scholarly journals A Study on the Knowledge, Perception, and Use of Breast Cancer Screening Methods and Quality of Care Among Women from Central Mexico

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea B. Cruz-Castillo ◽  
María A. Hernández-Valero ◽  
Shelly R. Hovick ◽  
Martha Elva Campuzano-González ◽  
Miguel Angel Karam-Calderón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Central Mexico

Quality of Life and Breast Cancer Screening

1993 ◽  
pp. 131-141
Author(s):  
J. C. J. M. de Haes ◽  
H. J. de Koning
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening

scholarly journals Density and tailored breast cancer screening: practice and prediction – an overview

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 205846011879121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg J Wengert ◽  
Thomas H Helbich ◽  
Panagiotis Kapetas ◽  
Pascal AT Baltzer ◽  
Katja Pinker
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Breast Cancer Detection ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Average Risk ◽  
Screening Practice

Mammography, as the primary screening modality, has facilitated a substantial decrease in breast cancer-related mortality in the general population. However, the sensitivity of mammography for breast cancer detection is decreased in women with higher breast densities, which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. With increasing public awareness of the implications of a high breast density, there is an increasing demand for supplemental screening in these patients. Yet, improvements in breast cancer detection with supplemental screening methods come at the expense of increased false-positives, recall rates, patient anxiety, and costs. Therefore, breast cancer screening practice must change from a general one-size-fits-all approach to a more personalized, risk-based one that is tailored to the individual woman’s risk, personal beliefs, and preferences, while accounting for cost, potential harm, and benefits. This overview will provide an overview of the available breast density assessment modalities, the current breast density screening recommendations for women at average risk of breast cancer, and supplemental methods for breast cancer screening. In addition, we will provide a look at the possibilities for a risk-adapted breast cancer screening.

Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; Policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry J. de Koning ◽  
B. Martin van Ineveld ◽  
Gerrit J. van Oortmarssen ◽  
J. C. J. M. de Haes ◽  
Hubertine J. A. Collette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Policy Alternatives

More Than Just a Mammogram: Breast Cancer Screening Perspectives of Relatives of Women With Intellectual Disability

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nechama W. Greenwood ◽  
Deborah Dreyfus ◽  
Joanne Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Well Being

Abstract Women with intellectual disability (ID) have similar rates of breast cancer as the general public, but higher breast cancer mortality and lower rates of regular screening mammography. Screening rates are lowest among women who live with their families. Though women with ID often make decisions in partnership with their relatives, we lack research related to family member perspectives on mammography. We conducted a qualitative study of family members of women with ID, with an interview guide focused on health care decision making and experiences, and breast cancer screening barriers, facilitators, and beliefs as related to their loved ones. Sixteen family members underwent semistructured interviews. Important themes included mammography as a reference point for other social and cultural concerns, such as their loved one's sexuality or what it means to be an adult woman; fear of having to make hard decisions were cancer to be diagnosed acting as a barrier to screening; a focus on quality of life; and desire for quality health care for their loved one, though quality care did not always equate to regular cancer screening. Adults with ID are valued members of their families, and their relatives are invested in their well-being. However, families fear the potentially complicated decisions associated with a cancer diagnosis and may choose to forgo screening due to misinformation and a focus on quality of life. Effective interventions to address disparities in mammography should focus on adults with ID and their families together, and incorporate the family context.

scholarly journals Does regular quality control improve the quality of surgery in Slovenian breast cancer screening program?

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andraz Perhavec ◽  
Sara Milicevic ◽  
Barbara Peric ◽  
Janez Zgajnar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Quality Of Surgery

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of our study was to evaluate the quality of surgery of Slovenian breast cancer screening program (DORA) using the requested EU standards. Furthermore, we investigated whether regular quality control over the 3-year period improved the quality of surgical management.Patients and methodsPatients who required surgical management within DORA between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2018 were included in the retrospective study. Quality indicators (QIs) were adjusted mainly according to European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and European Breast Cancer Network (EBCN) recommendations. Five QIs for therapeutic and two for diagnostic surgeries were selected. Additionally, variability in achieving the requested QIs among surgeons was analysed.ResultsBetween 2016 and 2018, 14 surgeons performed 1421 breast procedures in 1398 women. There were 1197 therapeutical (for proven breast cancer) and 224 diagnostic surgical interventions respectively. Overall, the minimal standard was met in two QIs for therapeutic and none for diagnostic procedures. A statistically significant improvement in three QIs for therapeutic and in one QI for diagnostic procedures was observed however, indicating that regular quality control improves the quality of surgery. A high variability in achieving the requested QIs was observed among surgeons, which remained high throughout the study period.ConclusionsAdherence to all selected surgical QIs in patients from screening program is difficult to achieve, especially to those specifically defined for screen-detected lesions. Regular quality control may improve results over time. Reducing the number of surgeons dedicated to breast pathology may reduce variability of management inside the institution.

