Observational Study Investigating the Prescription of Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and/or Secondary Prevention in Residents Aged 80 Years and Over Institutionalized in Nursing Homes in Brest

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1043-1047
Author(s):  
C. Pichot ◽  
A. Gentric
2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Degli Esposti ◽  
Mirko Di Martino ◽  
Stefania Saragoni ◽  
Alessandro Capone ◽  
Pierluigi Russo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-291
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sohaib Asghar ◽  
◽  
Muhammad Nadeem Ahsan ◽  
Zara Saeed ◽  
Faran Khalid ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Weingaertner ◽  
L Beier ◽  
K Stein

Abstract Background Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypercholesterolemia patients at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk is essential in preventing future CV events. However, LDL-C targets often remain unattained. Purpose The purpose of the present survey was to identify possible reasons for insufficient LDL-C target achievement despite the availability of efficacious lipid lowering drugs in the clinical setting of hypercholesterolemia management in secondary prevention patients in Germany. Methods PROCYON was an online survey with over 5,000 participants on disease perception, awareness, burden, and management of hypercholesterolemia consisting of a patient survey (PROCYON A) and a healthcare practitioner (HCP) survey (PROCYON B). To quantify patient self-activation, the PAM-13 Patient Activation Measure by Insignia Health was incorporated. Results on 1,696 patients in secondary prevention are presented. Results Most post-CV event patients do not achieve their LDL-C target. HCPs assume patients' poor adherence to medication and lifestyle adaptions to be the most important reason (Figure 1). However, this contradicts the patients' perception. Accordingly, 87% of the patients are on a lipid lowering therapy and 81% of them have stated to take their medication regularly. They rank their medication for LDL-C reduction as equally important as that for other diseases. In contrast, HCPs think that 46% of their patients do not take hypercholesterolemia seriously. However, HCPs also believe, that LDL target attainment is still “important” or “very important” to 81% of their patients. This is in line with the patients' perception: 84% of the patients consider reaching their target as “important” or “very important”. PAM-13 results underline these results: 60% of the patients are already activated and want to gain control over their disease (PAM-13 level 3 of 4) and 12% reach highest self-activation levels (level 4 of 4). The HCP remains the major source of information for 77% of the patients and only 42% reach out for online resources. The importance of educating patients on adherence is acknowledged by all HCPs. Therefore, 71% express their desire of educational material. With respect to LDL-C levels, 49% of the patients reported no improvement. Of the patients under treatment without LDL-C improvement, only 23% take more than one drug, and 47% reported a change of dose. Furthermore, collaboration between GPs and specialists (cardiologists, diabetologists, lipidologists) was not evident. Conclusion Although secondary prevention patients are motivated to pursue their LDL-C targets, HCPs consider patient adherence as major reason for failure. Instead, the survey indicated that therapeutic strategies are not fully exhausted and there is space for treatment improvement either by dose escalation or addition of further lipid lowering drugs. Furthermore, patient education and specialist collaboration could improve patient management. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Pharma GmbH Figure 1


2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Emina Aleksic ◽  
Radmila Stamenkovic ◽  
Mirjana Lapcevic ◽  
Marina Deljanin-Ilic ◽  
Dragan Djordjevic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Considering that dyslipidaemia is an important factor for cardiovascular diseases, target lipid levels are rarely reached in everyday clinical practice. Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate how often we achieve the treatment goals for the lipid parameters in the diabetic and non-diabetic patients after the previous myocardial infarction (MI). Methods. The survey included 118 patients (84 males and 34 females), mean age 59.38?9.86 years, 34 (28.8%) of them diabetics, with the history of MI in the previous 3 years. The patients were selected from the database of multicentre prospective interventional study ?Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular diseases?, conducted in 2005 on 1,189 patients in Serbia. The patients were further followed in the period from 18 (5th visit) and 36 months (6th visit) after inclusion into the study from 2005-2008. Their lipid status, the use of lipid-lowering drugs, and the independent prognostic factors for major adverse coronary events were identified. In the beginning of the study, all patients were informed about the importance of lifestyle change and active approach to treatment. The accomplishment of secondary preventive measures was estimated on the basis of the European guidelines on secondary prevention of the coronary heart disease. Results. Three years after introduction of the preventive measures, diabetics had a higher prevalence of the target levels of the total cholesterol (21.2% vs. 7.6%) and HDL-cholesterol than non-diabetics (100% vs. 87.3%) (p<0.05). Non-diabetics had significantly higher prevalence of the target levels of LDL-cholesterol than diabetics (19% vs. 3%) (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in the prevalence of the treatment goals of triglycerides in diabetic (42.4%) and non-diabetic patients (60.8%) (p>0.05). At the end of the study, after applying secondary prevention measures, 27.3% of diabetics did not use lipid-lowering drugs. The percentage of non-diabetics using no lipid-lowering drugs was lower (20.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). By using the method Enter Cox regression multivariant analysis, the change in the level of triglycerides, total and LDL-cholesterol were singled out as independent prognostic factors for major adverse coronary events. Conclusion. Our study has shown high prevalence of increased plasma concentrations in the total, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides and low plasma concentrations of HDL-cholesterol, as well as the insufficient use of lipid-lowering drugs in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with previous MI. Decreasing the total cholesterol and increasing the HDL-cholesterol are significant, decreasing of triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol does not suffice. Therefore, secondary prevention measures of cardiovascular events should be intensified, especially in patients with diabetes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document