scholarly journals Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome Between Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Rural Indian Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (S3) ◽  
pp. 877-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firoz R. Borle ◽  
Bhupendra Mehra ◽  
Akash ranjan Singh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Indian Population ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF COSMETIC OUTCOME BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY & SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Ashok Kaundal ◽  
Suneet Katoch
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Aim: Comparative analysis of cosmetic outcome between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Method:  Patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithasis were randomly subjected to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional four ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (cLC). Data analyzed included cosmetic outcome, Results: The body image score for SILC group ranged from 30 to 44 with mean score of 40.76 ± 2.773 while that for cLC group ranged from 33 to 42 with mean score of 38.28 ± 1.969. p-value for the comparison stands 0.001 which shows that patients undergoing SILC had better cosmetic perception of their body image compared to cLC group Conclusion: SILC is better cosmetic perception as compare to cLC Keywords: SILC, cLC, Cosmetic outcome

Comparison of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy versus Needlescopic Cholecystectomy: A Single Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Umemura ◽  
Takayuki Suto ◽  
Seika Nakamura ◽  
Hisataka Fujiwara ◽  
Fumitaka Endo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Needlescopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Incisional Pain

Background: Both single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and needlescopic cholecystectomy (NSC) are superior to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of cosmetic outcome and incisional pain. We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical outcome, postoperative pain, and cosmetic outcome for SILC and NSC procedures. Methods: In this trial, 105 patients were enrolled (52 in the SILC group; 53 in the NSC group). A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the cosmetic outcome and incisional pain for patients. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the operative difficulty that was present for both procedures. Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or surgical outcomes, including operative time and blood loss. The mean VAS scores for cosmetic satisfaction were similar in both groups. There were significant differences in the mean VAS scores for incisional pain on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.009), and analgesics were required within 12 h of surgery (p = 0.007). Obesity (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) was the only significant influential factor for operating time over 100 min (p = 0.031). Conclusion: NSC is superior to SILC in terms of short-term incisional pain. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons can perform both SILC and NSC without an increase in operative time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document