The relative importance of common factors across the European equity markets

1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stan Beckers ◽  
Richard Grinold ◽  
Andrew Rudd ◽  
Dan Stefek
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Koutmos ◽  
Johan Anders Knif ◽  
George C. Philippatos

Author(s):  
Charlotte Blease ◽  
John M. Kelley ◽  
Manuel Trachsel

This chapter focuses on what information should be provided to patients about the evidence base supporting the clinical effectiveness of psychotherapy. In particular, the authors consider whether research on the relative efficacy of different forms of psychotherapy should be provided to patients, as well as whether patients should be provided with information on the relative importance of common factors versus specific factors as the causal agents of clinical improvement. After a critical review and discussion of the relatively few scholarly papers that have previously addressed this question, the authors conclude that patients should be provided with an honest, transparent, and impartial summary of the evidence related to their treatment options including information about the common factors. The authors offer this conclusion even while acknowledging that considerable controversy persists about how to interpret the psychotherapy research evidence base. Finally, the authors strongly support continued research into these questions, especially given the relatively limited scholarly attention they have received to date.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieven Baele

AbstractThis paper investigates to what extent globalization and regional integration lead to increasing equity market interdependence. I focus on Western Europe, as this region has gone through a unique period of economic, financial, and monetary integration. More specifically, I quantify the magnitude and time-varying nature of volatility spillovers from the aggregate European (EU) and U.S. market to 13 local European equity markets. To account for time-varying integration, I use a regime-switching model to allow the shock sensitivities to change over time. I find regime switches to be both statistically and economically important. Both the EU and U.S. shock spillover intensity increased substantially over the 1980s and 1990s, though the rise is more pronounced for EU spillovers. Shock spillover intensities increased most strongly in the second half of the 1980s and the first half of the 1990s. I show that increased trade integration, equity market development, and low inflation contribute to the increase in EU shock spillover intensity. I also find evidence for contagion from the U.S. market to a number of local European equity markets during periods of high world market volatility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document