Variation in the Depth of the Anterior Chamber and Intraocular Pressure* *From the University Eye Hospital. Director: Prof. Dr. A. Hagedoorn. This is a Blaauwfund publication. Financial support was received from the Netherlands Organisation of Pure Scientific Research and from the Amsterdamsche Universiteitsvereniging.

1963 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 964-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.M. Bleeker
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. OED.S12672
Author(s):  
Kagmeni Giles ◽  
Moukouri Ernest ◽  
Domngang Christelle ◽  
Nguefack-Tsague Georges ◽  
Cheuteu Raoul ◽  
...  

We assessed the outcomes of the use of anterior chamber foldable lens for unilateral aphakia correction at the University Teaching Hospital of Yaounde. In this retrospective, non-comparative, consecutive case series study, we reviewed the records of patients who underwent an operation for aphakia correction by the means of injection of an angular supported foldable lens between January 2009 and December 2011 in the University Teaching Hospital Yaounde. Student's paired t-test was carried out to compare preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA) and intraocular pressure (TOP). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Twenty-one patients were included in the study; twelve were male (57.1%) and nine were female (42.9%). The mean age was 55.38 ± 17.67 years (range 9–75 years). The mean follow-up duration was 5.95 ± 3.14 months (range 2–12 months). The mean logMAR visual acuity was 1.26 ± 0.46 pre-operatively and 0.78 ± 0.57 post-operatively ( P = 0.003). The change in intraocular pressure was not statistically significant. Complications included intraocular hypertension (over 21 mmHg) in 3 patients (14.3%) and macular edema, pupillar ovalization, and retinal detachment in one patient each. The results indicate that injection of an angular support foldable lens in the anterior chamber is a useful technique for the correction of aphakia in eyes without capsular support. More extended follow-up, however, and a larger series of patients are needed to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of this procedure.


European Procedures on Debt Collection: Nothing or Noting? Experiences and Future ProspectsThis publication has been made possible with the financial support of the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research within its innovative research scheme (Vidi). This chapter results from a presentation at the conference ‘Civil Justice in the EU—Growing and Teething?’ co-organised by the Swedish Network for European Legal Studies in collaboration with the Faculty of Law at Uppsala University and the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg, Uppsala, October 2013. Part of the research and data on the Netherlands presented in section 3 relies heavily on earlier work, in particular XE Kramer, ML Tuil and I Tillema et al, ‘Verkrijging van een executoriale titel in incassozaken’, report for Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Security and Justice, 2012, in particular 112–18, available at: www.wodc.nl/onderzoeksdatabase/executoriale-titel.aspx, English summary, available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2259557; and XE Kramer and EA Ontanu, ‘The Functioning of the European Small Claims Procedure in the Netherlands: Normative and Empirical Reflections’ (2013) 3 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 319. The empirical research has been solely (European order for payment) or primarily (European small claims) conducted by the present author; the co-authors have granted permission to reproduce some of the data. See also for a consolidating paper in Dutch, XE Kramer, ‘Ervaringen met Europese civiele procedures in Nederland: een terugblik en wenkend toekomstperspectief’ (2014) 2 Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Europees Recht 99–108.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document