Searching for Indicator Species of High Floristic Quality Depressional Wetlands in the US Southern Plains

Wetlands ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason T. Bried ◽  
Tommi S. Fouts ◽  
Suneeti K. Jog
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommi S. Fouts ◽  
Suneeti K. Jog ◽  
Jason T. Bried

Abstract Floristic Quality Assessment requires compiling a full list of vascular plant species for the wetland. Practitioners may lack the time and taxonomic skills for full-community vegetation surveys, especially when wetlands are large and complex. In this paper we broadly ask whether floristic quality indicator species may exist for wetlands, specifically evaluating indicator species potential for high floristic quality wetlands in the US southern plains region. Indicators were identified for a broader context (wetlands in Oklahoma prairie ecoregions) and narrower context (depressional wetlands in the northern Central Great Plains ecoregion of Oklahoma) based on indicator value, indicator validity, hydrophytic status, and ecological conservatism. No candidate indicators satisfied all criteria for high floristic quality. Indicator values improved with increasing spatial-environmental context, but many candidates occurred too frequently in non-high quality sites or too infrequently in high quality sites, relative to predicted rates. The best performing indicator (Eleocharis compressa) lacked validity in the broader context and showed high false-positive rates in the narrower context. Combining E. compressa with select other candidates (Amorpha fruticosa, Juncus torreyi, Leersia oryzoides, Schoenoplectus pungens) may compensate for weaknesses but the combinations may rarely be found across the region. Overall, these results do not support relying on indicator species to rapidly identify or verify high floristic quality wetlands in the US southern plains. We recommend similar studies in other regions and testing other quality levels (low, moderate) before broadly concluding that floristic quality indicator species do not exist for wetlands.


2020 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-311
Author(s):  
Colleen Friday ◽  
John Derek Scasta

Background and aims – Native American reservations in the United States provide biodiversity critical for conservation and ecosystem functions. Unfortunately, botanical inventories are less common for reservations than other land jurisdictions. Such ecological importance and needs are apparent for the Wind River Indian Reservation (WRIR), the 7th largest reservation in the US (>890,000 ha) that is shared by the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho.Material and methods – A botanical study for two WRIR high-elevation basins (Saint Lawrence Basin (SLB) and Paradise Basin (PB)) to (1) reconcile a 1960 plant list, and (2) quantify plant communities ecologically was conducted. In 2017, 106 monitoring sites were established to quantify species presence. Across basins, 231 total vascular plant taxa (221 to species and 10 to genus) were identified, or > 3× more plant species than noted in the 1960 list. In SLB, 222 plant taxa (213 to species and 9 to genus) were identified and in PB 98 plant taxa (90 to species and 8 to genus) were identified. In 2018, sites were re-sampled to quantify species abundance, soil pH, organic matter, soil nutrients, CEC, salts, and texture. Key results – Slope and elevation explained species distributions in the topography ordination and soil organic matter, pH, texture, P, and K explained species distributions in the soil ordination. Eleven exotic species, and one rare endemic species were documented with implications for empowering tribal management. Using a classification approach followed by an indicator species analysis and fidelity (Phi) assessment, we identified 14 unique plant communities and related these to 6 alliances and 7 associations across 6 macrogroups from the US National Vegetation Classification database. These indicator species of communities included sedges (Carex aquatilus), grasses (Pseudoroegneria spicata, Elymus elymoides, Achnatherum lettermanii, Elymus trachycaulus subsp. trachycaulus, Poa glauca subsp. rupicola), forbs (Polygonum bistortoides, Balsamorhiza incana, Castilleja flava), shrubs (Artemisia tridentata, Betula glandulosa, Dasiphora fruticosa subsp. floribunda) and trees (Pinus contorta).Conclusion – The plant taxa, plant communities, and ecological drivers documented in this study will enhance tribal and federal monitoring of these high-elevation WRIR basins.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Rhett Jackson ◽  
Caleb Sytsma ◽  
Lori A. Sutter ◽  
Darold P. Batzer

Abstract Defining the upslope extent of Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction over wetlands and streams has been contentious since the passage of the Act but has large effects on the type, number, and area of wetlands that are protected by legislation. Federal guidance in the US has changed and evolved in response to scientific knowledge, Supreme Court decisions, and policy goals of Presidential Administrations. In 2020, the Trump administration replaced the Obama administration Clean Water Rule with the Navigable Waters Protection Rule with the goal of reducing jurisdiction over so-called isolated depressional wetlands and small streams. Here we use a case study of a titanium sands mining proposal on Trail Ridge southeast of Okefenokee Swamp to illustrate the large reduction in wetland and stream protection engendered by this policy change. Under the Navigable Waters Protection Rule, all seven wetlands within the 232 ha mining area, totaling 131 ha or 56% of the project area, were deemed non-jurisdictional and thus the project required no federal review or permitting. Under an earlier mining application under the Clean Water Rule, all of these wetlands were declared jurisdictional. Trail Ridge is located on the Atlantic Coastal Plain, an ecological province rich in depressional wetlands and ill-defined surface drainages. This case study shows that in such environments, the Navigable Water Protection Rule will allow destruction of large numbers and areas of ecologically significant wetlands.


1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abelardo Rodríguez ◽  
James N. Trapp ◽  
Odell L. Walker ◽  
Daniel J. Bernardo

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-184
Author(s):  
Amy Garrigues

On September 15, 2003, the US. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that agreements between pharmaceutical and generic companies not to compete are not per se unlawful if these agreements do not expand the existing exclusionary right of a patent. The Valley DrugCo.v.Geneva Pharmaceuticals decision emphasizes that the nature of a patent gives the patent holder exclusive rights, and if an agreement merely confirms that exclusivity, then it is not per se unlawful. With this holding, the appeals court reversed the decision of the trial court, which held that agreements under which competitors are paid to stay out of the market are per se violations of the antitrust laws. An examination of the Valley Drugtrial and appeals court decisions sheds light on the two sides of an emerging legal debate concerning the validity of pay-not-to-compete agreements, and more broadly, on the appropriate balance between the seemingly competing interests of patent and antitrust laws.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document