scholarly journals Update on Adverse Effects of HIV Integrase Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-387
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Kolakowska ◽  
Anaenza Freire Maresca ◽  
Intira Jeannie Collins ◽  
Johann Cailhol
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Future Research ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Childbearing Age ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Purpose of review The goal of this paper is to provide an up-to-date review of adverse events related to the class of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), which became the class of choice in few years. We sought answers specifically to issues pertaining to neuropsychiatric adverse events, as well as weight gain, which were the two most important categories of adverse events raised in recent studies based on real-life experience. The primary focus of this paper is on adults with a brief summary on pregnant women and children/adolescents. Recent findings Dolutegravir (DTG) bears the heaviest burden of neuropsychiatric side effects. Weight gain was reported with all INSTIs, although there are methodological caveats in the analyses and the findings need to be interpreted with caution. Moreover, due to recent findings on neural tube defects in infants exposed to dolutegravir during their peri-conception period, its use is not recommended for women of childbearing age without proper birth control method, while raltegravir remains the only drug which may be prescribed without caution. Given the importance of cognitive and metabolic co-morbidities in people living with HIV in regard to their quality of life, future research needs to focus on long-term effects of INSTIs in relation to these adverse events. Pharmacogenetics seems to be a promising tool. Safety during pregnancy is also another important issue to further clarify. Summary INSTIs are a generally well-tolerated class of antiretrovirals (ARV), and has a higher antiviral potency compared to other classes of ARV. Clinicians and patients need however to be aware of some red flags when starting with and monitoring patients on INSTIs. All INSTIs can lead to mild increases in creatinine levels, usually without clinical significance, but caution is needed in patients with low eGFR (<30ml/min), when using other nephrotoxic drugs, such as as tenofovir disoproxil. Neuro-psychiatric (NP) effects are to be monitored with INSTIs, especially with DTG (though reports are at times contradictory); clinicians might want to avoid DTG for patients with history of severe NP symptoms, until clarity is provided. Weight gain was reported with all INSTIs, especially with DTG, with possible differential effects according to sex and ethnicity (female and non-white patients being at increased risk). This is worrying since patients from African descent are at higher risk of cardio-vascular events and increased body mass index (BMI) can cause further increase metabolic risk. There is possibly an additional effect of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on weight increase. Discrepancies between clinical trials – with low rates of adverse events – and reports from real-life settings might be due partly to under-representation of some groups of patients in clinical trials, and/or the short duration of follow-up, since some adverse effects may only occur after prolonged exposure. Preliminary data on safety of bictegravir (BIC), from clinical trials and non-trial settings, are very reassuring and seem to show lower rates of adverse events compared to DTG. Elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/cobi) need to be used with caution in patients with other co-morbidities given potential for polypharmacy, as it is the case for aging patients, because of the high potential of drug-drug interactions due to effects of the cobicistat booster. We are awaiting the release of cabotegravir (CAB), which could represent a good option for patients struggling with adherence, despite injection site reactions. Pharmacogenetics is a promising way to explore adverse effects occurrence in the INSTI class.

scholarly journals 32 Quantifying the Prevalence of Frailty in Drug Trials and the Relationship with Serious Adverse Events

