scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Elderly

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailesh Puntambekar ◽  
Rahul Kenawadekar ◽  
Archit Pandit ◽  
Akshay Nadkarni ◽  
Saurabh Joshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed safely in the elderly population

2007 ◽  
Vol 205 (3) ◽  
pp. S23-S24
Author(s):  
Anna R. Ibele ◽  
Anna Ibele ◽  
James Maloney ◽  
David Mahvi ◽  
Tracey L. Weigel
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sugita ◽  
T Nakamura ◽  
R Sawada ◽  
G Takiguchi ◽  
N Urakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Short And Long Term

Summary The number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer has increased in recent years. The use of thoracoscopic esophagectomy has also increased, and its minimal invasiveness is believed to contribute to postoperative outcomes. However, the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients. This retrospective study included 207 patients who underwent radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at Kobe University Hospital between 2005 and 2014. Patients were divided into non-elderly (<75 years) and elderly (≥75 years) groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed for sex and clinical T and N stage, with a total of 29 matched pairs. General preoperative data, surgical procedures, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, in-hospital death, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were compared between groups. The elderly group was characterized by lower preoperative serum albumin levels and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Intraoperative data and postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. The in-hospital death rate was 4% in the elderly group, which did not significantly differ from the non-elderly group. Cancer-specific survival was similar between the two groups. Although overall survival tended to be poor in the elderly group, it was not significantly worse than that of the non-elderly group. In conclusion, the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly versus non-elderly patients were acceptable. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and feasible modality for elderly patients with appropriate indications.

551 INCREASED POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaj Baranov ◽  
Nikolaj Baranov ◽  
Frans Van Workum ◽  
Camiel Rosman
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract   The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer is increasing. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy between elderly patients and younger patients and to compare outcomes after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) in these age groups. Methods Data was retrieved from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA), a national surgical outcome registry. The primary outcome parameter was severe complications, defined as Clavien Dindo ≥3. Secondary outcome parameters were postoperative complications, reintervention rate, length of hospital stay and mortality. Outcome parameters were compared between patients aged ≥75 years and < 75 years and between TMIE and OE in these age groups. We adjusted for the following casemix parameters: gender, Charlson Co-morbidity Index score ASA score and neoadjuvant therapy. A sensitivity analysis was performed with different age groups: <65, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79 and ≥ 80 years. Results Of all 5539 included patients 14.0% were aged ≥75 years and 86.0% were aged <75 years. Severe complications were observed more frequently in the elderly group compared to the younger group (RR = 1.15 [1.04–1.27], p = 0.007). Interestingly, there was an increased risk of severe complications after TMIE in both the elderly group (RR = 1.50 [1.19–1.90], p = 0.001) and the younger group (RR = 1.41 [1.28–1.56], p < 0.001). No difference in mortality between TMIE and OE was found. Sensitivity analyses of TMIE compared to OE across all age groups showed increased risk of severe complications. Adjustment for casemix for all analysis did not change the results. Conclusion Severe complications after esophagectomy occur more frequently in elderly compared to younger patients. TMIE in elderly patients did not result in less morbidity and was in fact associated with more severe complications compared to OE across all age groups, which may be due to a learning curve effect.

scholarly journals European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yassin Eddahchouri ◽  
◽  
Frans van Workum ◽  
Frits J. H. van den Wildenberg ◽  
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Delphi Methodology ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
European Consensus ◽  
Mckeown Esophagectomy

Abstract Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex and technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To master MIE, training in essential steps is crucial. Yet, no consensus on essential steps of MIE is available. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on essential steps in Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE through Delphi methodology. Methods Based on expert opinion and peer-reviewed literature, essential steps were defined for Ivor Lewis (IL) and McKeown (McK) MIE. In a round table discussion, experts finalized the lists of steps and an online Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international expert panel (7 European countries) of minimally invasive upper GI surgeons. Based on replies and comments, steps were adjusted and rephrased and sent in iterative fashion until consensus was achieved. Results Two Delphi rounds were conducted and response rates were 74% (23 out of 31 experts) for the first and 81% (27 out of 33 experts) for the second round. Consensus was achieved on 106 essential steps for both the IL and McK approach. Cronbach’s alpha in the first round was 0.78 (IL) and 0.78 (McK) and in the second round 0.92 (IL) and 0.88 (McK). Conclusions Consensus among European experts was achieved on essential surgical steps for both Ivor Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-surgeon experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Sundaram ◽  
Juan C. Geronimo ◽  
Brittany L. Willer ◽  
Masato Hoshino ◽  
Zachary Torgersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Surgeon Experience
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document