Survival of departments of obstetrics and gynecology: Ten points for Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics action in the 1980s

1982 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 626-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
William N. Spellacy
Keyword(s):  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

Have we met the educational challenges of obstetrics and gynecology? A response to the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Initiative of 1986

2002 ◽  
Vol 187 (5) ◽  
pp. 1405-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P. Metheny ◽  
Joseph M. Ernest ◽  
Jay Bachicha ◽  
Jessica Bienstock ◽  
Mary C. Ciotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Educational Challenges

scholarly journals Managing a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Times of COVID-19 Outbreak: The Foch Hospital Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rouba Murtada ◽  
Marie Carbonnel ◽  
Aurélie Revaux ◽  
Angeline Favre-Inhofer ◽  
Jean-Marc Ayoubi
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Hospital Experience ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Containment Measures

Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, as other departments, were faced with a major challenge at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fast restructuring was necessary in order to provide the means for COVID-related care. In this article we share our 1-year experience in reshaping our activities, managing healthcare workers and securing a pathway for pregnant patients, including potential, and confirmed COVID-19 cases. Priorities were set on ensuring patients' and healthcare workers' safety. Key containment measures included facemasks, systematic screening, dedicated spaces for COVID-19 cases with reinforced measures and vaccination campaign.

scholarly journals QUALIS EVALUATION OF MEDICINE III: ANALYSIS OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS JOURNALS

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 65-67
Author(s):  
Iracema de Mattos Paranhos Calderon
Keyword(s):  
Impact Factor ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To know the current publication of Anesthesiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology subareas, to support the updating of Qualis Journals criteria in these specific subareas. Method: Cross-sectional, descriptive study in which was evaluated in quantitatively and qualitatively way the bibliographic production of Anesthesiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology subareas, from January 2010 to December 2012. Were investigated the values of the impact factor; calculated (i) the number (n) and the percentage of journals in each stratum Qualis A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5, and (ii) the median values and their extreme limits (minimum values and maximum) and quartiles (p25; p50; p75; p90) of the impact factors in the different strata. Results: The bibliographic production of the three-year period 2010-2012 was published in 69 journals in Anesthesiology subarea and in 345 in Gynecology and Obstetrics. In Anesthesiology, 44% were within the limits of impact factor of superior A1, A2 and B1; in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 42.4% were in those limits and strata. Conclusions: Despite lagging behind by international standards, publications of Anesthesiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology showed tendency to improve the quality. In these sub-areas, the median of journals impact factor is beyond the limits defined by the area in the last assessment. Therefore, it must be reconsidered new indicators to assess this aspect.

scholarly journals Prevalence, Related Factors, and Levels of Burnout Syndrome Among Nurses Working in Gynecology and Obstetrics Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 2585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia I. De la Fuente-Solana ◽  
Nora Suleiman-Martos ◽  
Laura Pradas-Hernández ◽  
Jose L. Gomez-Urquiza ◽  
Guillermo A. Cañadas-De la Fuente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Personal Accomplishment ◽  
Burnout Syndrome ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

Background: Although burnout levels and the corresponding risk factors have been studied in many nursing services, to date no meta-analytical studies have been undertaken of obstetrics and gynecology units to examine the heterogeneity of burnout in this environment and the variables associated with it. In the present paper, we aim to determine the prevalence, levels, and related factors of burnout syndrome among nurses working in gynecology and obstetrics services. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature were carried out using the following sources: CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Medline, ProQuest (Proquest Health and Medical Complete), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), and Scopus. Results: Fourteen relevant studies were identified, including, for this meta-analysis, n = 464 nurses. The following prevalence values were obtained: emotional exhaustion 29% (95% CI: 11–52%), depersonalization 19% (95% CI: 6–38%), and low personal accomplishment 44% (95% CI: 18–71%). The burnout variables considered were sociodemographic (age, marital status, number of children, gender), work-related (duration of the workday, nurse-patient ratio, experience or number of miscarriages/abortions), and psychological (anxiety, stress, and verbal violence). Conclusion: Nurses working in obstetrics and gynecology units present high levels of burnout syndrome. In over 33% of the study sample, at least two of the burnout dimensions considered are apparent.

scholarly journals Elaboração de Atividades Profissionais Confiáveis (APCs) em ginecologia e obstetrícia para a graduação médica

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Mora De Marco Novellino ◽  
Izabel Cristina Meister Martins Coelho
Keyword(s):  
Delphi Technique ◽  
Field Method ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activities ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
International Literature ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Minimum Requirements ◽  
Medical Undergraduates ◽  
Teaching Learning

Abstract: Introduction: This article features “Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)” in the Obstetrics and Gynecology field designed for medical undergraduates, aiming to support the teaching/learning process. Objective: The aim is for the graduate to be competent to meet the minimum requirements necessary for the student in this field. Method: In this study, EPAs were created based on an international template already in use and validated using the Delphi technique. The structuring of the EPAs was based on the international literature: “Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency: Curriculum Developer’s Guide” from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The content for the topics of each EPA was based on the publication “The Obstetrics and Gynecology Milestone Project” from the joint action of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ABOG). Results: Thirteen EPAs were created with topics for teaching in that field during undergraduate school. A checklist was created for each EPA, aiming to guide the evaluator and the student regarding the performance of the tasks defined in the EPAs. Conclusion: The EPAs with checklists bring an innovative proposal for Obstetrics and Gynecology teaching in medical graduation since they facilitate and operationalize the learning, the development, and the observation of the acquisition of knowledge, skills and attitudes required for the performance of each topic in the area, thus helping the training of a competent professional. At the end of the medical course, the ability to perform all EPAs identifies a competent graduate in Gynecology and Obstetrics regarding the general practitioner.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Acute Abdomen Clinical Diagnosis and Differential Value of Ultrasonography

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2144-2152
Author(s):  
Yu Tian ◽  
Hong Luo ◽  
Min He
Keyword(s):  
Acute Abdomen ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynecology ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Abdominal Disease ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Clinical Emergency

Acute abdomen in obstetrics and gynecology is a common disease in clinical emergency, most of the patients have the characteristics of complex condition and rapid progress, and need to be treated through clinical diagnosis. There are many traditional diagnosis methods, but the accuracy is not ideal. Ultrasound is a widely used imaging technique in recent years, which has the characteristics of simple operation and high accuracy, so it is favored by doctors and patients in obstetrics and gynecology. In this study, 200 patients with acute abdomen in obstetrics and gynecology were selected, and the results of pathological examination were taken as the gold standard to evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound examination. As a result, the misdiagnosed ultrasound group was significantly lower after the diagnosis than in the normal group, the difference was significant (P > 0.05). Therefore, the use of ultrasound imaging, the clinical diagnosis of acute abdominal diseases in gynecology and obstetrics achieves a clear diagnostic effect, improves the diagnostic accuracy of patients with acute abdominal disease in the clinical. It is very important for the development of targeted therapeutic programmes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document