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i7-i11
Author(s):  
P Hanlon ◽  
E Butterly ◽  
J Lewsey ◽  
S Siebert ◽  
F S Mair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Drug Trials ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction Frailty is common in clinical practice, but trials rarely report on participant frailty. Consequently, clinicians and guideline-developers assume frailty is largely absent from trials and have questioned the relevance of trial findings to frail people. Therefore, we examined frailty in phase 3/4 industry-sponsored clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for three exemplar conditions: type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods We constructed a 40-item frailty index (FI) in 19 clinical trials (7 T2DM, 8 RA, 4 COPD, mean age 42–65 years) using individual-level participant data. Participants with a FI &gt;0.24 were considered “frail”. Baseline disease severity was assessed using HbA1c for T2DM, Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) for RA, and % predicted FEV1 for COPD. Using generalised gamma regression, we modelled FI on age, sex and disease severity. In negative binomial regression we modelled serious adverse event rates on FI, and combined results for each index condition in a random-effects meta-analysis. Results All trials included frail participants: prevalence 7–21% in T2DM trials, 33–73% in RA trials, and 15–22% in COPD trials. Increased disease severity and female sex were associated with higher FI in all trials. Frailty was associated with age in T2DM and RA trials, but not in COPD. Across all trials, and after adjusting for age, sex, and disease severity, higher FI predicted increased risk of serious adverse events; the pooled incidence rate ratios (per 0.1-point increase in FI scale) were 1.46 (95% CI 1.21–1.75), 1.45 (1.13–1.87) and 1.99 (1.43–2.76) for T2DM, RA and COPD, respectively. Conclusion Frailty is identifiable and prevalent among middle aged and older participants in phase 3/4 drug trials and has clinically important safety implications. Trial data may be harnessed to better understand chronic disease management in people living with frailty.

scholarly journals Opioid Use and the Risk of Respiratory Depression and Death in the Pediatric Population

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne R. Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND Pediatric patients may be at an increased risk of adverse effects from various medications. Recently, there have been a number of serious adverse events, including several pediatric patients experiencing severe respiratory depression and death as a result of the use of codeine for pain control following tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety of opioid agonists in pediatric patients undergoing operative procedures or have experienced trauma and to evaluate the risk of respiratory depression and death among this population. METHODS PubMed and Medline were searched to identify randomized controlled studies from 1994 to 2012 addressing postsurgery/trauma opioid use in pediatric patients. Relative risks and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using data available in clinical trials. RESULTS A total of 16 clinical trials were evaluated for this review. Randomized controlled trials included studies comparing opioids versus non-opioids for a variety of painful conditions. The relative risk of respiratory depression associated with opioid use in 1 trial was 1.63 (95% CI: 0.64–6.13). The remaining 15 trials reviewed described no significant difference in respiratory depression or adverse effects associated with treatment. No deaths were attributed to opioid use in any of these studies. CONCLUSION Opioid-associated respiratory depression was very rare and no deaths were reported in the reviewed studies. These findings under the well-defined conditions of controlled studies may not be the best means of determining overall opioid-associated side effects in pediatric patients.

scholarly journals ESTROGEN AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE: Effect of estrogen replacement on risk of recurrent stroke and death in the Women’s Estrogen for Stroke Trial (WEST)

Stroke ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 329-329
Author(s):  
Catherine M Viscoli ◽  
Lawrence M Brass ◽  
Walter N Kernan ◽  
Philip M Sarrel ◽  
Ralph Horwitz
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cerebrovascular Disease ◽  
Observational Research ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Estrogen Replacement ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Fatal Stroke ◽  
Increased Risk

71 Introduction: Observational research has produced conflicting findings concerning the effect of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on reducing risk for vascular events or death in women. To test the effect of ERT in women with established cerebrovascular disease, we designed a randomized trial of estradiol-17β(1 mg/day) vs. placebo. Methods: Participants were identified from 20 hospitals in New England. Eligibility criteria included age over 44, at least 1 year since last menstrual period, and TIA or non-disabling stroke within 90 days of entry. Randomization was stratified by baseline risk group and hospital. Primary trial outcomes were non-fatal stroke and all-cause death. Results: From December 1993-May 1998, 652 women were randomized (332 estradiol, 320 placebo). Index event was TIA in 164 subjects and stroke in 488. Mean age of subjects was 71 years (range 46–91); 84% were white, 13% black, and 4% other. Mean follow-up was 2.7 years (range: 18 days-5.8 years). At 1 year, 76% of subjects assigned to estradiol were on study drug. In the estradiol group, adverse events were diagnosed during follow-up in 8 subjects (1 pulmonary embolus (PE), 1 deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 5 breast cancers, 1 endometrial cancer) compared with 7 events in placebo subjects (2 PE, 1 DVT, and 4 breast cancers). Non-fatal strokes were confirmed in 51 subjects in the estradiol group vs. 52 in placebo subjects (rates at 3 years[R]: 16.8% estradiol vs. 17.4% placebo; logrank p-value[p]=.83). Death occurred in 46 estradiol subjects vs. 38 placebo subjects (R=13.0% vs. 12.6%, p=.89). At 3 years, combined rate of non-fatal stroke or death was 27.6% in the estradiol group vs. 27.7% in placebo [p=.80]. Conclusion: During an average follow-up of 2.7 years, estradiol treatment did not protect against recurrent cerebral ischemia or reduce all-cause mortality in postmenopausal women with pre-existing cerebrovascular disease. No increased risk for adverse events associated with estrogen was observed. This trial adds to the growing body of evidence that fails to confirm a protective role for ERT in populations with known vascular disease.

