Comparison of Postoperative Pain Between Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Siu-Wang Wong ◽  
Yue-Sun Cheung ◽  
Kwong-Wai Fong ◽  
Charing Ching-Ning Chong ◽  
Kit-Fai Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

scholarly journals Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments in situs inversus totalis

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e226404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajinder Singh Jhobta ◽  
Archit Gupta ◽  
Balwant Negi ◽  
Kapil Negi
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Young Woman ◽  
Situs Inversus ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Situs Inversus Totalis ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Situs inversus totalis is a rare genetic disorder. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in situs inversus totalis has been reported rarely. SILC has an advantage of being easier than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in addition to better cosmesis and reduced postoperative pain. We report a case of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy done in a young woman with situs inversus totalis using conventional laparoscopic instruments.

scholarly journals Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Conventional Cholecystectomy in Developing Country

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (179) ◽  
Author(s):  
P B Thapa ◽  
DK Maharjan ◽  
DR Singh
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Single Incision Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION: Use of laparoscopic surgery has demanded principles of less trauma of access hence less scar and so probably less complications. Hence conventional laparoscopic surgeries were tried with natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) and then single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). With refinement in instruments and surgeons skills SILS have bridged up between conventional and NOTES in order to quench the desire of less or no scar at all. METHODS: Comparative case control study between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and SILS in public teaching hospital. RESULTS: Total 20 patients underwent SILS cholecystectomy and 20 underwent conventional cholecystectomy and found that no difference between both in terms of post operative pain score, hospital stay and post operative wound infection except significant difference in mean operative time and patient's level of satisfaction was less in patient with SILC if were subjected to pay for instruments in order to maintain cosmesis. CONCLUSIONS: Though SILS have gained rapid acceptance in surgical fraternity, large number of randomized controlled trials are necessary to show its benefit over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Keywords: cholecystectomy, conventional, laparoscopy, single incision, surgery

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document