Local Interfacial Structure in Downward Two-Phase Bubbly Flow

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Goda ◽  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Sidharth S. Paranjape ◽  
Joshua P. Finch ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Bubbly Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Interfacial Structure ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Interfacial Area Concentration ◽  
Flow Parameters ◽  
Local Parameters ◽  
Axial Development

The local interfacial structure for vertical air-water co-current downward two-phase flow was investigated under adiabatic conditions. A multi-sensor conductivity probe was utilized in order to acquire the local two-phase flow parameters. The present experimental loop consisted of 25.4 mm and 50.8 mm ID round tubes as test sections. The measurement was performed at three axial locations: L/D = 13, 68 and 133 for the 25.4 mm ID loop and L/D = 7, 34, 67 for the 50.8 mm ID loop, in order to study the axial development of the flow. A total of 7 and 10 local measurement points along the tube radius were chosen for the 25.4 mm ID loop and the 50.8 mm ID loop, respectively. The experimental flow conditions were determined within bubbly flow regime. The acquired local parameters included the void fraction, interfacial area concentration, bubble interface frequency, bubble Sauter mean diameter, and interfacial velocity.

Local Interfacial Structures in Horizontal Bubbly Flow with 90-Degree Bend

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Jung Han Park ◽  
Gunol Kojasoy ◽  
Joseph M. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Bubbly Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Interfacial Area Concentration ◽  
Tube Cross Section ◽  
Bubble Interactions ◽  
Flow Parameters ◽  
Geometric Effects

Present study investigates the geometric effects of flow obstruction on the distribution of local two-phase flow parameters and their transport characteristics in horizontal two-phase flow. The round glass tubes of 50.3mm in inner diameter are employed as test sections, along which a 90-degee elbow is located at L/D = 206.6 from the two-phase mixture inlet. In total, 15 different flow conditions are examined within the air-water bubbly flow regime. The detailed local two-phase flow parameters are acquired by the double-sensor conductivity probe at four different axial locations. The effect of elbow is found to be evident in both the distribution of local parameters and their development. The elbow clearly promotes bubble interactions resulting in significant changes in interfacial area concentration. It is also found that the elbow-effect propagates to be more significant further downstream (L/D = 250) than immediate downstream (L/D = 225) of the elbow. Furthermore, it is shown that the elbow induces significant oscillations in the flow in both vertical and horizontal directions of the tube cross-section. Characteristic geometric effects due to the existence of elbow are also shown clearly on the axial development of one-dimensional interfacial area concentration and void fraction.

Axial Development of Local Flow Parameters in Bubbly Two-Phase Flow in Normal and Microgravity Conditions

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Takata ◽  
Dong Chang Xing ◽  
Yutaka Fukuhara ◽  
Tatsuya Hazuku ◽  
Tomoji Takamasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Axial Distance ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Local Flow ◽  
Flow Parameters ◽  
Microgravity Conditions ◽  
Axial Development

In relation to the development of the interfacial area transport equation, a precise database of the axial development of void fraction profile, interfacial area concentration and Sauter mean bubble diameter in an adiabatic nitrogen-water bubbly flow in a 9 mm-diameter pipe was constructed for normal and microgravity conditions using stereo image-processing. The flow measurements were performed at four axial locations (axial distance from the inlet normalized by the pipe diameter, z/D = 5, 20, 40 and 60) and with various flows: superficial gas velocity of 0.00840–0.0298 m/s, and superficial liquid velocity of 0.138–0.914 m/s. The effect of gravity on radial distribution of bubbles and the axial development of two-phase flow parameters is discussed in detail based on the obtained database and visual observation.

scholarly journals Development of Interfacial Structure in a Confined Air-Water Cap-Turbulent and Churn-Turbulent Flow

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Ling Cheng ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Stephen G. Beus
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Test Section ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Interfacial Structure ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Interfacial Area Concentration ◽  
Bubble Number

The objective of the present work is to study and model the interfacial structure development of air-water two-phase flow in a confined test section. Experiments of a total of 9 flow conditions in cap-turbulent and churn-turbulent flow regimes are carried out in a vertical air-water upward two-phase flow experimental loop with a test section of 200-mm in width and 10-mm in gap. Miniaturized four-sensor conductivity probes are used to measure local two-phase parameters at three different elevations for each flow condition. The bubbles captured by the probes are categorized into two groups in view of the two-group interfacial area transport equation, i.e., spherical/distorted bubbles as Group 1 and cap/churn-turbulent bubbles as Group 2. The acquired parameters are time-averaged local void fraction, interfacial velocity, bubble number frequency, interfacial area concentration, and bubble Sauter mean diameter for both groups of bubbles. Also, the line-averaged and area-averaged data are presented and discussed. The comparisons of these parameters at different elevations demonstrate the development of interfacial structure along the flow direction due to bubble interactions.