Update on Clinical Trials of Tadalafil Demonstrates No Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Adverse Events

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Jackson ◽  
Robert A. Kloner ◽  
Timothy M. Costigan ◽  
Margaret R. Warner ◽  
Jeffrey T. Emmick
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Increased Risk

Evaluating longitudinal toxicity of cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A pooled analysis from 1,302 patients in the ARCAD database.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3610-3610
Author(s):  
Guilherme Lopes ◽  
Jane Yeojeong So ◽  
Katrin Marie Sjoquist ◽  
Curtis L. Olswold ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Site Location ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Reporting Method ◽  
Entire Treatment

3610 Background: Chronic lower grade adverse events (AE) can negatively affect a patient’s quality of life but it is difficult to capture using a traditional toxicity reporting approach. A novel AE reporting method was recently developed to describe, summarize, and present longitudinal AE profiles(Lopes et al, 2021). We leveraged this method to describe and compare the AE profiles of doublet chemotherapy (DC) + Cetuximab and DC alone in mCRC patients. Methods: This AE reporting method utilizes two additional AE metrics to complement the maximum (max) toxicity grade usually reported in clinical trials. Onset time indicates the time period in which max grade for an AE occurred for the first time, defined here as “early” (i.e. within first 42 days) and “late” (i.e. after the 42nd day). AE Load (AEL) indicates the overall severity of an AE in the entire treatment. AEL varies from 0 to 1. Higher AEL indicates a worse overall severity of that AE over time. AEL is the key metric for describing chronic AE. We included patients receiving DC + cetuximab (n = 738) and DC alone (n = 564 [ref group]) from two randomized first-line trials in the ARCAD database. Diarrhea, rash, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), fatigue, anorexia, and mucositis were examined and adjusted for backbone (FOLFOX vs. FOLFIRI), ECOG PS, sex, site location, dose reduction, and treatment length. Results: For rash, DC + cetuximab had a higher risk of G3+ (21% vs. 0.5%; odds ratio {OR} [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 50 [16,157], p < 0.001), increased overall severity over the entire treatment (AEL = 0.257 vs. 0.069; Adjusted difference in means–Mdiff [95% CI] = 0.22 [0.21,0.23], p < 0.001), and increased risk of early onset (67% vs. 33%; OR [95% CI] = 4.3 [2.7,6.7], p < 0.001). DC + cetuximab also had higher AEL for rash across max grades (p < 0.001 within G1, G2, and G3+). For HFS, DC + cetuximab had a higher risk of G3+ (OR [95% CI] = 6.0 [2.5,14], p < 0.001), increased overall severity (AEL = 0.139 vs. 0.087; Mdiff [95% CI] = 0.03 [0.03,0.04], p < 0.001), and slightly earlier onset (12.4 vs. 13.9 weeks; Mdiff, weeks [95% CI] = -4.9 [-0.80,-9.0], p = 0.021). Within each max grade, DC + cetuximab did not have higher AEL of HFS. No associations were found for diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, or mucositis. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab is associated with higher grade, more persistent, and more immediate rash. The higher severity in HFS with the addition of cetuximab appears to be related to higher grade but not chronic HFS. This method may be useful to describe different strategies, e.g. intermittent cetuximab. It provided a comprehensive view of acute and chronic toxicity profiles supporting its potential interest as new metrics in clinical trials. Lopes GS, Tournigand C, Olswold CL, et al. Adverse event load, onset, and maximum grade: A novel method of reporting adverse events in cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials. 2021;18(1):51-60

scholarly journals Endocrine-related adverse events following ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: a comprehensive retrospective review from a single institution

