Scientific problems in clinical scales, as demonstrated in the karnofsky index of performance status

1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 661-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Hutchinson ◽  
N.F. Boyd ◽  
A.R. Feinstein
Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2787
Author(s):  
Elena Laakmann ◽  
Isabell Witzel ◽  
Tanja Neunhöffer ◽  
Rudolf Weide ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
...  

Background: Brain metastases (BM) have become a major challenge in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients with asymptomatic BM (n = 580) in the overall cohort of 2589 patients with BM from our Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Network Germany (BMBC) registry. Results: Compared to symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were slightly younger at diagnosis (median age: 55.5 vs. 57.0 years, p = 0.01), had a better performance status at diagnosis (Karnofsky index 80–100%: 68.4% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), a lower number of BM (>1 BM: 56% vs. 70%, p = 0.027), and a slightly smaller diameter of BM (median: 1.5 vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients were more likely to have extracranial metastases (86.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.003) but were less likely to have leptomeningeal metastasis (6.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients underwent less intensive BM therapy but had a longer median overall survival (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) compared to symptomatic patients (10.4 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These analyses show a trend that asymptomatic patients have less severe metastatic brain disease and despite less intensive local BM therapy still have a better outcome (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) than patients who present with symptomatic BM, although a lead time bias of the earlier diagnosis cannot be ruled out. Our analysis is of clinical relevance in the context of potential trials examining the benefit of early detection and treatment of BM.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2053-2053
Author(s):  
Olivier Tournilhac ◽  
Romain Guièze ◽  
Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽  
Nienke Zinger ◽  
Henrik Sengeloev ◽  
...  

Introduction. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has typically an indolent course but can undergo transformation into a more aggressive lymphoma so called Richter's syndrome. While the advent of novel targeted therapies is transforming the management of patients with CLL, these drugs failed to prevent the risk of RS. RS is associated with a very poor outcome and is thus becoming the main obstacle to long term CLL control. Autologous (auto-) and allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (-SCT) have been recommended as the treatment of choice in eligible patients with clonally related RS (Rossi Blood 2018) but previous experience is still limited to less than 50 cases. We here aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of both auto- and allo-SCT for patients with RS in a large cohort in a period overlapping the advent of novel agents. Methods. We report on a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with RS who underwent auto- or allo-SCT between 2008 and 2018 in EBMT centers. Results. A total of 197 patients (M/F= 133/64) were included in the present study; 125 patients received allo-SCT and 72 auto-SCT. The main difference between these 2 cohorts was the median age at transplant that was lower in the allo- than in the auto-SCT group (median age 57 [18-71] vs 61 [39-74] years, p = 0.006). Regarding the allo-SCT cohort, median time from RS diagnosis to SCT was 10 months [1.1-322.8] and 54.2% had received >2 therapeutic lines for RS. At allo-SCT, 60 (48.4%) were in CR and 53 (42.7%) in PR or SD. Most patients received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen (n= 90, 72.6%) and peripheral blood (89.6%) as stem cell source. Donors were related (matched, n=40 (33%) or mismatched, n=4 (3%)) or unrelated (matched, n= 76 (61%) and mismatched, n=4 (3%). A total of 41 patients (33.6%) received total body irradiation (TBI). With a median follow-up of 48 months, 2-year OS was 46% (36-55%) and 2-year PFS 38% (28-48%). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 31% (22-40%) as was the 2-year NRM (Figure 1). Two-year CIR was significantly reduced in patients with ≤2 therapeutic lines for RS (12% (1-22%) vs 41% (26-55%); p=0.005). Performance status affected 2-y PFS (24% (7-42%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 43% (31-54%) if ≥90%, p = 0.02) and 2-y CIR (52% (33-71%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 25% (15-35%) if ≥90%, p = 0.004). Considering death as a competing risk, the day 100 incidence of aGVHD, 2-years limited and extensive cGVHD were 34% (25-43%), 20% (11-28%) and 33% (23-43%). Main causes of death were relapse (30%), GVHD (25%) and infection (30%). Regarding the auto-HSCT cohort, median time from RS diagnosis to HSCT was 7.8 months [2.6-102.7] and 66.7% had received >2 lines for RS. At auto-SCT, 36 (52.2%) were in CR and 36 (37.7%) in PR or SD. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 2-year OS was 69 % (56-82%) and 2-year PFS 47% (33-62%). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 46% (32-60%) and 2-year NRM was 7% (0-13%) (Figure 2). CR patients presented better PFS (69% (50-88%) vs 29% (9-50%); p=0.002) and OS (82% (66-97%) vs 56% (35-78%) ; p=0.03). Performance status affected 2-y PFS (25% (2-48%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 55% (38-73%) if >90%, p = 0.005) and 2-y OS (55% (29-82%) if Karnofsky index <90% vs 75% (60-90%) if >90%, p = 0.04). Disclosures Guièze: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Byrne:Ariad/Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Finke:Riemser: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau. Chevallier:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 2S269-2S280
Author(s):  
V. Gounant ◽  
G. Soussi ◽  
J. Pluvy ◽  
S. Brosseau ◽  
L. Hachon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 607-611
Author(s):  
Stefan Greuter

