Bubble Shape and Interfacial Area Concentration Measurements in Upward and Downward Bubbly Flow

1995 ◽  
pp. 733-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Zun ◽  
M. Kljenak ◽  
M. Pecar ◽  
E. Polutnik
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Goda ◽  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Sidharth S. Paranjape ◽  
Joshua P. Finch ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
...  

The local interfacial structure for vertical air-water co-current downward two-phase flow was investigated under adiabatic conditions. A multi-sensor conductivity probe was utilized in order to acquire the local two-phase flow parameters. The present experimental loop consisted of 25.4 mm and 50.8 mm ID round tubes as test sections. The measurement was performed at three axial locations: L/D = 13, 68 and 133 for the 25.4 mm ID loop and L/D = 7, 34, 67 for the 50.8 mm ID loop, in order to study the axial development of the flow. A total of 7 and 10 local measurement points along the tube radius were chosen for the 25.4 mm ID loop and the 50.8 mm ID loop, respectively. The experimental flow conditions were determined within bubbly flow regime. The acquired local parameters included the void fraction, interfacial area concentration, bubble interface frequency, bubble Sauter mean diameter, and interfacial velocity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Furuhashi ◽  
Takuro Sasaki ◽  
Shuichiro Miwa

Abstract Gas-liquid two-phase flow has high potential in heat transfer and mixing capabilities, and therefore it is utilized in various technologies such as nuclear reactor and chemical plants. There are several flow regimes since the gas-liquid interface transforms constantly. For the sake of safety and optimization in operating plants, it is crucial to understand the behavior of the gas-liquid interface. We have focused on extracting the bubble features in the bubbly flow by filming the bubbly flow with a high-speed camera and training convolutional neural network (CNN) for feature extraction. The assumption made was bubbles in the bubbly flow being ellipsoids. Since void fraction and interfacial area concentration are one of the geometric parameters in the two-phase flow models, like two-fluid model, it becomes possible to evaluate the flow field of the two-phase flow quickly and quantitively by calculating these parameters from the extracted features. We have compared two-phase flow parameters with the conventional object detection method using bounding boxes, and the new ellipse fitting method to identify the best region proposal shape. As a result, the conventional method showed higher accuracy in extracting bubble features under our flow conditions.


Author(s):  
Akimaro Kawahara ◽  
Michio Sadatomi ◽  
Yutaro Nakamoto ◽  
Takatoshi Masuda

Most of the recent subchannel analysis codes are based on a multifluid model, and an accurate evaluation of the constitutive equations in the model is essential. In order to get an accurate interfacial friction force in two-phase bubble flows, experimental data on drag coefficient and interfacial area concentration have been obtained for air-water flows in a 2×1 rod channel simplifying a boiling water nuclear reactor fuel rod bundle. In order to know the effects of liquid properties on the data, the temperature of the test water was changed from 18°C to 50°C. The data are compared with the existing correlations reported in literatures. As a result, the semitheoretical correlation of Hibiki and Ishii (2001, “Interfacial Area Concentration in Steady Fully-Developed Bubbly Flow,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 44, pp. 3443–3461) was found to give the best prediction against the present interfacial area concentration data. The correlation of Delhaye and Bricard (1994, “Interfacial Area in Bubbly Flow: Experimental Data and Correlations,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 151, pp. 65–77) also gave a reasonably good prediction if their correlation was modified by incorporating liquid property effects. As for the drag coefficient, no correlation exists, which can predict the present data well. Therefore, we developed a new correlation, including three dimensionless numbers, i.e., bubble capillary number, Morton number, and Eötvös number. The correlation predicted the data of Liu et al. (2008, “Drag Coefficient in One-Dimensional Two-Group Two-Fluid Model,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29, pp. 1402–1410) as well as the present data well.


2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (24) ◽  
pp. 7979-7990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
Tae Ho Lee ◽  
Jae Young Lee ◽  
Mamoru Ishii

1990 ◽  
Vol 120 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 163-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isao Kataoka ◽  
Akimi Serizawa

Author(s):  
Hang Liu ◽  
Jianyong Lai ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Yulong Zhang ◽  
Minghao Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract In relation to the modeling of the one-dimensional interfacial area transport equation for an adiabatic bubbly flow in a vertical rod bundle, some existing models of sink and source terms were reviewed and evaluated. Based on the reviewed interaction mechanisms of bubbles and turbulent eddies, a new interfacial area transport model has been proposed. Two important impacts on bubble interaction have been taken into account in the new model: the effects of spacer grids with mixing vanes and the impacts of geometry structure. The spacer grids breakup large bubbles into small bubbles resulting in enhanced bubble random collision at the downstream of the spacer grids. Void transport is the main contribution between spacer grids. The new interfacial area transport model has been evaluated against the obtained experimental data in 17 bubbly flow conditions. The results indicate that the new model can predict the interfacial area concentration with the relative error of 19.9%. It is recognized that the proposed model is promising for predicting the interfacial area concentration for a bubbly flow in a rod bundle.


Author(s):  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Jung Han Park ◽  
Gunol Kojasoy ◽  
Joseph M. Kelly

Present study investigates the geometric effects of flow obstruction on the distribution of local two-phase flow parameters and their transport characteristics in horizontal two-phase flow. The round glass tubes of 50.3mm in inner diameter are employed as test sections, along which a 90-degee elbow is located at L/D = 206.6 from the two-phase mixture inlet. In total, 15 different flow conditions are examined within the air-water bubbly flow regime. The detailed local two-phase flow parameters are acquired by the double-sensor conductivity probe at four different axial locations. The effect of elbow is found to be evident in both the distribution of local parameters and their development. The elbow clearly promotes bubble interactions resulting in significant changes in interfacial area concentration. It is also found that the elbow-effect propagates to be more significant further downstream (L/D = 250) than immediate downstream (L/D = 225) of the elbow. Furthermore, it is shown that the elbow induces significant oscillations in the flow in both vertical and horizontal directions of the tube cross-section. Characteristic geometric effects due to the existence of elbow are also shown clearly on the axial development of one-dimensional interfacial area concentration and void fraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document