last two centuries, and identifies several parameters of life, which are transferred into the future from the present and even from the past.


2018 ◽  
Vol 169 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-193
Author(s):  
Roderich von Detten

Forestry or the strategy of muddling-through (essay) The claim of foresters to steer and manage forests in the long term (“sustainability strategy”) is in striking contrast to the indication that our forests present themselves, in effect, as a multiform conglomerate of planned and unforeseen, expected and accidental features. If one accepts the fact that the future is generally unknown and our images of the future are mere fiction, stemming from experiences and knowledge from the past, a comparative view on forest sciences and practice shows how differently both realms deal with uncertainty regarding the future. In the sciences, working with future models has become an established approach: based upon various suppositions and simplifications, they first and foremost inform about established, basic assumptions and expectations instead of leading to reliable prognoses. In contrast, long-term decision making in practical forest management is informed by the experience that the future will prove “different” and unexpected. Hence, the principle of sustainability cannot be based on a long-term strategy, but is characterized by a permanent process of intelligent muddling-through.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document