In der Onkologie existieren hunderte Scores und dutzende Stadieneinteilungen. Diese geben zum Beispiel Auskunft über die Ausdehnung und Prognose einer Tumorerkrankung oder werden bei Therapieentscheidungen mitberücksichtigt. Da bei der vorhandenen Vielfalt eine Beschreibung sämtlicher onkologischer Codes den Umfang dieser Arbeit bei weitem übersteigen würde, fokussiert der folgende Artikel im ersten Teil auf einige beispielhafte und weniger bekannte Scores und im zweiten Teil auf bedeutende Stadieneinteilungen in der Onkologie. Internet-Seiten wie Wikipedia oder Onkopedia bieten Antworten auf viele weitere Fragen rund um onkologische Scores und Stadien. Als Beispiel einer Tumorgraduierung wird der Gleason-Score beim Prostatakarzinom beschrieben. Dieser gibt nicht nur Auskunft über die Prognose der Erkrankung, sondern beeinflusst auch die Primärtherapie. Im Falle einer Metastasierung ist bei der Frage, ob eine (weitere) Systemtherapie durchgeführt werden soll, der Allgemeinzustand des Patienten entscheidend. Dieser wird mit dem Karnofsky-Index und noch häufiger dem ECOG- oder WHO-Performancestatus klassifiziert. Während einer Therapie wird bei soliden Tumoren das Ansprechen nach den RECIST-Kriterien beurteilt und mittels Kürzel in der onkologischen Diagnoseliste festgehalten. Die Ausbreitung solider Malignome wird nach der TNM-Klassifikation dokumentiert. Diese Klassifikation wird regelmäßig nach neusten prognostischen und therapeutischen Ergebnissen aktualisiert. Im Gegensatz dazu hat sich die Stadieneinteilung der Lymphome nach den klassischen Ann Arbor-Kriterien seit der Erstbeschreibung praktisch nicht verändert.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Roma ◽  
Federica Ricci ◽  
Georgios D. Kotzalidis ◽  
Luigi Abbate ◽  
Anna Lubrano Lavadera ◽  
...  

In recent years, several studies have addressed the issue of positive self-presentation bias in assessing parents involved in postdivorce child custody litigations. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) is widely used in forensic assessments and is able to evaluate positive self-presentation through its Superlative Self-Presentation S scale. We investigated the existence of a gender effect on positive self-presentation bias in an Italian sample of parents involved in court evaluation. Participants were 391 divorced parents who completed the full 567-item Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 during child custody evaluations ordered by several Italian courts between 2006 and 2010. Our analysis considered the S scale along with the basic clinical scales. North-American studies had shown no gender differences in child custody litigations. Differently, our results showed a significantly higher tendency toward “faking-good” profiles on the MMPI-2 among Italian women as compared to men and as compared to the normative Italian female population. Cultural and social factors could account for these differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document