Meta-analysis of enteral nutrition as a primary treatment of active crohn's disease

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 1056-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Griffiths ◽  
Arne Ohlsson ◽  
Philip M. Sherman ◽  
Lloyd R. Sutherland
Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Comeche ◽  
Pablo Caballero ◽  
Ana Gutierrez-Hervas ◽  
Sofia García-Sanjuan ◽  
Iris Comino ◽  
...  

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease mediated by the immune system and is characterized by inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. One of the possible treatments for this pathology is a change in the type of diet, of which enteral nutrition (EN) is one. This study is to understand how the use of EN can affect the adult population diagnosed with IBD. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and a meta-regression. On the different databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, CINAHL, WOS), we found 363 registers with an accuracy of 12% (44 registers). After a full-text review, only 30 research studies were selected for qualitative synthesis and 11 for meta-analysis and meta-regression. The variables used were Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). EN has been shown to have efficacy for the treatment of Crohn’s disease and is compatible with other medicines. As for the CDAI or rates of remission, there were no differences between enteral and parenteral nutrition. Polymeric formulas have shown better results with respect to the CRP. The long-term treatment could dilute the good CDAI results that are obtained at the start of the EN treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumihito Hirai ◽  
Teruyuki Takeda ◽  
Yasumichi Takada ◽  
Masahiro Kishi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Beppu ◽  
...  

Abstract Enteral nutrition (EN) is effective in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients and has been shown to have an inhibitory effect on loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antibody therapy; however, the current level of evidence is not sufficient. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether EN in combination anti-TNF-alpha antibody therapy is useful in maintaining remission. PubMed was used to identify all relevant studies. A total of nine articles were identified including one randomized control trial, two prospective cohort studies, and six retrospective cohort studies. We performed a meta-analysis on all these articles to assess the remission maintenance effect of EN (n = 857). The remission or response maintenance effect in the EN group was 203/288 (70.5%), which was higher than 306/569 (53.8%) in the non-EN group. The odds ratio for long-term remission or response using fixed effects model and random effects model were 2.23 (95% CI 1.60–3.10) and 2.19 (95% CI 1.49–3.22), respectively. The usefulness of EN was unclear in two prospective studies that were conducted immediately after remission induction with anti-TNF-alpha antibody therapy was detected. Differences in the definition of relapse and the observation period among articles were considered to be limitations. This analysis suggests that EN is effective for maintaining remission in patients already in remission or response as a result of anti-TNF-alpha antibody maintenance therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document