Image Based Bubbly Flow Feature Identification Using Deep Learning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Furuhashi ◽  
Takuro Sasaki ◽  
Shuichiro Miwa
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Fluid Model ◽  
Bubbly Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Liquid Interface ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Interfacial Area Concentration

Abstract Gas-liquid two-phase flow has high potential in heat transfer and mixing capabilities, and therefore it is utilized in various technologies such as nuclear reactor and chemical plants. There are several flow regimes since the gas-liquid interface transforms constantly. For the sake of safety and optimization in operating plants, it is crucial to understand the behavior of the gas-liquid interface. We have focused on extracting the bubble features in the bubbly flow by filming the bubbly flow with a high-speed camera and training convolutional neural network (CNN) for feature extraction. The assumption made was bubbles in the bubbly flow being ellipsoids. Since void fraction and interfacial area concentration are one of the geometric parameters in the two-phase flow models, like two-fluid model, it becomes possible to evaluate the flow field of the two-phase flow quickly and quantitively by calculating these parameters from the extracted features. We have compared two-phase flow parameters with the conventional object detection method using bounding boxes, and the new ellipse fitting method to identify the best region proposal shape. As a result, the conventional method showed higher accuracy in extracting bubble features under our flow conditions.

Interfacial Structures and Regime Transition in Co-Current Downward Bubbly Flow

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kim ◽  
S. S. Paranjape ◽  
M. Ishii ◽  
J. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Bubbly Flow ◽  
Superficial Velocity ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Drift Flux Model ◽  
Drift Flux ◽  
Flow Parameters ◽  
Interfacial Structures ◽  
Flux Model

The vertical co-current downward air-water two-phase flow was studied under adiabatic condition in round tube test sections of 25.4-mm and 50.8-mm ID. In flow regime identification, a new approach was employed to minimize the subjective judgment. It was found that the flow regimes in the co-current downward flow strongly depend on the channel size. In addition, various local two-phase flow parameters were acquired by the multi-sensor miniaturized conductivity probe in bubbly flow. Furthermore, the area-averaged data acquired by the impedance void meter were analyzed using the drift flux model. Three different distributions parameters were developed for different ranges of non-dimensional superficial velocity, defined by the ration of total superficial velocity to the drift velocity.

Axial Development of Vertical Upward Bubbly Flow in a Minipipe

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Hazuku ◽  
Naohisa Tamura ◽  
Norihiro Fukamachi ◽  
Tomoji Takamasa ◽  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Constitutive Relations ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Local Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area Concentration ◽  
Drift Flux Model

Accurate prediction of the interfacial area concentration is essential to successful development of the interfacial transfer terms in the two-fluid model. Mechanistic modeling of the interfacial area concentration entirely relies on accurate local flow measurements over extensive flow conditions and channel geometries. From this point of view, accurate measurements of flow parameters such as void fraction, interfacial area concentration, gas velocity, bubble Sauter mean diameter, and bubble number density were performed by the image processing method at five axial locations in vertical upward bubbly flows using a 1.02 mm-diameter pipe. The frictional pressure loss was also measured by a differential pressure cell. In the experiment, the superficial liquid velocity and the void fraction ranged from 1.02 m/s to 4.89 m/s and from 0.980% to 24.6%, respectively. The obtained data give near complete information on the time-averaged local hydrodynamic parameters of two-phase flow. These data can be used for the development of reliable constitutive relations which reflect the true transfer mechanisms in two-phase flow. As the first step to understand the flow characteristics in mini-channels, the applicability of the existing drift-flux model, interfacial area correlation, and frictional pressure correlation was examined by the data obtained in the mini-channel.

Modeling and measurement of interfacial area concentration in two-phase flow

2010 ◽  
Vol 240 (9) ◽  
pp. 2329-2337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidharth Paranjape ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Takashi Hibiki
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Interfacial Area Concentration

scholarly journals Experimental Study on Interfacial Area Transport of Two-Phase Flow under Vibration Conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu Xiao ◽  
Qingzi Zhu ◽  
Shao-Wen Chen ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Yajun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Void Fraction ◽  
Vibration Frequency ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Bubble Diameter ◽  
Interfacial Area ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Vibration Direction ◽  
Local Parameters

An experimental study on air-water two-phase flow under vibration condition has been conducted using double-sensor conductivity probe. The test section is an annular geometry with hydraulic diameter of 19.1 mm. The vibration frequency ranges from 0.47 Hz to 2.47 Hz. Local measurements of void fraction, interfacial area concentration (IAC), and Sauter mean diameter have been performed along one radius in the vibration direction. The result shows that local parameters fluctuate continuously around the base values in the vibration cycle. Additional bubble force due to inertia is used to explain lateral bubble motions. The fluctuation amplitudes of local void fraction and IAC increase significantly with vibration frequency. The radial distribution of local parameters at the maximum vibration displacement is specifically analyzed. In the void fraction and IAC profiles, the peak near the inner wall is weakened or even disappearing and a strong peak skewed to outer wall is gradually observed with the increase of vibration frequency. The nondimensional peak void fraction can reach a maximum of 49% and the mean relative variation of local void fraction can increase to more than 29% as the vibration frequency increases to 2.47 Hz. But the increase of vibration frequency does not bring significant change to bubble diameter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document