A two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of a tidal estuary

1979 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy A Walters ◽  
Ralph T Cheng
1995 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 2147-2155 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Pejcinovic ◽  
H.H.K. Tang ◽  
J.L. Egley ◽  
L.R. Logan ◽  
G.R. Srinivasan

New Astronomy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 23-24 ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankan Das ◽  
Liton Majumdar ◽  
Sandip K. Chakrabarti ◽  
Sonali Chakrabarti

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1697-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Papadaki ◽  
Vasilis Bellos ◽  
Lazaros Ntoanidis ◽  
Elias Dimitriou

Abstract Hydraulic-habitat models combine the dynamic behavior of river discharge with geomorphological and ecological responses. In this study, they are used for estimating environmental flow requirements. We applied a Pseudo-two-dimensional (2D) model based on the one-dimensional (1D) HEC-RAS model and an in-house 2D (FLOW-R2D) hydrodynamic model to a section of river for several flows in respect of summer conditions of the study reach, and compared the results derived from the models in terms of water depths and velocities as well as habitat predictions in terms of weighted usable area (WUA). In general, 2D models are more promising in habitat studies since they quantify spatial variations and combinations of flow patterns important to stream flora and fauna in a higher detail than the 1D models. Relationships between WUA and discharge for the two models were examined, to compare the similarity as well as the magnitude of predictions over the modelled discharge range. The models predicted differences in the location of maxima and changes in variation of velocity and water depth. Finally, differences in spatial distribution (in terms of suitability indices and WUA) between the Pseudo-2D and the fully 2D modelling results can be considerable on a cell-by-cell basis.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 3741-3749 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gonzalez-Esparza ◽  
A. Santillán ◽  
J. Ferrer

Abstract. We studied the heliospheric evolution in one and two dimensions of the interaction between two ejecta-like disturbances beyond the critical point: a faster ejecta 2 overtaking a previously launched slower ejecta 1. The study is based on a hydrodynamic model using the ZEUS-3-D code. This model can be applied to those cases where the interaction occurs far away from the Sun and there is no merging (magnetic reconnection) between the two ejecta. The simulation shows that when the faster ejecta 2 overtakes ejecta 1 there is an interchange of momentum between the two ejecta, where the leading ejecta 1 accelerates and the tracking ejecta 2 decelerates. Both ejecta tend to arrive at 1AU having similar speeds, but with the front of ejecta 1 propagating faster than the front of ejecta 2. The momentum is transferred from ejecta 2 to ejecta 1 when the shock initially driven by ejecta 2 passes through ejecta 1. Eventually the two shock waves driven by the two ejecta merge together into a single stronger shock. The 2-D simulation shows that the evolution of the interaction can be very complex and there are very different signatures of the same event at different viewing angles; however, the transferring of momentum between the two ejecta follows the same physical mechanism described above. These results are in qualitative agreement with in-situ plasma observations of "multiple magnetic clouds" detected at 1AU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document