Comparative study of the international legal system of biodiversity conservation and the Iranian legal system of biodiversity conservation

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2503-2510
Author(s):  
M. Homauoni ◽  
M. Pournouri ◽  
S. A. Poorhashemi ◽  
D. Karimi
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Biodiversity Conservation ◽  
Legal System ◽  
International Legal System

The Spanish Translation of Les Leçons de chimie élémentaire: On the Legal Status of Translation and its Various Values

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 201-215
Author(s):  
Tania P. Hernández-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Complex Network ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Spanish Translation ◽  
Cultural Economic ◽  
Translation Rights ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
Latin American Countries ◽  
Legal Battle

Throughout the nineteenth century, European booksellers and publishers, mostly from France, England, Germany and Spain, produced textual materials in Europe and introduced them into Mexico and other Latin American countries. These transatlantic interchanges unfolded against the backdrop of the emergence of the international legal system to protect translation rights and required the involvement of a complex network of agents who carried with them publishing, translating and negotiating practices, in addition to books, pamphlets, prints and other goods. Tracing the trajectories of translated books and the socio-cultural, economic and legal forces shaping them, this article examines the legal battle over the translation and publishing rights of Les Leçons de chimie élémentaire, a chemistry book authored by Jean Girardin and translated and published in Spanish by Jean-Frédéric Rosa. Drawing on a socio-historical approach to translation, I argue that the arguments presented by both parties are indicative of the uncertainty surrounding the legal status of translated texts and of the different values then attributed to translation.

(Dis)solving the Chronological Paradox in Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lefkowitz
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Resolution Function ◽  
Customary International Law ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Normative Standard

As traditionally conceived, the creation of a new rule of customary international law requires that states believe the law to already require the conduct specified in the rule. Distinguishing the process whereby a customary rule comes to exist from the process whereby that customary rule becomes law dissolves this chronological paradox. Creation of a customary rule requires only that states come to believe that there exists a normative standard to which they ought to adhere, not that this standard is law. What makes the customary rule law is adherence by officials in the international legal system to a rule of recognition that treats custom as a source of valid law. Confusion over this distinction arises because in the international legal system the same agents whose beliefs give rise to a customary rule are the legal officials whose adherence to the rule of recognition leads them to deem that rule legally valid. The proposed solution to the chronological paradox employs H.L.A. Hart’s analysis of the concepts of law and a legal system, and in particular, the idea of a rule of recognition. Yet Hart famously denies the existence of a rule of recognition for international law. Hart’s denial rests on a failure to distinguish between the ontological and authoritative resolution functions of a rule of recognition, however. Once such a distinction is drawn, it can be argued that customary international law rests on a rule of recognition that serves the ontological function of making customary norms legal, though not the authoritative resolution function of settling disputes over the alleged legality of particular norms.

China’s Fairness Discourses and Allocation of Climate Responsibility

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-95
Author(s):  
Feiyue Li
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Fair Allocation ◽  
Active Engagement ◽  
Global Response ◽  
Climate Change Negotiations ◽  
The World ◽  
International Climate ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
Per Capita

Abstract The idea of ‘fairness’ may be viewed as fundamental to a nation’s participation in the development of the international legal system governing climate change. As the second-largest economy and the largest Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emitter in the world, China’s actions on climate change are critical to the global response. Indeed, international cooperation on climate change is unlikely to succeed without China’s active engagement. Therefore, China’s perception of the fairness of responsibility allocation will significantly influence its attitudes toward its international climate responsibilities. However, limited work has been done to date to concretely examine China’s perspective of the fairness of responsibility allocation and to understand its fairness discourses and practices of climate responsibility in a dynamically evolved process. This article aims to fill that gap in the literature by elucidating how China perceives the fair allocation of climate responsibility and how its fairness discourses and practices have evolved over the course of the three phases of international climate change negotiations. It will be shown that China has perceived the factors of historically accumulated emissions, per capita emissions and capability to lie at the very core of its understanding of fairness.

Consumer Protection in Jordanian Discount Sales: A Comparative Study with the Legislations of France, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Tariq Kameel ◽  
Fayez Alnusair ◽  
Nour Alhajaya
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Consumer Rights ◽  
Market Protection ◽  
Market Intervention ◽  
Constituent Elements ◽  
Shed Light

Abstract This article compares consumer protection in the framework of discounts with the constituent elements of such sales and the relevant methods of protecting consumer rights, according to French, Emirati, Jordanian, and Tunisian legislation and judicial practice. The findings shed light on the operation of consumer rights and market protection, and argues that each legal system has developed divergent means to attain the same goal. While some legal systems have organised sales with detailed rules, others have engaged in very limited market intervention; in the latter case, consumers are prevented from enjoying an important set of rights, as consumer rights and market protection are determined by the merchants.

scholarly journals СТАНОВЛЕННЯ ПАРАДИГМИ МІЖНАРОДНОГО ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНОГО ПРАВА У ПОСТРАДЯНСЬКІЙ ПРАВОВІЙ НАУЦІ

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 159-165
Author(s):  
Т. О. Анцупова
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
International Legal System ◽  
Philosophical Understanding

Домінуючою в сучасній науці міжнародного права пострадянського простору є нау­кова позиція, відповідно до якої ототожнюються «міжнародний судовий (юрисдикційний) процес» і «міжнародне процесуальне право». Автор статті зазначає безперспективність такої позиції для розвитку міжнародної правової системи, схиляючись до загальнофіло-софського уявлення про процес як про комплекс послідовних дій або послідовних, змінюючих один одного, органічно взаємопов'язаних явищ.   The scientific position, according to which «International Legal (Jurisdictional) Process» and «International Procedural Law» are identified is dominated in the modern international legal science on post-Soviet area. The author points out the futility of such a position for the development of the International Legal System, tending to the philosophical understanding of the process as complex sequential, successive, organically interrelated phenomena.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document