Sheath-like folds and progressive fold deformation in tertiary sedimentary rocks of the Shimanto accretionary complex, Japan

1987 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 845-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Hibbard ◽  
Daniel E. Karig
1993 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Doubleday ◽  
D. I. M. Macdonald ◽  
P. A. R. Nell

AbstractThe Mesozoic forearc of Alexander Island, Antarctica, is one of the few places in the world where the original stratigraphic relationship between a forearc basin and an accretionary complex is exposed. Newlydiscovered sedimentary rocks exposed at the western edge of the forearc basin fill (the Kimmeridgian–Albian Fossil Bluff Group) record the events associated with the basin formation. These strata are assigned to the newly defined Selene Nunatak Formation (?Bathonian) and Atoll Nunataks Formation (?Bathonian-Tithonian) within the Fossil Bluff Group.The Selene Nunatak Formation contains variable thicknesses of conglomeratesand sandstones, predominantly derived from the LeMay Group accretionary complex upon which it is unconformable. The formation marks emergence and subsequent erosion of the inner forearc area. It is conformably overlain by the1 km thick Atoll Nunataks Formation, characterized by thinly-bedded mudstones and silty mudstones representing a marine transgression followed by trench-slope deposition. The Atoll Nunataks Formation marks a phase of subsidence, possibly in response to tectonic events in the accretionary prism that are known to have occurred at about the same time.The Atoll Nunataks Formation is conformably overlain by the Himalia Ridge Formation, a thick sequence of basin-wide arc-derived conglomerates. This transition from fine- to coarse-grained deposition suggests that a well-developed depositional trough (and hence trench-slope break) had formed by that time. The Atoll Nunataks Formation therefore spans the formation of the forearc basin, and marks the transition from trench-slope to forearc basin deposition.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Hara ◽  
Tetsuya Tokiwa ◽  
Toshiyuki Kurihara ◽  
Thasinee Charoentitirat ◽  
Apsorn Sardsud

Abstract Detrital zircon U–Pb ages for sediments in and around the Palaeo-Tethyan convergence zone in northern Thailand provide constraints for tectonic interpretations of the Indochina Block, the Sibumasu Block, the Inthanon Zone accretionary complex and the Nan Back-arc Basin during the Triassic. In sedimentary rocks of the Indochina Block, almost all of the Palaeozoic and Triassic zircons were sourced from the collision zone between the Indochina and South China blocks, and an active continental margin in the western Indochina Block. Sediments of the Sibumasu Block were supplied by erosion of Archaean basement and from the Grenville and the Pan African orogenies, but show no record of Permian to Triassic igneous activity. Accretionary complex sediments have provenances of both the Sukhothai Arc and the Indochina and South China blocks, with detrital zircons of various ages being supplied from crustal uplift and erosion related to the Indosinian I orogeny. Sedimentary rocks of the Nan Back-arc Basin are widely distributed not only in the Nan–Uttaradit but also in northern Sukhothai areas. The origin of the Pha Som Metamorphic Complex and associated formations can be traced to basin-filling sediments in the Nan Back-arc Basin. These detrital zircon U–Pb ages have also allowed identification of the changing tectonic setting in the Palaeo-Tethys convergence zone from the ‘erosion of Proterozoic continental basement’ to ‘Palaeozoic active continental margin in the western Indochina Block’ and ‘Palaeozoic, Permian to Triassic collision zone between the South China and Indochina blocks’ through to ‘Triassic active Sukhothai Arc’.


Author(s):  
Yujiro Ogawa

ABSTRACTVarious order duplex structures are described from oceanic sequences of basaltic and associated pelagic–hemipelagic sedimentary rocks in the Ordovician (northern) part of the Southern Uplands accretionary complex. The general structure of the terrane as a whole strikes ENE, but each component lithological tract strikes NE or more northerly, oblique to the regional trend, making an en echelon outcrop pattern. Further oblique relationships between structures and lithologies can be mapped at larger scales, up to 1 km scale or more. These duplex structures are thought to be originally SE-verging, now partly overturned to the NW. Differences in the en echelon geometry, either sinistral or dextral, are explained by variable plunge of the original structures.Peach & Home's first regional map of the Southern Uplands suggests an en echelon pattern of lithologies, implying large-scale duplex structures across the whole terrane. Here, the duplex structures are regarded as ubiquitous at both regional and smaller scales, suggesting considerable horizontal shortening. This was accommodated by such structures during underplating and out-of-sequence thrusting, in all parts of the accretionary prism, but particularly in the deeper tectonostratigraphic levels. The duplex structures are characteristic of ancient décollement zones.


Author(s):  
Thomas R. McKee ◽  
Peter R. Buseck

Sediments commonly contain organic material which appears as refractory carbonaceous material in metamorphosed sedimentary rocks. Grew and others have shown that relative carbon content, crystallite size, X-ray crystallinity and development of well-ordered graphite crystal structure of the carbonaceous material increases with increasing metamorphic grade. The graphitization process is irreversible and appears to be continous from the amorphous to the completely graphitized stage. The most dramatic chemical and crystallographic changes take place within the chlorite metamorphic zone.The detailed X-ray investigation of crystallite size and crystalline ordering is complex and can best be investigated by other means such as high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The natural graphitization series is similar to that for heat-treated commercial carbon blacks, which have been successfully studied by HRTEM (Ban and others).


1989 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. Wolberg

The minerals pyrite and marcasite (broadly termed pyritic minerals) are iron sulfides that are common if not ubiquitous in sedimentary rocks, especially in association with organic materials (Berner, 1970). In most marine sedimentary associations, pyrite and marcasite are associated with organic sediments rich in dissolved sulfate and iron minerals. Because of the rapid consumption of sulfate in freshwater environments, however, pyrite formation is more restricted in nonmarine sediments (Berner, 1983). The origin of the sulfur in nonmarine environments must lie within pre-existing rocks or volcanic detritus; a relatively small, but significant contribution may derive from plant and animal decomposition products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document