Permanency planning for children in foster care: A review of projects

1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 95-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Rzepnicki ◽  
Theodore J. Stein
1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Albers ◽  
Thom Reilly ◽  
Barbara Rittner

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-338 ◽  
Author(s):  

The foster care system in America has evolved as a means of providing protection and shelter for children who require out-of-home placement.1 It is designed to be a temporary service, with a goal of either returning children home or arranging for suitable adoptive homes. In recent years, child welfare agencies have been directing greater efforts toward supporting families in crisis to prevent foster care placements whenever feasible and to reunify families as soon as possible when placements cannot be avoided. Increasingly, extended family members are being recruited and assisted in providing kinship care for children when their biologic parents cannot care for them. However, during the past decade the number of children in foster care has nearly doubled, despite landmark federal legislation designed to expedite permanency planning for children in state custody.2 It is estimated that by 1995 more than 500 000 children will be in foster care.3 In large part, this unrelenting trend is the result of increased abuse and neglect of children occurring in the context of parental substance abuse, mental illness, homelessness, and human immunodeficiency virus infection.4 As a result, a disproportionate number of children placed in foster care come from that segment of the population with the fewest social and financial resources and from families that have few personal and limited extended family sources of support.5 It is not surprising then that children entering foster care are often in poor health. Compared with children from the same socioeconomic background, they suffer much higher rates of serious emotional and behavioral problems, chronic physical disabilities, birth defects, developmental delays, and poor school achievement.6-13


Author(s):  
R. Kevin Grigsby

Frequent, regular parent–child visitation of children in foster care is crucial in maintaining the attachment relationship of the parent and child. Further, the parent–child attachment concept is crucial for permanency planning because it is the rationale behind the goal of providing children with a stable and continuous relationship with the parent or another caretaker, if that child cannot return to the care of the parent. In order to ascertain whether protective services workers recognize and emphasize the importance of maintaining parent–child or other attachment relationships, the author studied closed case records of children who had experienced foster-care placement. Results are discussed in the context of social-attachment theory.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1007-1009
Author(s):  

Pediatricians who provide care for children in foster care have a unique opportunity and a special responsibility to assess the totality of the child's experience and to be a sympathetic and objective advocate for the child.1 Many children in foster care have suffered repeated abuse and prolonged neglect and often have a myriad of unmet medical and mental health needs.2 However, paramount in the lives of these children is their need for continuity and a sense of permanence. Legal responsibility for establishing where these children will live and which adults will have custody of them rests jointly with the child welfare system and the judiciary. Pediatricians and other professionals with expertise in child development should participate actively as advisors to social workers and judges about the child's needs and best interests, especially in the context of placement and permanency planning. Maintaining the integrity of distressed families by providing adequate support services is generally in the best interest of the child. Keeping families together, however, may not be best for all children. Alternatives based upon an assessment of the developmental needs of the children and the capabilities of the family to meet those needs must be given consideration. As a society we value the rights of the birth family, sometimes hold them to be inviolable, and presume that families are competent. This belief and a lack of resources for assessment, planning, and services have resulted in inaccurate assessment of the child's relationships with his/her family by social service agencies and courts.


1982 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Denzil McCotter

Most of the pioneering work in relation to permanency planning has been carried out in Oregon by the Regional Research Institute for Human Services and the State Children's Services Department. As the Oregon project has been documented in great detail in five excellent volumes: 1. Barriers to Planning for Children in Foster Care (1976) Regional Research Institute for Human Services Portland State University;2. Overcoming Barriers for Children in Care, (Emlen et al. 1977);3. Permanent Planning for Children in Foster Care: A Handbook for Social Workers (Pike et al.) 1977);4. Permanent Planning in Foster Care: A Guide for Programme Planners (Dreyer, 1978);5. Permanent Planning in Foster Care: Resources for Training (Downs & Taylor, 1978); and as the utilisation of the Oregon model has been encouraged by the allocation of federal funds to those States wishing to develop it for their own use, it seems appropriate to examine the model and its operation in some detail. Following this, efforts to develop permanency planning elsewhere will be examined and analysed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document