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mabel Ryder ◽  
Margaret Callahan ◽  
Michael A Postow ◽  
Jedd Wolchok ◽  
James A Fagin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Increased Risk

Novel immune checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab, an antibody blocking the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), is revolutionizing cancer therapy. However, ipilimumab induces symptomatic, sometimes severe, endocrine immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are inconsistently recognized and reported. The objective of this review was to comprehensively characterize the incidence, presentation, and management of endocrinopathies following ipilimumab therapy in a single center that is highly specialized in immune checkpoint blockade. We carried out a retrospective analysis of endocrine irAEs in melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab therapy in clinical trials between 2007 and 2013. A total of 256 patients were included in this analysis. We reviewed pituitary-, thyroid-, and adrenal-related hormone test results, as well as radiographic studies and the clinical histories of patients, to identify and characterize cases of hypophysitis, hypothyroidism, thyroiditis, and adrenal dysfunction. Following ipilimumab therapy, the overall incidence of hypophysitis was 8% and that of hypothyroidism/thyroiditis 6%. Primary adrenal dysfunction was rare. Therapy with a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, also called PD1) receptor antibody, was associated with a 22% incidence of either thyroiditis or hypothyroidism and a 9% incidence of hypophysitis. Symptomatic relief, in particular, for hypophysitis, was achieved in all patients with hormone replacement, although endogenous hormone secretion rarely recovered. In summary, we observed that CTLA4 blockade alone, and in particular in combination with PD1 blockade, is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic, sometimes severe, hypophysitis as well as thyroid dysfunction. Prompt initiation with hormone replacement reverses symptoms. Evaluation and reporting of endocrine irAEs in clinical trials should be done using standardized diagnostic criteria and terminology.

scholarly journals Discovering Outliers of Potential Drug Toxicities Using a Large-scale Data-driven Approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. CIN.S39549
Author(s):  
Jake Luo ◽  
Ron A. Cisler
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Cancer Drugs ◽  
Data Driven Approach ◽  
Grubbs Test

We systematically compared the adverse effects of cancer drugs to detect event outliers across different clinical trials using a data-driven approach. Because many cancer drugs are toxic to patients, better understanding of adverse events of cancer drugs is critical for developing therapies that could minimize the toxic effects. However, due to the large variabilities of adverse events across different cancer drugs, methods to efficiently compare adverse effects across different cancer drugs are lacking. To address this challenge, we present an exploration study that integrates multiple adverse event reports from clinical trials in order to systematically compare adverse events across different cancer drugs. To demonstrate our methods, we first collected data on 186,339 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and selected 30 common cancer drugs. We identified 1602 cancer trials that studied the selected cancer drugs. Our methods effectively extracted 12,922 distinct adverse events from the clinical trial reports. Using the extracted data, we ranked all 12,922 adverse events based on their prevalence in the clinical trials, such as nausea 82%, fatigue 77%, and vomiting 75.97%. To detect the significant drug outliers that could have a statistically high possibility of causing an event, we used the boxplot method to visualize adverse event outliers across different drugs and applied Grubbs’ test to evaluate the significance. Analyses showed that by systematically integrating cross-trial data from multiple clinical trial reports, adverse event outliers associated with cancer drugs can be detected. The method was demonstrated by detecting the following four statistically significant adverse event cases: the association of the drug axitinib with hypertension (Grubbs’ test, P < 0.001), the association of the drug imatinib with muscle spasm ( P < 0.001), the association of the drug vorinostat with deep vein thrombosis ( P < 0.001), and the association of the drug afatinib with paronychia ( P < 0.01).

