scholarly journals Students’ agency, creative reasoning, and collaboration in mathematical problem solving

Author(s):  
Ellen Kristine Solbrekke Hansen

AbstractThis paper aims to give detailed insights of interactional aspects of students’ agency, reasoning, and collaboration, in their attempt to solve a linear function problem together. Four student pairs from a Norwegian upper secondary school suggested and explained ideas, tested it out, and evaluated their solution methods. The student–student interactions were studied by characterizing students’ individual mathematical reasoning, collaborative processes, and exercised agency. In the analysis, two interaction patterns emerged from the roles in how a student engaged or refrained from engaging in the collaborative work. Students’ engagement reveals aspects of how collaborative processes and mathematical reasoning co-exist with their agencies, through two ways of interacting: bi-directional interaction and one-directional interaction. Four student pairs illuminate how different roles in their collaboration are connected to shared agency or individual agency for merging knowledge together in shared understanding. In one-directional interactions, students engaged with different agencies as a primary agent, leading the conversation, making suggestions and explanations sometimes anchored in mathematical properties, or, as a secondary agent, listening and attempting to understand ideas are expressed by a peer. A secondary agent rarely reasoned mathematically. Both students attempted to collaborate, but rarely or never disagreed. The interactional pattern in bi-directional interactions highlights a mutual attempt to collaborate where both students were the driving forces of the problem-solving process. Students acted with similar roles where both were exercising a shared agency, building the final argument together by suggesting, accepting, listening, and negotiating mathematical properties. A critical variable for such a successful interaction was the collaborative process of repairing their shared understanding and reasoning anchored in mathematical properties of linear functions.

Author(s):  
Bracha Kramarski

This study examined the relative efficacies of two different metacognitive teaching methods – problem solving (M_PS) and sharing knowledge (M_SK). Seventy-two Israeli sixth-grade students engaged in online mathematical problem solving and were each supported using one of the two aforementioned methods. M_PS students used a problem-solving and feedback process based on the IMPROVE model (Kramarski & Mevarech, 2003). In contrast, M_SK participants were instructed to reflect and provide feedback on the solution without an explicit model. This study evaluated each method‘s impact on the students’ mathematical online problem solving. It also examined self-regulated learning (SRL) processes by assessing students‘ online feedback using a rubric scheme. Findings indicated that M_PS students outperformed the M_SK students in algebraic knowledge and mathematical reasoning, as well as on various measures of sharing cognitive and metacognitive feedback. The M_SK students outperformed the M_PS students on measures of sharing motivational and social feedback.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Lisa Dwi Afri ◽  
Rahmadani Rahmadani

<p class="AfiliasiCxSpFirst" align="left"><strong>Abstrak:</strong></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle">Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang diajar dengan <em>Think Pair Share </em>(TPS) dan <em>Group Investigation </em>(GI) di kelas X MAS Amaliyah Sunggal. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan jenis eksperimen kuasi. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X MAS Amaliyah Sunggal Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020, yang selanjutnya dipilih sampel sebanyak dua kelas secara acak yaitu X-IPA3 dan X-IPA2. Data pada penelitian ini diperoleh melalui tes kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis. Selanjutnya data dianalisis menggunakan uji ANAVA dua jalur. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa, (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang belajar dengan TPS dengan siswa yang belajar dengan GI; dan (2) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran (TPS, GI) terhadap kemampuan matematis (penalaran, pemecahan masalah). Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran TPS dan GI memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda terhadap kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa.</p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle" align="left"><strong> </strong></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpLast" align="left"><strong>Kata Kunci</strong>:</p><p>Penalaran, Pemecahan Masalah, <em>Think Pair Share, Group Investigation</em></p><p> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpFirst" align="left"><strong><em>Abstract:</em></strong></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle"><em>The purpose of this research was to determine differences in students’s reasoning and mathematical problem solving abilities by cooperative learning in </em><em>Think Pair Share</em><em> (TPS) and </em><em></em></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle"><em>Group Investigation</em><em> (GI). This research was quantitative study and a quasi eksperimen. The population was all students of grade X MAS Amaliyah Sunggal in Academic Year 2019/2020, then two class is selected as sample randomly. They were X-IPA2 dan X-IPA3. Data was collected by test of </em><em>reasoning and mathematical problem solving. Then data were analyzed using the two-way ANAVA. The result showed that, (1) there were significant differences in the ability of reasoningg and mathematical problem solving of students who studied by TPS and students who studied by GI; and (2). There is no interaction between learning models (TPS and GI) and the mathematics ability (reasoning and problem solving). So it can be concluded that the TPS and GI gives a different effect on students’ mathematical reasoning and problem solving abilities.</em><em></em></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle" align="left"> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpLast" align="left"><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:</em></p><p><em>Reasoning, Problem Solving, Think Pair Share, Group Investigation</em><em></em></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (05) ◽  
pp. 1334-1350
Author(s):  
Thi Minh Phuong Ho