National survey of breast cancer screening in rural America.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Peppercorn ◽  
Kevin Houck ◽  
Adane Fekadu Wogu ◽  
Victor Villagra ◽  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Rural Women ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
College Education ◽  
Screening Mammography ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Annual Screening

13 Background: Screening mammography leads to early detection of breast cancer and improved survival. We conducted a survey of predominantly rural U.S. women who receive health insurance through the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) to evaluate the prevalence of annual and biennial screening and to identify potential disparities and barriers to breast cancer screening. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey of women between ages 40 and 65 who are insured by the NRECA regarding their utilization of mammography screening and barriers to screening. A study specific survey was mailed to 2,000 randomly selected eligible women without prior diagnosis of breast cancer. We assessed demographics and receipt of mammography within past 12 months (all women) and number of screening mammograms within the past 4 years (among women age 44 and older) to identify consistent annual screening and biennial screening patterns. Results: 1,204 women responded to the survey (response rate 60.2%). 74% live in rural areas, 18% suburban, 8% urban. 73% report less than 4 years college education and 19% have family incomes < $50,000/year. Overall, 72% reported screening mammography within 12 months, 59% reported consistent annual screening and 84% reported at least biennial screening. Rural women were less likely to undergo consistent annual (56% vs. 66%, p = 0.003) or biennial screening (82% vs. 89%, p = 0.01) compared to women in non-rural areas. Women under 50 were less likely to report screening within 12 months (67% vs. 77%, p = 0.0002), consistent annual (49% vs. 63%, p < 0.0001) or biennial screening (79% vs. 86%, p = 0.002). Significantly more rural women cited cost and distance as barriers, while busy schedule, fear of diagnosis, and fear of discomfort were important barriers among all demographic groups. Fear of the test was a greater barrier among younger vs. older women (p < 0.02). In univariate analysis; household income did not correlate with screening, and education was only a factor among younger women. Conclusions: A substantial percentage of rural U.S. women fail to undergo screening mammography. Potentially modifiable barriers include out of pocket expenses, convenience of screening, and fear of diagnosis and the test itself.

Breast cancer screening literacy information on online platforms: A content analysis of YouTube videos

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jasleen Brar ◽  
Ayisha Khalid ◽  
Mahzabin Ferdous ◽  
Tasnima Abedin ◽  
Tanvir C. Turin
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Wide Audience ◽  
Healthcare Resources ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Preventative Measures

BACKGROUND: The YouTube platform has great potential of serving as a healthcare resource due to its easy accessibility, navigability and wide audience reach. Breast cancer screening is an important preventative measure that can reduce breast cancer mortality by 40%. Therefore, platforms being used as a healthcare resources, such as YouTube, can and should be used to advocate for essential preventative measures such as breast cancer screening. METHODS: In this study, the usefulness of videos related to breast cancer and breast cancer screening were analyzed. Videos were first screened for inclusion and then were categorized into very useful, moderately useful, somewhat useful, and not useful categories according to a 10-point criteria scale developed by medical professionals based on existing breast cancer screening guidelines. Two reviewers independently assessed each video using the scale. RESULTS: 200 videos were identified in the preliminary analysis (100 for the search phrase ‘breast cancer’ and 100 for the search phrase ‘breast cancer screening’). After exclusion of duplicates and non-relevant videos, 162 videos were included in the final analysis. We found the following distribution of videos: 4.3% very useful, 17.9% moderately useful, 39.5% somewhat useful, and 38.3% not useful videos. There was a significant association between each of the following and the video’s level of usefulness: video length, the number of likes, and the uploading source. Longer videos were very useful, somewhat useful videos were the most liked, personally produced videos were the most not useful, and advertisements produced the highest ratio of very useful to not useful videos. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to create more reliable and useful healthcare resources for the general population as well as to monitor health information on easily accessible social platforms such as YouTube.

scholarly journals Breast cancer screening in Brazil. Barriers related to the health system

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Aloisio da Costa Vieira ◽  
Alessandro Formenton ◽  
Silvia Regina Bertolini
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Health System ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
The Public ◽  
Effective Order ◽  
Study Results

Summary Objective: Identify factors related to the health system that lead to a late diagnosis of breast cancer in Brazil. Method: We performed a systematic review in the PubMed and LILACS databases using as keywords "Breast cancer," "system of health" and "Brazil or Brasil." We evaluated the content of the articles using the PRISMA methodology based on PICTOS. The final date was 12/16/2015. We were able to identify 94 publications in PubMed and 43 publications in LILACS. After assessing the title and summary, and excluding 21 repeated publications, we selected 51 publications for full evaluation. At this stage, we excluded 21 articles, with 30 publications remaining for study. Results: The population coverage is low, and there are problems related to the quality of mammography. Patients with lower income, nonwhite and less educated are more vulnerable. We observed punctual and initial experiences in breast cancer screening. Diagnosis and treatment flows must be improved. The inequality in mortality reflects the differences related to screening structure and treatment. Better results are observed in well-structured services. Conclusion: There are several barriers in the health system leading to advanced stage at diagnosis and limiting the survival outcomes. The establishment of a rapid and effective order for diagnosis and treatment, based on hierarchical flow, are important steps to be improved in the public health context.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document