A reinforcement method of floor grouting in high-water pressure working face of coal mines: a case study in Luxi coal mine, North China

2022 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minglei Zhai ◽  
Haibo Bai ◽  
Luyuan Wu ◽  
Guangming Wu ◽  
Xianzhen Yan ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-596
Author(s):  
Han Han ◽  
Pengfei Wang ◽  
Ronghua Liu ◽  
Chang Tian

Abstract Pressure nozzle is commonly used in the dust-reduction techniques by spraying of underground coal mines. Based on the internal structure, the pressure nozzle can be divided into the following types: spiral channel nozzle, tangential flow-guided nozzle and X-swirl nozzle. In order to provide better guidance on the selection of nozzles for the coal mine dust-reduction systems by spraying, we designed comparing experiments to study the atomization characteristics and dust-reduction performance of four commonly used nozzles in the coal mine underground with different internal structures. From the experimental results on the atomization characteristics, both the tangential flow-guided nozzle and the X-swirl nozzle have high flow coefficients. The atomization angle is the largest in the spiral non-porous nozzle, and smallest in both the X-swirl nozzle and the spiral porous nozzle. The spraying range and the droplet velocity are inversely proportional to the atomization angle. When the water pressure is low, the atomization performance of the spiral non-porous nozzle is the best among the four types of nozzles. The atomization performance of the X-swirl nozzle is superior to other types when the water pressure is high. Under the high water pressure, the particle size of the atomized droplets is smallest in the X-swirl nozzle. Through the experiments on the dust-reduction performance of the four types of nozzles and the comprehensive analysis, the X-swirl nozzle is recommended for the coal mine application site with low water pressure in the dust-reduction system, while at the sites with high water pressure, the spiral non-porous nozzle is recommended, which has the lowest water consumption and obvious economic advantages.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (43) ◽  
pp. 1536-1539
Author(s):  
Chang-soo. Kim ◽  
Jae-yoon. Kim ◽  
Soo-ho. Lee ◽  
Hyun. Cho ◽  
Dong-ahn. Hwang

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 2149-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aénor Pons ◽  
Emilie Béchade ◽  
Jenny Jouin ◽  
Maggy Colas ◽  
Pierre-Marie Geffroy ◽  
...  

Processes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weimin Yang ◽  
Zhongdong Fang ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Liping Li ◽  
Shaoshuai Shi ◽  
...  

In order to explore the catastrophic evolution process for karst cave water inrush in large buried depth and high water pressure tunnels, a model test system was developed, and a similar fluid–solid coupled material was found. A model of the catastrophic evolution of water inrush was developed based on the Xiema Tunnel, and the experimental section was simulated using the finite element method. By analyzing the interaction between groundwater and the surrounding rocks during tunnel excavation, the law of occurrence of water inrush disaster was summarized. The water inrush process of a karst cave containing high-pressure water was divided into three stages: the production of a water flowing fracture, the expansion of the water flowing fracture, and the connection of the water flowing fracture. The main cause of water inrush in karst caves is the penetration and weakening of high-pressure water on the surrounding rock. This effect is becoming more and more obvious as tunnel excavation progresses. The numerical simulation results showed that the outburst prevention thickness of the surrounding rock is 4.5 m, and that of the model test result is 5 m. Thus, the results of the two methods are relatively close to each other. This work is important for studying the impact of groundwater on underground engineering, and it is of great significance to avoid water inrush in tunnels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document