The main aim of this paper is to meassure students’ mathematical proficiency on conceptual understanding and procedural fluency, and their ability of integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge in problem solving. Based on the PCK taxonomy (Ho 2018), we design a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions with 22 tasks whose content is focus on linear functions and equations. The collected data is analysed by the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Moreover, we use the structural equation modeling (SEM) to study the correlation between these two components of mathematical proficiency and the ability of integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge in problem solving, implemented in IBM SPSS AMOS 24. The findings show that students’ mathematical proficiency on procedural fluency on linear functions and equations is higher than that of conceptual understanding, and their ability of integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge is very low. Moreover, these categories have a bi-directional relationship, in which the affection of mathematical proficiency on conceptual understanding to the ability of integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge in problem solving is stronger than on procedural fluency.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Elah Nurlaelah

Makalah ini menyajikan hasil kajian teori mengenai pembelajaran berbasis komputer, tugas resitasi, pengertian kreativitas dan daya matematik. Berdasarkan kajian tersebut dikembangkan bahan ajar pada mata kuliah Struktur Aljabar.  Pengembangan bahan ajar ini dirasa perlu untuk memfasilitasi aktivitas belajar yang dapat meningkatkan kreativitas, kemampuan pemecahan masalah (mathematical problem solving), berkomunikasi matematika (mathematical communication), bernalar matematika (mathematical reasoning), mengkaitkan ide matematika (mathematical connection), dan pembentukan sikap positif terhadap matematika (positive attitudes towards mathematics).Kata Kunci : Tugas Resitasi,  Kreativitas dan Daya Matematik.


1991 ◽  
Vol 84 (8) ◽  
pp. 647-655
Author(s):  
Robert L. Kimball

The mathematics curriculum should include the refinement and extension of methods of mathematical problem solving so that all students can recognize and formulate problems from situations within and outside mathematics. (NCTM 1989, 137)The mathematics curriculum should include the continued development of language and symbolism to communicate mathematical ideas so that all students can express mathematical ideas ora lly and in writing. (NCTM 1989, 140)The teacher of mathematics should pose tasks that … call for problem formulation, problem solving, and mathematical reasoning [and) promote communication about mathematics. (NCTM 1991, 25)


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-108
Author(s):  
Moch. Rasyid Ridha

This article reports the findings from an experimental pretest-posttest control group design conducted by using open-ended approach with Logan avenue problem solving (LAPS)-Heuristic model to investigate students’ mathematical problem solving and reasoning abilities. The study involved 88 grade-10 students from SMA in Bandung. The instrumens of this study are mathematical problem solving test and mathematical reasoning test. By using SPSS 2.0.0 and Microsoft Excel 2013, the study found the open-ended approach with Logan avenue problem solving (LAPS)-Heuristic was able to improve students’ mathematical problem solving and reasoning abilities better than that of conventional approach. Students’ mathematical problem solving and reasoning abilities were classified as mediocore. Furthermore, the study found there was medium correlation between mathematical problem solving and reasoning abilities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 647
Author(s):  
Siti Zakiyah ◽  
Syifa Halawatul Imania ◽  
Gustiani Rahayu ◽  
Wahyu Hidayat

The aims of this research are to know about mathematical problem-solving ability student of senior high school towards trigonometry material, mathematical reasoning ability student of senior high school towards the statistical material, and self-efficacy ability in mathematics learning students of a senior high school. The research used descriptive qualitative research, and the research object is XI IPA of senior high school. The chosen students are students who have learned about trigonometry and statistic. The chosen students who become sample are 30 students. In this research, the technic used tests, with the instruments used are question and questionnaire. The test consists of 5 question about mathematics problem-solving, 5 question of mathematical reasoning, and 40 questionnaires of self-efficacy ability. According to the results of our research, it can be concluded that the students' ability in problem-solving and reasoning mathematics is low, while students' ability in self-efficacy is good. It can be seen that the students have good self-efficacy ability along with the problem-solving ability and reasoning ability that are still low.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document