Comparable Outcomes Using Oral Dydrogesterone Vs. Micronized Vaginal Progesterone in Frozen Embryo Transfer: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuval Atzmon ◽  
Nardin Aslih ◽  
Daniela Estrada ◽  
Asaf Bilgory ◽  
Adrian Ellenbogen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Vaginal Progesterone

scholarly journals Retrospective cohort study on preparation regimens for frozen embryo transfer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique Atkinson ◽  
Jenny Crittenden ◽  
Howard Smith ◽  
Cecilia Sjoblom Ahlstrom
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Natural Cycles

Objective: To examine the pregnancy outcomes from frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles using different endometrial preparation regimens, compared to ovulation induction with letrozole (letrozole OI). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Fertility centre in Sydney, Australia. Patient(s): 6060 frozen embryo transfer cycles. Interventions: Cycles were stratified into one of four ways to achieve endometrial preparation. These were either a natural, letrozole OI, OI with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH OI) or a programmed cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was live birth rate per embryo transfer (LBR). Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy and biochemical pregnancy rates, adverse events including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, neonatal death and multiple births. Ovarian stimulation parameters were also analysed including time taken to reach the luteal phase and the number of blood or urine tests required for monitoring of the cycle. Results: The LBR following letrozole OI cycles was higher when compared to natural cycles (OR 1.27 (1.07 – 1.49)) and programmed cycles (OR 2.36 (1.67 – 3.34)). There was no significant difference between letrozole OI and FSH OI LBR (OR 0.99 (0.76 – 1.28)). An improved LBR with letrozole OI compared to natural cycles was maintained when only women with a normal length cycle were considered (OR 1.44 (1.10 – 1.89)). There was a significant reduction in miscarriage rates when letrozole OI was compared to programmed cycles (OR 0.46 (0.26 – 0.83)). Conclusion(s): The use of letrozole OI for endometrial preparation in an FET cycle may be associated with higher LBR and lower miscarriage rate, compared to using a programmed cycle.

scholarly journals Uterus Size May Affect Reproductive Outcome in Women with Adenomyosis After Gnrh- Agonist Pretreatment Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Ruiyi Tang ◽  
Peng Wu ◽  
Zhengyi Sun ◽  
jingran zhen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: GnRH-agonist is used to treat adenomyosis, but its efficacy in adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) is unclear. Methods：The retrospective cohort study comprised 112 adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement undergoing the first FET circle. A long-term GnRH-a pretreatment was administered to 112 patients with uterine enlargement. These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic effect: patients with a normal-size uterus after GnRH-a treatment (GN group) and patients with an enlarged uterus after GnRH-a treatment (GL group). Results：Not all patients can shrink their uterus to a satisfactory level. After receiving GnRH-a pretreatment, the uterus returned to normal size in 77% of patients (GN group), and 23% of patients had a persistently enlarged uterus (GL group). The pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were significantly higher in the GN group than in the GL group. Controlling for the confounding factors, normal uterus size (odds ratio [OR] 4.50; P=0.03) and low body mass index (OR 3.13; P=0.03) affected the odds of achieving live birth. The cut-off value selected on the ROC curve of uterus volume after GnRH-a treatment for detecting live birth was 144.7Conclusions：GnRH-a pretreatment was associated with the regression of adenomyosis lesions and improved clinical pregnancy outcomes in the adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement whose lesion are GnRH-a susceptible on FET cycles. However, about a quarter of patients may not be less responsive to GnRH-a and have poorer pregnancy outcomes, especially in overweight women.

scholarly journals Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3774
Author(s):  
Raksha K. Shetty ◽  
Purnima K. Nadkarni ◽  
Pooja P. Singh ◽  
Prabhakar Singh ◽  
Aditi A. Nadkarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Transfer Strategies

Background: Elective frozen embryo transfer (FET), has recently increased significantly with improvements in cryopreservation techniques. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials suggested that the endometrium in stimulated cycles is not optimally prepared for implantation; risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduced and pregnancy rates increased following FET and perinatal outcomes are less affected after FET. However, the evidence is not unequivocal and recent randomised control trials challenge the use of elective FET for the general IVF population. Pregnancy rates were analysed in a cohort of patients undergoing embryo transfers.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent embryo transfers from April 2018 to March 2019 at study centre in Surat.175 cycles of embryo transfers (119 fresh and 56 frozen) were included in the study. Outcomes measured were positive pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ongoing clinical pregnancy rates achieved in the IVF-ET cycles.Results: There were no statistically significant differences between positive pregnancy rate (54.6% versus 60.7%, Odds ratio (OR) 0.78; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.41-1.49), clinical pregnancy rate (48.73% versus 57.14%, OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.1- 2.64) and ongoing clinical pregnancy rate  (45.38% versus 51.78% OR 1.4; 95% CI 0.29 - 6.67) in fresh ET and FET cycles, respectively, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all measures.Conclusions: Despite the observed higher rates of positive biochemical, clinical and ongoing clinical pregnancy per transfer in the FET cohort, these did not reach statistical significance. Thus, both transfer strategies are reasonable options, although there is a trend favouring the freeze-all strategy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document