Residual stresses in austenitic stainless steel primary coolant pipes and welds of pressurized water reactors

1996 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Faure ◽  
R.H. Leggatt
2019 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 03003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Lamirand ◽  
Axel Laureau ◽  
Dimitri Rochman ◽  
Gregory Perret ◽  
Adrien Gruel ◽  
...  

The PETALE experimental programme in the CROCUS reactor at EPFL intends to contribute to the validation and improvement of neutron nuclear data in the MeV energy range for stainless steel, particularly in the prospect of heavy reflector elements of pressurized water reactors. It mainly consists of several transmission experiments: first, through metallic sheets of nuclear-grade stainless steel interleaved with dosimeter foils, and, successively, through its elemental components of interest – iron, nickel, and chromium. The present article describes the study for optimizing the response of the dosimetry experiments to the nuclear data of interest.


2011 ◽  
Vol 681 ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alix Bonaventur ◽  
Danièle Ayrault ◽  
Guillaume Montay ◽  
Vincent Klosek

Dissimilar metal joints between pipes of ferritic and austenitic steels are present in primary coolant circuit of pressurized water reactors. Over the last years in particular in USA and Japan, stress corrosion cracks, often associated with weld repairs, have been observed for some dissimilar welds made with an Inconel filler metal. The integrity of this type of components is thus a major safety issue. In this context, the goal of this work is to evaluate the welding residual stresses field for a dissimilar weld joint. A representative bi-metallic tubular weld joint was fabricated and residual stresses profiles in the different weld zones were evaluated by means of the hole drilling and neutron diffraction methods.


Author(s):  
Robert O. McGill ◽  
David O. Harris ◽  
Ken Wolfe

Over the past ten years, a significant amount of research has been conducted regarding mixing tee thermal fatigue in pressurized water reactors prompted by the leakage event at Civaux Unit 1 in 1998. The plant experienced a leak in the reactor residual heat removal system piping after a short period of operation during plant start-up. An evaluation as to the cause of the leakage concluded that mixing of hot and cold fluid upstream from the failed austenitic stainless steel elbow resulted in thermal fatigue cracking. Recently, an assessment of susceptibility to this thermal fatigue mechanism in boiling water reactors in the United States was completed. The piping systems in these reactors where the potential for thermal mixing exists are predominantly constructed of carbon steel. Thus, an analytical model was developed for predicting mixing tee thermal fatigue in carbon steel piping based on the austenitic stainless steel piping operating experience at Civaux. This paper describes how the model was developed and presents some general findings.


Author(s):  
F. W. Brust ◽  
D.-J. Shim ◽  
G. Wilkowski ◽  
D. Rudland

Flaw indications have been found in some dissimilar metal (DM) nozzle to stainless steel piping welds and reactor pressure vessel heads (RPVH) in pressurized water reactors (PWR) throughout the world. The nozzle welds usually involve welding ferritic (often A508) nozzles to 304/316 stainless steel pipe) using Alloy 182/82 weld metal. The welds may become susceptible to a form of corrosion cracking referred to as primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC). It can occur if the temperature is high enough (usually >300C) and the water chemistry in the PWR is typical of operating plants. The weld residual stresses (WRS) induced by the welds are a main driver of PWSCC. Several mechanical mitigation methods to control PWSCC have been developed for use on a nozzle welds in nuclear PWR plants. These methods consist of applying a weld overlay repair (WOR), using a method called mechanical stress improvement process (MSIP), and applying an inlay to the nozzle ID. The purpose of a mitigation method is to reduce the probability that PWSCC will occur in the nozzle joint. The key to assessing the effectiveness of mitigation is to determine the crack growth time to leak with and without the mitigation. Indeed, for WOR and MSIP, the weld residual stresses are often reduced after application while for inlay they are actually increased. However, all approaches reduce crack growth rates if applied properly. Procedures for modeling PWSCC growth tend to vary between organizations performing the analyses. Currently, the prediction of PWSCC crack growth is based on the stress intensity factors at the crack tips. Several methods for evaluating the stress intensity factor for modeling the crack growth through these WRS fields are possible, including using analytical, natural crack growth using finite element methods, and using the finite element alternating method. This paper will summarize the methods used, critique the procedures, and provide some examples for crack growth with and without mitigation. Suggestions for modeling such growth will be provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document