scholarly journals Identifying frailty in trials: an analysis of individual participant data from trials of novel pharmacological interventions

BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hanlon ◽  
Elaine Butterly ◽  
Jim Lewsey ◽  
Stefan Siebert ◽  
Frances S. Mair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Frailty is common in clinical practice, but trials rarely report on participant frailty. Consequently, clinicians and guideline-developers assume frailty is largely absent from trials and have questioned the relevance of trial findings to frail people. Therefore, we examined frailty in phase 3/4 industry-sponsored clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for three exemplar conditions: type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods We constructed a 40-item frailty index (FI) in 19 clinical trials (7 T2DM, 8 RA, 4 COPD, mean age 42–65 years) using individual-level participant data. Participants with a FI > 0.24 were considered ‘frail’. Baseline disease severity was assessed using HbA1c for T2DM, Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) for RA, and % predicted FEV1 for COPD. Using generalised gamma regression, we modelled FI on age, sex, and disease severity. In negative binomial regression, we modelled serious adverse event rates on FI and combined results for each index condition in a random-effects meta-analysis. Results All trials included frail participants: prevalence 7–21% in T2DM trials, 33–73% in RA trials, and 15–22% in COPD trials. The 99th centile of the FI ranged between 0.35 and 0.45. Female sex was associated with higher FI in all trials. Increased disease severity was associated with higher FI in RA and COPD, but not T2DM. Frailty was associated with age in T2DM and RA trials, but not in COPD. Across all trials, and after adjusting for age, sex, and disease severity, higher FI predicted increased risk of serious adverse events; the pooled incidence rate ratios (per 0.1-point increase in FI scale) were 1.46 (95% CI 1.21–1.75), 1.45 (1.13–1.87), and 1.99 (1.43–2.76) for T2DM, RA, and COPD, respectively. Conclusion The upper limit of frailty in trials is lower than has been described in the general population. However, mild to moderate frailty was common, suggesting trial data may be harnessed to inform disease management in people living with frailty. Participants with higher FI experienced more serious adverse events, suggesting screening for frailty in trial participants would enable identification of those that merit closer monitoring. Frailty is identifiable and prevalent among middle-aged and older participants in phase 3/4 drug trials and has clinically important safety implications.

How Accurate Is Clinician Reporting of Chemotherapy Adverse Effects? A Comparison With Patient-Reported Symptoms From the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 3485-3490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik K. Fromme ◽  
Kristine M. Eilers ◽  
Motomi Mori ◽  
Yi-Ching Hsieh ◽  
Tomasz M. Beer
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Reported

Purpose Adverse events in chemotherapy clinical trials are assessed and reported by clinicians, yet clinician accuracy in assessing symptoms has been questioned. We compared patient reporting of eight symptoms using a validated instrument, the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30 or QLQ) with physicians' reporting of the same symptoms in the study's adverse events log. Patients and Methods Thirty-seven men with metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer enrolled onto a phase II trial of weekly calcitriol and docetaxel completed the QLQ every 4 weeks for up to 28 weeks. A patient-reported symptom was defined as an increase in a QLQ symptom score by at least 10 points (0 to 100 scale), sustained for at least 4 weeks. A physician-reported symptom was considered present if it was ever documented in the adverse event log. Results Forty-nine (new or worsened) symptoms were detected by both physician and QLQ, 48 symptoms were detected by the physician alone, and 55 symptoms were detected by the QLQ alone. They agreed on the absence of a symptom in 102 instances of 254 possible opportunities. Their uncorrected agreement was 59.4%, but Cohen's κ, a coefficient of agreement that corrects for chance, was 0.15, indicating only slight agreement. Using the QLQ as the standard, overall physician sensitivity and specificity was 47% and 68%, respectively, although it varied considerably among symptoms. Conclusion Even in a tightly controlled clinical trial, physician reporting was neither sensitive nor specific in detecting common chemotherapy adverse effects. Tools for collecting patient-reported adverse event data in chemotherapy clinical trials should be developed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document